{"id":27122,"date":"2017-01-09T13:45:38","date_gmt":"2017-01-09T13:45:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/lawandeconomics\/bibliographies\/7900-evidence.html"},"modified":"2017-01-09T13:45:38","modified_gmt":"2017-01-09T13:45:38","slug":"7900-evidence","status":"publish","type":"law_economics","link":"https:\/\/reference.findlaw.com\/lawandeconomics\/bibliographies\/7900-evidence.html","title":{"rendered":"Encyclopedia of Law &#038; Economics \u2013 7900 Evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<ul class=\"links\">\n<li>Boari, Nicola (1997), &#8216;On the Efficiency of Penal Systems: Several Lessons from the Italian Experience&#8217;, <b>17 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 115-126. <\/li>\n<li>Bundy, Stephen M. and Elhauge, Einer Richard (1991), &#8216;Do Lawyers Improve the Adversary System? A General Theory of Litigation Advice and Its Regulation&#8217;, <b>79 <\/b> <em>California Law Review <\/em>, 313-420. <\/li>\n<li>Cooper, Edward H. (1994), &#8216;Discovery Cost Allocation: Comment&#8217;, <b>23 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 465-480. <\/li>\n<li>Cooter, Robert D. and Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1994), &#8216;An Economic Model of Legal Discovery in the U.S.&#8217;, <b>23 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 435-463. <\/li>\n<li>Davis, Michael L. (1994), &#8216;The Value of Truth and the Optimal Standard of Proof in Legal Disputes&#8217;, <b>10 <\/b> <em>Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization <\/em>, 343-359. <\/li>\n<li>Easterbrook, Frank H. (1989), &#8216;Comment: Discovery as Abuse&#8217;, <b>69 <\/b> <em>Boston University Law Review <\/em>, 635-648. <\/li>\n<li>Elliott, E. Donald (1989), &#8216;Toward Incentive-Based Procedure: Three Approaches for Regulating Scientific Evidence&#8217;, <b>69 <\/b> <em>Boston University Law Review <\/em>, 487-511. <\/li>\n<li>Fairley, William B. (1973), &#8216;Probabilistic Analysis of Identification Evidence&#8217;, <b>2 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 493-513. <\/li>\n<li>Fienberg, Stephen E. (ed.) (1989), <em>The Evolving Role of Statistical Assessments as Evidence in the Courts <\/em>, New York, Springer, 357 p. <\/li>\n<li>Froeb, Luke M. and Kobayashi, Bruce H. (1996), &#8216;Naive, Biased, Yet Bayesian: Can Juries Interpret Selectively Produced Evidence?&#8217;, <b>12 <\/b> <em>Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization <\/em>. <\/li>\n<li>Gibbons, T. and Hutchinson, A.C. (1982), &#8216;The Practice and Theory of Evidence Law &#8211; A Note&#8217;, <b>2 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 119-126. <\/li>\n<li>Grady, Mark F., Allen, Ronald J. and Polsby, Daniel (1990), &#8216;A Positive Theory of the Attorney-Client Privilige and the Work-Product Doctrine&#8217;, <b>19 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 359 ff. <\/li>\n<li>Gross, Samuel R. (1987), &#8216;Loss of Innocence: Eyewitness Identification and Proof of Guilt&#8217;, <b>16 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 395-453. <\/li>\n<li>Hay, Bruce L. (1994), &#8216;Civil Discovery: Its Effects and Optimal Scope&#8217;, <b>23 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 481-515. <\/li>\n<li>Hay, Bruce L. and Spier, Kathryn E. (1997), &#8216;Burdens of Proof in Civil Litigation : An Economic Perspective&#8217;, <b>16 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 413-431. <\/li>\n<li>Hay, Bruce L. and Spier, Kathryn E. (1997), &#8216;Burdens of Production in Civil Litigation : An Economic Perspective&#8217;, <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>. <\/li>\n<li>Holm, Hakan J. (1995), &#8216;Computational Cost of Verifying Enforceable Contracts&#8217;, <b>15 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 127-140. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<div data-readmore=\"true\">\n<ul class=\"links\">\n<li>Huber, Peter W. (1989), &#8216;A Comment on &#8216;Toward Incentive-Based Procedure: Three Approaches for Regulating Scientific Evidence&#8217; by E. Donald Elliott&#8217;, <b>69 <\/b> <em>Boston University Law Review <\/em>, 513-516. <\/li>\n<li>Jost, Peter J. (1995), &#8216;Disclosure of Information and Incentives for Care&#8217;, <b>15 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 65-85. <\/li>\n<li>Kaplow, Louis (1980), &#8216;Note, the Theoretical Foundation of the Hearsay Rules&#8217;, <b>93 <\/b> <em>Harvard Law Review <\/em>, 1786-1815. <\/li>\n<li>Kaplow, Louis (1994), &#8216;The Value of Accuracy in Adjudication: An Economic Analysis&#8217;, <b>23 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 307-401. <\/li>\n<li>Kaplow, Louis and Shavell, Steven (1989), &#8216;Legal Advice about Information to Present in Litigation: Its Effects and Social Desirability&#8217;, <b>102 <\/b> <em>Harvard Law Review <\/em>, 565-615. <\/li>\n<li>Kaplow, Louis and Shavell, Steven (1990), &#8216;Legal Advice about Acts Already Committed&#8217;, <b>10 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 149-159. <\/li>\n<li>Kaplow, Louis and Shavell, Steven (1996), &#8216;Accuracy in the Assessment of Damages&#8217;, <b>39 <\/b> <em>Journal of Law and Economics <\/em>, 191-209. <\/li>\n<li>Levmore, Saul and Stuntz, William J. (1990), &#8216;Remedies and Incentives in Private and Public Law: A Comparative Essay&#8217;, <em>Wisconsin Law Review <\/em>, 483-499. <\/li>\n<li>Lewis, Donald E. (1983), &#8216;Economic Aspects of the Parole Decision&#8217;, <b>22 <\/b> <em>Australian Economic Papers <\/em>, 259-279. <\/li>\n<li>Rubinfeld, Daniel L. and Sappington, David E.M. (1987), &#8216;Effi cient Awards and Standards of Proof in Judicial Procee dings&#8217;, <b>18 <\/b> <em>Rand Journal of Economics <\/em>, 308-315. <\/li>\n<li>Sanchirico, Chris William (1997), &#8216;The Burden of Proof in Civil Litigation : A Simple Model of Mechanism Design&#8217;, <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>. <\/li>\n<li>Sanchirico, Chris William (1997), <em>Enforcement by Hearing: An Integrated Model of Evidence Production <\/em>, mimeo, Columbia University Economics Department. <\/li>\n<li>Sanchirico, Chris William (1997), &#8216;Evidence Production, Adversarial Process and the Private Instigation of Suits&#8217;, <em>mimeo, Columbia University Economics Department <\/em>. <\/li>\n<li>Sanchirico, Chris William (1997), &#8216;The Burden of Proof in Civil Litigation: A Simple Model of Mechanism Design&#8217;, <b>17 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 431-447. <\/li>\n<li>Schwartz, Robert L. (1989), &#8216;There is no Archbishop of Science &#8211; A Comment on Elliott&#8217;s Toward Incentive-Based Procedure: Three Approaches for Regulating Scientific Evidence&#8217;, <b>69 <\/b> <em>Boston University Law Review <\/em>, 517-525. <\/li>\n<li>Setear, John K. (1989), &#8216;The Barrister and the Bomb: The Dynamics of Cooperation, Nuclear Deterrence, and Discovery Abuse&#8217;, <b>69 <\/b> <em>Boston University Law Review <\/em>, 569-633. <\/li>\n<li>Shavell, Steven (1988), &#8216;Legal Advice About Contemplated Acts: The Decision to Obtain Advice, Its Social Desirability, and the Protection of Confidentiality&#8217;, <b>17 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 123-150. <\/li>\n<li>Shavell, Steven (1989), &#8216;Optimal Sanctions and the Incentive to Provide Evidence to Legal Tribunals&#8217;, <b>9 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 3-11. <\/li>\n<li>Shaviro, Daniel N. (1989), &#8216;Statistical Probability Evidence and the Appearance of Justice&#8217;, <b>103 <\/b> <em>Harvard Law Review <\/em>, 530-554. <\/li>\n<li>Shaviro, Daniel N. and Koehler, Jonathan J. (1990), &#8216;Veridical Verdicts: Increasing Verdict Accuracy Through the Use of Overtly Probabilistic Evidence and Methods&#8217;, <b>75 <\/b> <em>Cornell Law Review <\/em>, 247-279. <\/li>\n<li>Sobel, Joel (1989), &#8216;An Analysis of Discovery Rules&#8217;, <b>52(1) <\/b> <em>Law and Contemporary Problems <\/em>, 133-160. <\/li>\n<li>Spier, Kathryn E. and Hay, Bruce L. (1996), &#8216;Burdens of Production in Civil Litigation: An Economic Perspective&#8217;, <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>. <\/li>\n<li>Spiotto, James E. (1973), &#8216;Search and Seizure: An Empirical Study of the Exclusionary Rule and Its Alternatives&#8217;, <b>2 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 243-278. <\/li>\n<li>Tullock, Gordon (1988), &#8216;Defending the Napoleontic Code over the Common Law&#8217;, <b>2 <\/b> <em>Research in Law and Policy Studies <\/em>, 3-27. <\/li>\n<li>Weinstein, Jack B. (1989), &#8216;What Discovery Abuse? A Comment on John Setear&#8217;s the Barrister and the Bomb&#8217;, <b>69 <\/b> <em>Boston University Law Review <\/em>, 649-657. <\/li>\n<li>X (1980), &#8216;Note: The Theoretical Foundation of the Hearsay Rules&#8217;, <b>93 <\/b> <em>Harvard Law Review <\/em>, 1786-1815. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"parent":26944,"menu_order":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":false,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"class_list":["post-27122","law_economics","type-law_economics","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reference.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/law_economics\/27122","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reference.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/law_economics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reference.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/law_economics"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reference.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/law_economics\/26944"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reference.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27122"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}