{"id":27105,"date":"2017-01-09T13:45:37","date_gmt":"2017-01-09T13:45:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/lawandeconomics\/bibliographies\/6200-takings.html"},"modified":"2017-01-09T13:45:37","modified_gmt":"2017-01-09T13:45:37","slug":"6200-takings","status":"publish","type":"law_economics","link":"https:\/\/reference.findlaw.com\/lawandeconomics\/bibliographies\/6200-takings.html","title":{"rendered":"Encyclopedia of Law &#038; Economics \u2013 6200 Takings"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<ul class=\"links\">\n<li>Adelstein, Richard P. (1974), &#8216;Just Compensation and the Assassin&#8217;s Bequest: A Utilitarian Approach&#8217;, <b>122 <\/b> <em>University of Pennsylvania Law Review <\/em>, 1012-1032. <\/li>\n<li>Baxter, W. and Altree, L. (1972), &#8216;Legal Aspects of Airport Noise&#8217;, <b>15 <\/b> <em>Journal of Law and Economics <\/em>, 1-113. <\/li>\n<li>Been, Vicki (1991), &#8216;&#8221;Exit&#8221; as a Constraint of Land Use Exactions: Rethinking the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine&#8217;, <b>91 <\/b> <em>Columbia Law Review <\/em>, 473-545. <\/li>\n<li>Benson, Bruce L. (1992), &#8216;The Development of Criminal Law and Its Enforcement: Public Interest or Political Transfers&#8217;, <b>3 <\/b> <em>Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines <\/em>, 79-108. <\/li>\n<li>Benson, Bruce L. (1994), &#8216;Emerging From the Hobbesian Jungle: Might Takes and Makes Rights&#8217;, <b>5 <\/b> <em>Constitutional Political Economy <\/em>, 129-158. Reprinted inTranslated into Spanish and republished (1995) Las Instituciones y Los Derechos de Propiedad al Emerger de la Jungla Hobbesiana: La Fuerza Quita los Reprinted Derechos y los Crea Libertas, 12, 35-75. <\/li>\n<li>Berger, L. (1991), &#8216;Inclusionary Zoning as Takings: The Legacy of the Mount Laurel Cases&#8217;, <b>70 <\/b> <em>Nebraska Law Review <\/em>, 186-228. <\/li>\n<li>Blume, L. and Rubinfeld, D. (1984), &#8216;Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis&#8217;, <b>72 <\/b> <em>California Law Review <\/em>, 569-624. <\/li>\n<li>Blume, L. and Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1987), &#8216;Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis&#8217;, <b>10 <\/b> <em>Research in Law and Economics <\/em>, 53-104. <\/li>\n<li>Blume, L., Rubinfeld, Daniel L. and P. Shapiro (1984), &#8216;The Taking of Land: When Should Compensation Be Paid?&#8217;, <b>99 <\/b> <em>Quarterly Journal of Economics <\/em>, 71-92. <\/li>\n<li>Blume, Lawrence E. and Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1984), &#8216;Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis&#8217;, <b>72 <\/b> <em>California Law Review <\/em>, 569-628. Reprinted in 10 Research in Law and Economics, 1987, 53-103. <\/li>\n<li>Bouckaert, Boudewijn and De Geest, Gerrit (1995), &#8216;Private Takings, Private Taxes, Private Compulsory Services: The Economic Doctrine of Quasi Contracts&#8217;, <b>15 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 463-487. <\/li>\n<li>Bromley, D. (1993), &#8216;Regulatory Takings: Coherent Concept or Logical Contradiction?&#8217;, <b>17 (3) <\/b> <em>Vermont Law Review <\/em>, 647-682. <\/li>\n<li>Bromley, Daniel W. (1993), &#8216;Regulatory Takings: Coherent Concept or Logical Contradiction&#8217;, <b>17 <\/b> <em>Vermont Law Review <\/em>, 647-682. <\/li>\n<li>Buchanan, James M. (1972), &#8216;Politics, Property, and the Law: An Alternative Interpretation of Miller et al. v. Schoene&#8217;, <b>15 <\/b> <em>Journal of Law and Economics <\/em>, 439-452. <\/li>\n<li>Burrows, Paul (1989), &#8216;Getting a Stranglehold with the Eminant Domain Clause&#8217;, <b>9 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 129-147. <\/li>\n<li>Burrows, Paul (1991), &#8216;Compensation for Compulsory Acquisition&#8217;, <b>67 <\/b> <em>Land Economics <\/em>, 49-63. <\/li>\n<li>Cohen, Lloyd R. (1991), &#8216;Holdouts and Free Riders&#8217;, <b>20 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 351-362. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<div data-readmore=\"true\">\n<ul class=\"links\">\n<li>Connors, C. (1990), &#8216;Back to the Future: The &#8220;Nuisance Exception&#8221; to the Just Compensation Clause&#8217;, <b>19 <\/b> <em>Capital University Law Review <\/em>, 139-185. <\/li>\n<li>Disheroon, F. (1993), &#8216;After Lucas: No More Wetland Takings?&#8217;, <b>13(3) <\/b> <em>Vermont Law Review <\/em>, 683-693. <\/li>\n<li>Dudley, B. and MacDonald, J. (1995), &#8216;Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, Takings, and the Search for the Common Good&#8217;, <b>33 <\/b> <em>American Business Law Journal <\/em>, 153-178. <\/li>\n<li>Durham, James Geoffrey (1985), &#8216;Efficient Just Compensation as a Limit on Eminent Domain&#8217;, <b>69 <\/b> <em>Minnesota Law Review <\/em>, 1277-1313. <\/li>\n<li>Echeverria, J. and S. Dennis. (1993), &#8216;The Takings Issue and the Due Process Clause: A Way Out of a Doctrinal Confusion&#8217;, <b>17(3) <\/b> <em>Vermont Law Review <\/em>, 695-721. <\/li>\n<li>Epstein, R. (1992), &#8216;Ruminations on Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council: An Introduction on Amicus Curiae Brief&#8217;, <b>25 <\/b> <em>Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review <\/em>, 1225-1232. <\/li>\n<li>Epstein, R., Mellor, W. III, Bolick, C., Emord, J. and Bullock, S. (1992), &#8216;David Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council: Brief for the Institute for Justice as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner&#8217;, <b>25 <\/b> <em>Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review <\/em>, 1233-1258. <\/li>\n<li>Epstein, Richard A. (1985), <em>Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain <\/em>, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 362 p. <\/li>\n<li>Epstein, Richard A. (1987), &#8216;Takings: Descent and Resurrection&#8217;, <em>Supreme Court Review <\/em>, 1-45. <\/li>\n<li>Epstein, Richard A. (1992), &#8216;Ruminations on Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council: An Introduction to Amicus Curiae Brief&#8217;, <b>25 <\/b> <em>Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review <\/em>, 1225-1232. <\/li>\n<li>Epstein, Richard A., W., Mellor III. C., Bolick, J. Emord and S. Bullock. (1992), &#8216;David Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council: Brief for the Institute for Justice as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner&#8217;, <b>25 <\/b> <em>Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review <\/em>, 1233-1258. <\/li>\n<li>Farber, Daniel A. (1992), &#8216;Economic Analysis and Just Compensation&#8217;, <b>12 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 125-138. <\/li>\n<li>Fischel, Wiliam A. (1992), &#8216;Exploring the Kozinsky Paradox: Why is More Efficient Regulation a Taking of Property?&#8217;, <b>67 <\/b> <em>Chicago-Kent Law Review <\/em>, 865-912. <\/li>\n<li>Fischel, William A. (1987), &#8216;The Economics of Land Use Exactions: A Property Rights Analysis&#8217;, <b>50 <\/b> <em>Law and Contemporary Problems <\/em>, 101-113. Reprinted in Stein, Jay M. (Ed.), Classic Readings in Real Estate and Development, Washington, DC, ULI&#8211;the Urban Land Institute, 1996. <\/li>\n<li>Fischel, William A. (1988), &#8216;Introduction: Utilitarian Balancing and Formalism in Takings&#8217;, <b>88 <\/b> <em>Columbia Law Review <\/em>, 1581-1599. <\/li>\n<li>Fischel, William A. (1991), &#8216;Exploring the Kozinski Paradox: Why Is More Efficient Regulation a Taking of Property?&#8217;, <b>67(3) <\/b> <em>Chicago-Kent Law Review <\/em>, 865-912. <\/li>\n<li>Fischel, William A. (1995), <em>Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics, and Politics <\/em>, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press. <\/li>\n<li>Fischel, William A. (1995), &#8216;The Offer\/Ask Disparity and Just Compensation for Takings: A Constitutional Choice Perspective&#8217;, <b>15 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 187-203. <\/li>\n<li>Fischel, William A. (1996), &#8216;The Political Economy of Just Compensation: Lessons from the Military Draft for the Takings Issue&#8217;, <em>Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy <\/em>. <\/li>\n<li>Fischel, William A. and Shapiro, Perry (1989), &#8216;A Constitutional Choice Model of Compensation for Takings&#8217;, <b>9 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 115-128. <\/li>\n<li>Fishel, William A. and Shapiro, Perry (1988), &#8216;Takings, Insurance and Michelman: Comments on Economic Interpretations of &#8220;Just Compensation&#8221; Law&#8217;, <b>17 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 269-293. Reprinted in Robert Ellickson, Carol Rose, and Bruce Ackerman (Eds.), Perspectives on Property Law, 2d ed., 514-530, Boston, Little Brown, 1995. <\/li>\n<li>Fisher, W. III. (1988), &#8216;The Significance of Public Perceptions of the Takings Doctrine&#8217;, <b>88 <\/b> <em>Columbia Law Review <\/em>, 1774-1794. <\/li>\n<li>Fisher, W. III. (1993), &#8216;The Trouble with Lucas&#8217;, <b>45 <\/b> <em>Stanford Law Review <\/em>, 1393-1410. <\/li>\n<li>Francis, L (1984), &#8216;Eminent Domain Compensation in Western States&#8217;, <em>Utah Law Review <\/em>, 429-484. <\/li>\n<li>Frech, H. Edward III (1982), &#8216;The California Coastal Commissions: Economic Impacts&#8217;, in Johnson, Bruce M. (ed.), <em>Resolving the Housing Crisis: Government Policy, Decontrol and the Public Interest <\/em>, Ballinger, 259-274. <\/li>\n<li>Frech, H.Edward III and Lafferty, Ronald N. (1976), &#8216;The Economic Impact of the California Coastal Commission: Land Use and Land Values&#8217;, in Johnson, Bruce M. (ed.), <em>The California Coastal Plan: A Critique <\/em>, Institute for Contemporary Studies, 69-91. <\/li>\n<li>Frech, H.Edward III and Lafferty, Ronald N. (1978), &#8216;Community Environment and the Market Value of Single-Family Homes: The Effect of Dispersion of Land Uses&#8217;, <b>21 <\/b> <em>Journal of Law and Economics <\/em>, 381-396. <\/li>\n<li>Freyer, T. (1981), &#8216;Reassessing the Impact of Eminent Domain in Early American Economic Development&#8217;, <em>Wisconsin Law Review <\/em>, 1263-1286. <\/li>\n<li>Friedman, L. (1986), &#8216;A Search for Seizure: Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon in Context&#8217;, <b>4 <\/b> <em>Law and History Review <\/em>, 1-22. <\/li>\n<li>Gecker, Frances F. (1987), &#8216;Comment: The Recovery of Opportunity Costs as Just Compensation: A Takings Analysis of Adequate Protection&#8217;, <b>81 <\/b> <em>Northwestern University Law Review <\/em>, 953-1025. <\/li>\n<li>Ghosh, Shubha (1997), &#8216;Takings, the Exit Option and Just Compensation&#8217;, <b>17 <\/b> <em>International Review of Law and Economics <\/em>, 157-176. <\/li>\n<li>Goldberg, Victor P., Merrill T. and D. Unumb. (1987), &#8216;Bargaining in the Shadow of Eminent Domain: Valuing and Apportioning Condemnation Awards Between Landlord and Tenant&#8217;, <b>34 <\/b> <em>UCLA Law Review <\/em>, 1083-1137. <\/li>\n<li>Goldberg, Victor P., Merrill, Thomas W. and Unumb, Daniel (1987), &#8216;Bargaining in the Shadow of Eminent Domain: Valuing and Apportioning Condemnation Awards Between Landlord and Tenant&#8217;, <b>34 <\/b> <em>UCLA Law Review <\/em>, 1083-1137. <\/li>\n<li>Grofman, Bernard and Wittman, Donald A. (eds.) (1989), <em>The Federalist Papers: The New Institutionalism and the Old <\/em>, Agathon Press. <\/li>\n<li>Hermalin, Benjamin E. (1995), &#8216;An Economic Analysis of Takings&#8217;, <b>11 <\/b> <em>Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization <\/em>, 64-86. <\/li>\n<li>Hippler, T. (1987), &#8216;Reexamining 100 Years of Supreme Court Regulatory Taking Doctrine: The Principles of &#8220;Noxious Use&#8221;, &#8220;Average reciprocity of Advantage&#8221;, &#8220;and &#8220;Bundle of Rights&#8221; for Mugler to Keystone Bituminous Coal&#8217;, <b>14 <\/b> <em>Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review <\/em>, 653-727. <\/li>\n<li>Innes, R. (1994), <em>Takings, Compensation and Equal Protection for Owners of Developed and Undeveloped Land. Mimeo <\/em>, University of Arizona. <\/li>\n<li>Innes, R. (1995), &#8216;An Essay on Takings: Concepts and Issues&#8217;, <b>4 <\/b> <em>Choices <\/em>. <\/li>\n<li>Johnson, M. Bruce (1977), &#8216;Planning without Prices: A Discussion of Land Use Regulation Without Compensation&#8217;, in Siegan, Bernard H. (ed.), <em>Planning Without Prices <\/em>, Lexington (MA), Lexington Books, 63-111. <\/li>\n<li>Kaplow, Louis (1986), &#8216;An Economic Analysis of Legal Transitions&#8217;, <b>99 <\/b> <em>Harvard Law Review <\/em>, 509-617. <\/li>\n<li>Kaplow, Louis (1987), <em>Optimal Transition Policy: Replacing Horizontal Equity with an Ex Ante Incentives Perspective <\/em>, Dissertation accepted by Harvard University Department of Economics. <\/li>\n<li>Kaplow, Louis (1992), &#8216;Government Relief for Risk Associated with Government Action&#8217;, <b>94 <\/b> <em>Scandinavian Journal of Economics <\/em>, 525-541. <\/li>\n<li>Kmiec, D. (1981), &#8216;Regulatory Takings: The Court Runs Out of Gas in San Diego&#8217;, <b>57 <\/b> <em>Indiana Law Journal <\/em>, 45-81. <\/li>\n<li>Kmiec, D. (1988), &#8216;The Original Understanding of the Taking Clause is Neither Weak Nor Obtuse&#8217;, <b>88 <\/b> <em>Columbia Law Review <\/em>, 1630-1666. <\/li>\n<li>Knetsch, J. (1983), <em>Property Rights and Compensation: Compulsory Acquisitions and Other Losses <\/em>, Toronto, Butterworths. <\/li>\n<li>Knetsch, J. and T. Borcherding (1979), &#8216;Expropriation of Private Property and the Basis for Compensation&#8217;, <b>29 <\/b> <em>University of Toronto Law Journal <\/em>, 237-252. <\/li>\n<li>Knetsch, Jack L. (1990), &#8216;Environmental Policy Implications of Disparities between Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded Measures of Values&#8217;, <b>18 <\/b> <em>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management <\/em>, 227-237. <\/li>\n<li>La Croix, Summer and Rose, L. (1995), &#8216;Public Use, Just Compensation, and Land Reform in Hawaii&#8217;, <em>Research in Law and Economics <\/em>, 17 ff. <\/li>\n<li>Levmore, Saul (1990), &#8216;Just Compensation and Just Politics&#8217;, <b>22 <\/b> <em>Connecticut Law Review <\/em>, 285-322. <\/li>\n<li>Levmore, Saul (1991), &#8216;Takings, Torts, and Special Interests&#8217;, <b>77 <\/b> <em>Virginia Law Review <\/em>, 1333-1368. <\/li>\n<li>Levmore, Saul and Stuntz, William J. (1990), &#8216;Remedies and Incentives in Private and Public Law: A Comparative Essay&#8217;, <em>Wisconsin Law Review <\/em>, 483-499. <\/li>\n<li>Lodise, John P. (1988), &#8216;Retroactive Compensation and the Illusion of Economic Efficiency: An Analysis of the First English Decision&#8217;, <b>35 <\/b> <em>UCLA Law Review <\/em>, 1267-1290. <\/li>\n<li>Lunney, G. (1992), &#8216;A Critical Reexamination of the Takings Jurisprudence&#8217;, <b>90 <\/b> <em>Michigan Law Review <\/em>, 1892-1965. <\/li>\n<li>MacKaay, Ejan (1987), &#8216;Le paradoxe des droits acquis (The Paradox of Acquired Rights)&#8217;, in X (ed.), <em>De &#8220;l&#8217;ancienne&#8221; \u0088 la &#8220;nouvelle&#8221; \u008economie. Essais \u0088 l&#8217;occasion de la dixi\u008fme universit\u008e d&#8217;\u008et\u008e de la nouvelle \u008economie <\/em>, Aix-en-Provence, Librairie de l&#8217;Universit\u008e, 205-219. <\/li>\n<li>MacKaay, Ejan (1991), &#8216;La propri\u008et\u008e est-elle en voie d&#8217;extinction? (Is Property about to Become Extinct?)&#8217;, in Mackaay, Ejan (ed.), <em>Nouvelles technologies et propri\u008et\u008e <\/em>, Montr\u008eal, \u0083d. Th\u008emis, Paris, LITEC, 217-247. <\/li>\n<li>Mandelker, D. (1987), &#8216;Investment-Backed Expectations: Is There a Taking?&#8217;, <b>31 <\/b> <em>Journal of Urban and Contemporary Problems <\/em>, 3-43. <\/li>\n<li>Manheim, K. (1989), &#8216;Tenant Eviction and the Takings Clause&#8217;, <em>Wisconsin Law Review <\/em>, 925-1019. <\/li>\n<li>McKenzie, Richard B. (1986), &#8216;Eminent Domain: A New Industrial Policy Tool&#8217;, <b>142 <\/b> <em>Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics <\/em>, 27-38. <\/li>\n<li>Medema, S. (1992), &#8216;Making Choices and Making Law: An Institutional Perspective on the Taking Issue&#8217;, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), <em>Taking Property and Just Compensation: Law and Economics Perspectives of the Takings Issue <\/em>, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers. <\/li>\n<li>Medema, Steven G. (1992), &#8216;Probing the Legal-Economic Nexus: Takings, 1978-1988&#8217;, <b>26 <\/b> <em>Journal of Economic Issues <\/em>, 525-534. <\/li>\n<li>Medema, Steven G. (1992), &#8216;Making Choices and Making Law: An Institutional Perspective on the Taking Issue&#8217;, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), <em>Legal Economic Perspectives on the Taking Issue <\/em>, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 45-77. <\/li>\n<li>Mercuro, Nicholas (1992), &#8216;The Takings Issue: A Continuing Dilemma in Law and Economics&#8217;, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), <em>Taking Property and Just Compensation: Law and Economics Perspectives of the Takings Issue <\/em>, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1-23. <\/li>\n<li>Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.) (1992), <em>Taking Property and Just Compensation: Legal and Economics Perspectives of the Takings Issue <\/em>, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers. <\/li>\n<li>Mercuro, Nicholas and Ryan, Thimothy P. (1980), &#8216;Property Rights and Welfare Economics: Miller et al. v. Schoene Revisited: Reply&#8217;, <b>56(2) <\/b> <em>Land Economics <\/em>, 202-212. <\/li>\n<li>Mercuro, Nicholas and Ryan, Thimothy P. (1981), &#8216;Property Rights and Welfare Economics: Miller et al. v. Schoene Revisited: Reply&#8217;, <b>57(4) <\/b> <em>Land Economics <\/em>, 657-659. <\/li>\n<li>Merrill, T. (1986), &#8216;The Economics of Public Use&#8217;, <b>72 <\/b> <em>Cornell Law Review <\/em>, 61-116. <\/li>\n<li>Merrill, T. (1986), &#8216;Rent Seeking and the Compensation Principle&#8217;, <b>80 <\/b> <em>Northwestern Law Review <\/em>, 1561-1589. <\/li>\n<li>Miceli, Thomas J. (1991), &#8216;Compensation for the Taking of Land Under Eminent Domain&#8217;, <b>147 <\/b> <em>Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics <\/em>, 354-363. <\/li>\n<li>Miceli, Thomas J. and Segerson, Kathleen (1994), &#8216;Regulatory Takings: When Should Compensation Be Paid?&#8217;, <b>23 <\/b> <em>Journal of Legal Studies <\/em>, 749-776. <\/li>\n<li>Miceli, Thomas J. and Segerson, Kathleen (1995), &#8216;Government Regulation and Compensation for Takings: Implications for Agriculture&#8217;, <b>77 <\/b> <em>American Journal of Agricultural Economics <\/em>, 1177-1182. <\/li>\n<li>Miceli, Thomas J. and Segerson, Kathleen (1996), <em>Compensation for Regulatory Takings: An Economic Analysis with Applications <\/em>, Greenwood, JAI Press. <\/li>\n<li>Miceli, Thomas J. and Segerson, Kathleen (1996), <em>Compensation for Regulatory Takings: An Economic Analysis with Applications <\/em>, Greenwood, JAI Press. <\/li>\n<li>Michelman, Frank I. (1967), &#8216;Property, Utility and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of &#8220;Just Compensation&#8221; Law&#8217;, <b>80 <\/b> <em>Harvard Law Review <\/em>, 1165-1258. Reprinted in Ackerman, Bruce A. (ed.), Economic Foundations of Property a Law, Boston, Little Brown, 1975, 100 ff. <\/li>\n<li>Michelman, Frank I. (1988), &#8216;Takings&#8217;, <b>88 <\/b> <em>Columbia Law Review <\/em>, 1600-1629. <\/li>\n<li>Munch, Patricia (1976), &#8216;An Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain&#8217;, <b>84 <\/b> <em>Journal of Political Economy <\/em>, 473-497. <\/li>\n<li>Paul, E. (1987), <em>Property Rights and Eminent Domain <\/em>, New Brunswick (NJ), Transaction. <\/li>\n<li>Paul, Ellen Frankel (1987), &#8216;Public Use: A Vanishing Limitation on Governmental Takings&#8217;, in Dorn, James A. and Manne, Henry G. (eds.), <em>Economic Liberties and the Judiciary <\/em>, Fairfax, George Mason University Press, 357-373. <\/li>\n<li>Peterson, Andrew A. (1989), &#8216;The Takings Clause: In Search of Underlying Principles&#8217;, <b>77 <\/b> <em>California Law Review <\/em>, 1299-1363. <\/li>\n<li>Poirier, M. (1993), &#8216;Takings and Natural Hazards Policy: Public Choice on the Beachfront&#8217;, <b>46 <\/b> <em>Rutgers Law Review <\/em>, 243-347. <\/li>\n<li>Rose, Carol M. (1984), &#8216;Mahon Reconstructed: Why the Takings Issue is Still a Muddle&#8217;, <b>57 <\/b> <em>Southern California Law Review <\/em>, 561-599. <\/li>\n<li>Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1988), &#8216;Against Ad Hocery: A Comment on Michelman&#8217;, <b>88 <\/b> <em>Columbia Law Review <\/em>, 1697-1711. <\/li>\n<li>Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1992), &#8216;Regulatory Takings: Policy Analysis and Democratic Principles&#8217;, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), <em>Taking Property and Just Compensation: Law and Economics Perspectives of the Takings Issue <\/em>, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 25-44. <\/li>\n<li>Ross, Thomas W. (1994), &#8216;Raising an Army: A Positive Theory of Military Recruitment&#8217;, <b>37 <\/b> <em>Journal of Law and Economics <\/em>, 109-131. <\/li>\n<li>Rowley, Charles K. (1992), &#8216;The Supreme Court and Takings Judgments: Constitutional Political Economy versus Public Choice&#8217;, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), <em>Taking Property and Just Compensation: Law and Economics Perspectives of the Takings Issue <\/em>, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 79-124. <\/li>\n<li>Rubenfeld, J. (1993), &#8216;Usings&#8217;, <b>102 <\/b> <em>Yale Law Journal <\/em>, 1077-1163. <\/li>\n<li>Runge, C. (1993), &#8216;Economic Implications of Wider Compensation for &#8220;Takings&#8221; or, What if Agricultural Policies Ruled the World?&#8217;, <b>17 <\/b> <em>Vermont Law Review <\/em>, 723-739. <\/li>\n<li>Samuels, Warren G. and Mercuro, Nicholas (1979), &#8216;The Role and Resolution of the Compensation Principle in Society, Part I &#8211; the Role&#8217;, <b>1 <\/b> <em>Research in Law and Economics <\/em>, 157-194. <\/li>\n<li>Samuels, Warren J. (1974), &#8216;Commentary: An Economic Perspective on the Compensation Problem&#8217;, <b>21 <\/b> <em>Wayne Law Review <\/em>, 113-134. Reprinted in Samuels, Warren J. and Schmid, A. Allen (eds.), Law and Economics: An Institutional Perspective, Boston, Nijhoff, 1981, 188-209. <\/li>\n<li>Samuels, Warren J. and Mercuro, Nicholas (1979), &#8216;The Role and Resolution of the Compensation Principle in Society: Part One &#8212; The Role&#8217;, <b>1 <\/b> <em>Research in Law and Economics <\/em>, 157-194. <\/li>\n<li>Samuels, Warren J. and Mercuro, Nicholas (1980), &#8216;The Role and Resolution of the Compensation Principle in Society: Part Two &#8212; The Resolution&#8217;, <b>2 <\/b> <em>Research in Law and Economics <\/em>, 103-128. <\/li>\n<li>Sax, Joseph L. (1964), &#8216;Takings and the Police Power&#8217;, <b>74 <\/b> <em>Yale Law Journal <\/em>, 36-76. <\/li>\n<li>Sax, Joseph L. (1971), &#8216;Takings, Private Property and Public Rights&#8217;, <b>81 <\/b> <em>Yale Law Journal <\/em>, 149-186. Reprinted in Ackerman, Bruce A. (ed.), Economic Foundations of Property a Law, Boston, Little Brown, 1975, 146-158. <\/li>\n<li>Schill, M. (1989), &#8216;Intergovernmental Takings and Just Compensation: A Question of Federalism&#8217;, <b>137 <\/b> <em>University of Pennsylvania Law Review <\/em>, 829-901. <\/li>\n<li>Siegan, Bernard H. (1972), <em>Land Use Without Zoning <\/em>, Lexington (MA), Lexington Books. <\/li>\n<li>Stake, Jeffrey E. (1995), &#8216;Loss Aversion and Involuntary Transfers of Title&#8217;, in Malloy, Robin P. and Braun, Christopher K. (eds.), <em>Law and Economics: New and Critical Perspectives <\/em>, New York, Peter Lang, 331-360. <\/li>\n<li>Stein, G (1995), &#8216;Regulatory Takings and Ripeness in Federal Courts&#8217;, <b>48 <\/b> <em>Vanderbilt Law Review <\/em>, 1-99. <\/li>\n<li>Stoebuck, W. (1969), &#8216;The Property Right of Access versus the Power of Eminent Domain&#8217;, <b>47 <\/b> <em>Texas Law Review <\/em>, 733-765. <\/li>\n<li>Stoebuck, W. (1972), &#8216;A General Theory of Eminent Domain&#8217;, <b>47 <\/b> <em>Washington Law Review <\/em>, 553-608. <\/li>\n<li>Swank, W. (1976), &#8216;Note. Inverse Condemnation: The Case for Diminution in Property Values as Compensable Damage&#8217;, <b>28 <\/b> <em>Stanford Law Review <\/em>, 779-804. <\/li>\n<li>Symposium (1988), &#8216;Symposium on Takings&#8217;, <b>88 <\/b> <em>Columbia Law Review <\/em>, 1581-1794. <\/li>\n<li>Thompson, B. (1990), &#8216;Judicial Takings&#8217;, <b>76 <\/b> <em>Virginia Law Review <\/em>, 1449-1544. <\/li>\n<li>Tideman, T. Nicolaus (1988), &#8216;Takings, Moral Evolution, and Justice&#8217;, <b>88 <\/b> <em>Columbia Law Review <\/em>, 1714-1730. <\/li>\n<li>Tiefer, C. (1996), &#8216;Controlling Federal Agencies by Claims on Their Appropriations? the Takings Bill and the Power of the Purse.&#8217;, <b>13(2) <\/b> <em>Yale Journal on Regulation <\/em>, 501-534. <\/li>\n<li>Treanor, W. (1985), &#8216;The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment&#8217;, <b>94 <\/b> <em>Yale Law Journal <\/em>, 694-716. <\/li>\n<li>Trefzger, J. and P. Colwell (1996), &#8216;Investor Efficiency in the Face of Takings&#8217;, <b>12(1) <\/b> <em>Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics <\/em>, 23-35. <\/li>\n<li>Ulen, Thomas S. (1992), &#8216;The Public Use of Private Property: A Dual Constraint Theory of Efficient Government Takings&#8217;, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), <em>Taking Property and Just Compensation: Law and Economics Perspectives of the Takings Issue <\/em>, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 163-198. <\/li>\n<li>Werin, Lars (1978), &#8216;Expropriation &#8211; en studie i lagstiftningsmotiv och ers\u008attningsr\u008attsliga grundprinciper (Expropriation &#8211; A Study in Legislative Motives and Compensatory Basic Principles)&#8217;, <em>Svensk Juristtidning <\/em>, 81-120. <\/li>\n<li>Wittman, Donald A. (1995), <em>The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why political Institutions are Efficient <\/em>, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. <\/li>\n<li>Yandle, Bruce (1995), <em>Land Rights: The 1990&#8217;s Property Rights Rebellion <\/em>, Lanham (MD), Rowman and Littlefield. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"parent":26944,"menu_order":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":false,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"class_list":["post-27105","law_economics","type-law_economics","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reference.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/law_economics\/27105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reference.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/law_economics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reference.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/law_economics"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reference.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/law_economics\/26944"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reference.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}