Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Encyclopedia of Law & Economics – 7100 Judicial Administration & Organization

  • Adams, Michael (1995), ‘The Conflict of Jurisdictors – An Economic Analysis of Pretrial Discovery, Fact Gathering and Cost Allocation Rules in the United States and Germany’, 3(1) European Review of Private Law , 53-94.
  • Backhaus, JŸrgen G. (1992), ‘General Legislation and the Budget: Commentary’, 12 International Review of Law and Economics , 209-210.
  • Barnard, David (1977), The Civil Court in Action , Butterworths, London, 350 p.
  • Beier, Martin D. (1990), ‘Economics Awry: Using Access Fees for Caseload Diversion’, 138 University of Pennsylvania Law Review , 1175-1207.
  • Bowles, Roger A. (1980), ‘Juries, Incentives and Self- Selection’, 20 British Journal of Criminology , 368-376.
  • Brunet, Edward (1985), ‘Measuring the Costs of Civil Justice’, 83 Michigan Law Review , 916-938.
  • Buscaglia, Edgardo and Ulen, Thomas S. (1997), ‘A Quantitative Assessment of the Efficiency of the Judicial Sector in Latin America’, 17 International Review of Law and Economics , 275-291.
  • Casper, Gerhard and Posner, Richard A. (1974), ‘A Study of the Supreme Court’s Caseload’, 3 Journal of Legal Studies , 339-375.
  • Casper, Gerhard and Posner, Richard A. (1976), The Workload of the Supreme Court , Chicago, American Bar Foundation.
  • Casper, Gerhard and Zeisel, Hans (1972), ‘Lay Judges in the German Criminal Courts’, 1 Journal of Legal Studies , 135-191.
  • Cohen, Mark A. (1989), ‘The Role of Criminal Sanctions in Antitrust Enforcement’, 7(4) Contemporary Policy Issues , 36-46.
  • Cohen, Mark A. (1991), ‘Explaining Judicial Behavior or What’s “Unconstitutional” about the Sentencing Commission?’, 7 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization , 183-199.
  • Cohen, Mark A. (1992), ‘The Motives of Judges: Empirical Evidence from Antitrust Sentencing’, 12 International Review of Law and Economics , 13-30.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1983), ‘The Objectives of Private and Public Judges’, 41 Public Choice , 107-132.
  • Ebner, P. (1982), Reducing Pretrial Delay… A Look at What State an , Santa Monica, Institute for Civil Justice, Rand Corporation.
  • Feeley, Malcolm (1983), Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail , New York, Basic Books, 251 p.
  • Flanagan, Robert J. (1987), Labor Relations and the Litigation Explosion , Washington, Brookings Institution, 122 p.
  • Friedman, David D. (1979), ‘Private Creation and Enforcement of Law: A Historical Case’, 8 Journal of Legal Studies , 399-415.
  • Galanter, Marc (1986), ‘The Day After the Litigation Explosion’, 46 Maryland Law Review , 3 ff.
  • Gely, Rafael and Spiller, Pablo T. (1990), ‘A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the … State Farm … Grove City Cases’, 6 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization , 263-300.
  • Gillespie, Robert W. (1976), ‘The Production of Court Services: An Analysis of Scale Effects and Other Factors’, 5 Journal of Legal Studies , 243-265.
  • Goldman, Jerry, Hooper, Richard L. and Mahaffey, Judy (1976), ‘Caseload Forecasting Models for Federal District Courts’, 5 Journal of Legal Studies , 201-242.
  • Good, I.J. and Tullock, Gordon (1984), ‘Judicial Errors and a Proposal for Reform’, 13 Journal of Legal Studies , 289-298.
  • Gravelle, Hugh S.E. (1983), ‘Judicial Review and Public Firms’, 3 International Review of Law and Economics , 187-205.
  • Greenberg, Paul E. and Haley, James A. (1986), ‘The Role of the Compensation Structure in Enhancing Judicial Quality’, 15 Journal of Legal Studies , 417-426.
  • Griffiths, J. (1991), ‘De rechtbank als fietsenfabriek (The Court as Bicycle Manufacturer)’, 66 Nederlands Juristenblad , 129-130.
  • Hazard, Geoffrey C., Jr. (1965), ‘Rationing Justice’, 8 Journal of Law and Economics , 1-10.
  • Karotkin, Drora (1994), ‘Effect of the Size of the Bench on the Correctness of Court Judgments: The Case of Israel’, 14 International Review of Law and Economics , 371-375.
  • Klevorick, Alvin K. (1977), ‘Jury Composition: An Economic Approach’, in Siegan, Bernard H. (ed.), The Interactions of Economics and the Law , Lexington (MA), Lexington Books.
  • Klevorick, Alvin K. and Rothschild, Michael (1979), ‘A Model of the Jury Decision Process’, 8 Journal of Legal Studies , 141-164.
  • Knack, Stephen (1993), ‘The Voter Participation Effects of Selecting Jurors from Registration Lists’, 36 Journal of Law and Economics , 99-114.
  • Kobayashi, Bruce H. and Jeffrey S. Parker (1993), ‘No Armistice at 11: A Comment on the Amendments to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure’, 3 Supreme Court Economic Review , 93-152.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1989), ‘An Economic Perspective on Stare Decisis’, 65 Chicago-Kent Law Review , 63-92.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1992), ‘Modeling Collegial Courts I: Path Dependence’, 12 International Review of Law and Economics , 169-185.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1992), ‘Modeling Collegial Courts. II. Legal Doctrine’, 8 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization , 441-470.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1995), ‘Adjudication by a Resource-Constrained Team: Hierarchy and Precedent in a Judicial System’, 68 Southern California Law Review , 1605 ff.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. and Sager, Lawrence G. (1986), ‘Unpacking the Court’, 96 Yale Law Journal , 82-117.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. and Slager, L. (1993), ‘The One and the Many: Adjudication in Collegial Courts’, 81 California Law Review , 1 ff.
  • Kraakman, Reinier H. (1979), ‘Note, Article III Constitution and the Expanding Civil Jurisdiction of United States Magistrates: A Dissenting View’, 88 Yale Law Journal , 1023-1061.
  • Landes, William M. (1971), ‘An Economic Analysis of the Courts’, 14 Journal of Law and Economics , 61-107.
  • Landes, William M. (1993), ‘Sequential versus Unitary Trials: An Economic Analysis’, 22 Journal of Legal Studies , 99-134.
  • Levin, Martin A. (1975), ‘Delay in Five Criminal Courts’, 4 Journal of Legal Studies , 83-131.
  • Martin, Donald L. (1972), ‘The Economics of Jury Conscription’, 80 Journal of Political Economy , 680-702.
  • Melumad, Nahum D. and Thoman, Lynda (1990), ‘On Auditors and the Courts in an Adverse Selection Setting’, 28 Journal of Accounting Research , 77-120.
  • Miceli, Thomas J. and Metin M. Cosgel (1994), ‘Reputation and Judicial Decisionmaking’, 23 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 31-51.
  • Miller, Arthur R. (1984), ‘The Adversary System: Dinosaur or Phoenix’, 69 Minnesota Law Review , 1-37.
  • Miller, Geoffrey P. (1989), ‘Comment: Some Thoughts on the Equilibrium Hypothesis’, 69 Boston University Law Review , 561-568.
  • Noam, Eli M. (1981), ‘A Cost-benefit Model of Criminal Courts’, 3 Research in Law and Economics , 173-183.
  • Noll, Roger G. (1992), ‘Judicial Review and the Power of the Purse: Comment’, 12 International Review of Law and Economics , 211-213.
  • Pastor, Santos (1988), Elementos para un an‡lisis econ—mico de la Justicia: el gasto pœblico en justicia en Espa–a (Public Expenditure in the Courts: Reflections on Method and Scope) , Hacienda Pœblica Espa–ola.
  • Pastor, Santos (1989), ‘Econom’a de la Justicia (I) (Economics of Litigation I)’, 5 Revista de Econom’a Pœblica , 131-169.
  • Pastor, Santos (1989), ‘Fundamentos de pol’tica judicial (Foundations of Judicial Policy)’, 1541 Bolet’n de Informaci—n del Ministerio de Justicia .
  • Pastor, Santos (1990), ‘Econom’a de la Justicia (II) (Economics of Litigation II)’, 6 Revista de Econom’a Pœblica , 69-86.
  • Pastor, Santos (1990), ‘Econom’a de la Justicia en Espa–a (Problems in the Spanish Courts)’, 4 Revista de Econom’a , 65-69.
  • Pastor, Santos (1990), ‘El an‡lisis econ—mico del acceso a la Justicia (The Economics of Access to Justice)’, 687 Informaci—n Comercial Espa–ola , 23-42.
  • Pastor, Santos (1990), ‘Econom“a de la Justicia (I) y (II) (Economics of the Judicature)’, Revista de Econom’a Pœblica .
  • Pastor, Santos (1990), ‘Econom“a de la Justicia en Espa–a (The Spanish Courts and the Economic Analysis)’, Revista de Econom’a , 4 ff.
  • Pastor, Santos (1991), ‘Informe sobre la litigaci—n, recursos y acceso de los cuidadanos a la Justicie (Report on Litigation, Courts Inputs and Access to Justice)’, in Ministerio De Justicia (ed.), Materiales para una reforma Procesal , Madrid.
  • Pastor, Santos (1991), ‘Elementos para la reforma procesal: an‡lisis de la litigaci—n, oferta de tutela judicial, dilaci—n, recursos econ—micos y acceso de los ciudadanos a la justicia (The Suply and Demand of the Courts Services: Empirical Evidence)’, in Comisi—n General de Codificaci—n (ed.), Materiales para una reforma procesal , Ministerio de Justicia, 87-353.
  • Pastor, Santos (1991), ‘Gasto pœblico en justicia: una nota comparativa (Gorvernment Expenditure in the Court System: Comparative Evidence)’, 3 Presupuesto y Gasto Pœblico , 115-120.
  • Pastor, Santos (1993), ‘Composici—n, Estructura y Caracter’sticas de la Litigiosidad Contencioso-Administrativa: Un An‡lisis Muestral (Litigation in Contentious-Administrative Courts. An Empirical Analysis)’, 111 Bolet’n de Informaci—n del Consejo General del Poder Judicial , 205-288.
  • Pastor, Santos (1996), ‘El impacto econ—mico de la reforma (The Economic Impact of Judicial Reform)’, in X (ed.), Banco Mundial, Reforma Judicial y Desarrollo Econ—mico, en prensa .
  • Pedraja, Francisco and Javier Salinas (1995), ‘La eficiencia de la Justicia (The Efficiency of the Contentious-Administrative Courts)’, 8 Revista de Econom’a Aplicada , 163-196.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1973), ‘An Economic Approach to Legal Procedure and Judicial Administration’, 2 Journal of Legal Studies , 399-458.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1983), ‘Will the Federal Courts of Appeals Survive until 1984? An Essay on Delegation and Specialization of the Judicial Function’, 56 Southern California Law Review , 761-791.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1984), ‘The Meaning of Judicial Self- Restraint’, 59 Indiana Law Journal , 1-24.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1985), The Federal Courts: Crisis and Reform , Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 365 p.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1986), ‘The Summary Jury Trial and Other Methods of Alternative Dispute Resolution: Some Cautionary Observations’, 53 University of Chicago Law Review , 366-393.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1989), ‘Coping with the Caseload: A Comment on Magistrates and Masters’, 137 University of Pennsylvania Law Review , 2215-2218.
  • Priest, George L. (1989), ‘Private Litigants and the Court Congestion Problem’, 69 Boston University Law Review , 527-559.
  • Ramseyer, J. Mark (1994), ‘The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach’, 23 Journal of Legal Studies , 721-747.
  • Rasmusen, Eric (1994), ‘Judicial Legitimacy as a Repeated Game’, 10 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization , 63-83.
  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1992), ‘Judicial Review and the Power of the Purse’, 12 International Review of Law and Economics , 191-208.
  • Rubin, Paul H. (1983), ‘The Objectives of Private and Public Judges: Comment’, Public Choice , 133-137.
  • Ryssdal, Stray A.C. (1995), An Economic Analysis of Civil Suits and Appels , Oslo, Juridisk Forlag.
  • Scheiner, Alan Howard (1991), ‘Judicial Assessment of Punitive Damages, the Seventh Amandment, and the Politics of Jury Power’, 91 Columbia Law Review , 142-226.
  • Shanley, Michael G. (1991), ‘The Distribution of Posttrial Adjustements to Jury Awards’, 20 Journal of Legal Studies , 463-481.
  • Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau (1990), Doelmatig Rechtspreken (Efficient Administration of Justice], S.C.P., Cahier no. 88) , s-Gravenhage, Staatsdrukkerij, 1990 p.
  • Spiller, Pablo T. (1992), ‘Rationality, Decision Rules, and Collegial Courts: Commentary’, 12 International Review of Law and Economics , 186-190.
  • Spiller, Pablo T. and Spitzer, Matthew L. (1995), ‘Where Is the Sin in Sincere? Sophisticated Manipulation of Sincere Judicial Voters (With Applications to Other Voting Environments).’, 11 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization , 32-63.
  • Straussman, Jeffrey D. (1986), ‘Courts and Public Purse Strings: Have Portraits of Budgeting Missed Something?’, 4 Public Administration Review , 315-351.
  • Williams, Philip L. and Williams, Ross A. (1994), ‘The Cost of Civil Litigation: An Empirical Study’, 14 International Review of Law and Economics , 73-86.
  • Williams, Philip L., Goldsmith, Andrew J., Williams, Ross A. and Browne, Patricia A. (1991), The AIJA Project on the Cost Benefit Efficiency of the Practice and Procedure of Civil Litigation in Australia , Papers Presented at the Ninth Annual AIJA Conference, Melbourne, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration.
  • Williams, Philip L., Williams, Ross A., Goldsmith, Andrew J. and Browne, Patricia A. (1992), The Cost of Civil Ligitation before Intermediate Courts in Australia , Melbourne, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration.
Copied to clipboard