Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Encyclopedia of Law & Economics – 6200 Takings

  • Adelstein, Richard P. (1974), ‘Just Compensation and the Assassin’s Bequest: A Utilitarian Approach’, 122 University of Pennsylvania Law Review , 1012-1032.
  • Baxter, W. and Altree, L. (1972), ‘Legal Aspects of Airport Noise’, 15 Journal of Law and Economics , 1-113.
  • Been, Vicki (1991), ‘”Exit” as a Constraint of Land Use Exactions: Rethinking the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine’, 91 Columbia Law Review , 473-545.
  • Benson, Bruce L. (1992), ‘The Development of Criminal Law and Its Enforcement: Public Interest or Political Transfers’, 3 Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines , 79-108.
  • Benson, Bruce L. (1994), ‘Emerging From the Hobbesian Jungle: Might Takes and Makes Rights’, 5 Constitutional Political Economy , 129-158. Reprinted inTranslated into Spanish and republished (1995) Las Instituciones y Los Derechos de Propiedad al Emerger de la Jungla Hobbesiana: La Fuerza Quita los Reprinted Derechos y los Crea Libertas, 12, 35-75.
  • Berger, L. (1991), ‘Inclusionary Zoning as Takings: The Legacy of the Mount Laurel Cases’, 70 Nebraska Law Review , 186-228.
  • Blume, L. and Rubinfeld, D. (1984), ‘Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis’, 72 California Law Review , 569-624.
  • Blume, L. and Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1987), ‘Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis’, 10 Research in Law and Economics , 53-104.
  • Blume, L., Rubinfeld, Daniel L. and P. Shapiro (1984), ‘The Taking of Land: When Should Compensation Be Paid?’, 99 Quarterly Journal of Economics , 71-92.
  • Blume, Lawrence E. and Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1984), ‘Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis’, 72 California Law Review , 569-628. Reprinted in 10 Research in Law and Economics, 1987, 53-103.
  • Bouckaert, Boudewijn and De Geest, Gerrit (1995), ‘Private Takings, Private Taxes, Private Compulsory Services: The Economic Doctrine of Quasi Contracts’, 15 International Review of Law and Economics , 463-487.
  • Bromley, D. (1993), ‘Regulatory Takings: Coherent Concept or Logical Contradiction?’, 17 (3) Vermont Law Review , 647-682.
  • Bromley, Daniel W. (1993), ‘Regulatory Takings: Coherent Concept or Logical Contradiction’, 17 Vermont Law Review , 647-682.
  • Buchanan, James M. (1972), ‘Politics, Property, and the Law: An Alternative Interpretation of Miller et al. v. Schoene’, 15 Journal of Law and Economics , 439-452.
  • Burrows, Paul (1989), ‘Getting a Stranglehold with the Eminant Domain Clause’, 9 International Review of Law and Economics , 129-147.
  • Burrows, Paul (1991), ‘Compensation for Compulsory Acquisition’, 67 Land Economics , 49-63.
  • Cohen, Lloyd R. (1991), ‘Holdouts and Free Riders’, 20 Journal of Legal Studies , 351-362.
  • Connors, C. (1990), ‘Back to the Future: The “Nuisance Exception” to the Just Compensation Clause’, 19 Capital University Law Review , 139-185.
  • Disheroon, F. (1993), ‘After Lucas: No More Wetland Takings?’, 13(3) Vermont Law Review , 683-693.
  • Dudley, B. and MacDonald, J. (1995), ‘Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, Takings, and the Search for the Common Good’, 33 American Business Law Journal , 153-178.
  • Durham, James Geoffrey (1985), ‘Efficient Just Compensation as a Limit on Eminent Domain’, 69 Minnesota Law Review , 1277-1313.
  • Echeverria, J. and S. Dennis. (1993), ‘The Takings Issue and the Due Process Clause: A Way Out of a Doctrinal Confusion’, 17(3) Vermont Law Review , 695-721.
  • Epstein, R. (1992), ‘Ruminations on Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council: An Introduction on Amicus Curiae Brief’, 25 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review , 1225-1232.
  • Epstein, R., Mellor, W. III, Bolick, C., Emord, J. and Bullock, S. (1992), ‘David Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council: Brief for the Institute for Justice as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner’, 25 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review , 1233-1258.
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1985), Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain , Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 362 p.
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1987), ‘Takings: Descent and Resurrection’, Supreme Court Review , 1-45.
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1992), ‘Ruminations on Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council: An Introduction to Amicus Curiae Brief’, 25 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review , 1225-1232.
  • Epstein, Richard A., W., Mellor III. C., Bolick, J. Emord and S. Bullock. (1992), ‘David Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council: Brief for the Institute for Justice as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner’, 25 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review , 1233-1258.
  • Farber, Daniel A. (1992), ‘Economic Analysis and Just Compensation’, 12 International Review of Law and Economics , 125-138.
  • Fischel, Wiliam A. (1992), ‘Exploring the Kozinsky Paradox: Why is More Efficient Regulation a Taking of Property?’, 67 Chicago-Kent Law Review , 865-912.
  • Fischel, William A. (1987), ‘The Economics of Land Use Exactions: A Property Rights Analysis’, 50 Law and Contemporary Problems , 101-113. Reprinted in Stein, Jay M. (Ed.), Classic Readings in Real Estate and Development, Washington, DC, ULI–the Urban Land Institute, 1996.
  • Fischel, William A. (1988), ‘Introduction: Utilitarian Balancing and Formalism in Takings’, 88 Columbia Law Review , 1581-1599.
  • Fischel, William A. (1991), ‘Exploring the Kozinski Paradox: Why Is More Efficient Regulation a Taking of Property?’, 67(3) Chicago-Kent Law Review , 865-912.
  • Fischel, William A. (1995), Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics, and Politics , Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.
  • Fischel, William A. (1995), ‘The Offer/Ask Disparity and Just Compensation for Takings: A Constitutional Choice Perspective’, 15 International Review of Law and Economics , 187-203.
  • Fischel, William A. (1996), ‘The Political Economy of Just Compensation: Lessons from the Military Draft for the Takings Issue’, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy .
  • Fischel, William A. and Shapiro, Perry (1989), ‘A Constitutional Choice Model of Compensation for Takings’, 9 International Review of Law and Economics , 115-128.
  • Fishel, William A. and Shapiro, Perry (1988), ‘Takings, Insurance and Michelman: Comments on Economic Interpretations of “Just Compensation” Law’, 17 Journal of Legal Studies , 269-293. Reprinted in Robert Ellickson, Carol Rose, and Bruce Ackerman (Eds.), Perspectives on Property Law, 2d ed., 514-530, Boston, Little Brown, 1995.
  • Fisher, W. III. (1988), ‘The Significance of Public Perceptions of the Takings Doctrine’, 88 Columbia Law Review , 1774-1794.
  • Fisher, W. III. (1993), ‘The Trouble with Lucas’, 45 Stanford Law Review , 1393-1410.
  • Francis, L (1984), ‘Eminent Domain Compensation in Western States’, Utah Law Review , 429-484.
  • Frech, H. Edward III (1982), ‘The California Coastal Commissions: Economic Impacts’, in Johnson, Bruce M. (ed.), Resolving the Housing Crisis: Government Policy, Decontrol and the Public Interest , Ballinger, 259-274.
  • Frech, H.Edward III and Lafferty, Ronald N. (1976), ‘The Economic Impact of the California Coastal Commission: Land Use and Land Values’, in Johnson, Bruce M. (ed.), The California Coastal Plan: A Critique , Institute for Contemporary Studies, 69-91.
  • Frech, H.Edward III and Lafferty, Ronald N. (1978), ‘Community Environment and the Market Value of Single-Family Homes: The Effect of Dispersion of Land Uses’, 21 Journal of Law and Economics , 381-396.
  • Freyer, T. (1981), ‘Reassessing the Impact of Eminent Domain in Early American Economic Development’, Wisconsin Law Review , 1263-1286.
  • Friedman, L. (1986), ‘A Search for Seizure: Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon in Context’, 4 Law and History Review , 1-22.
  • Gecker, Frances F. (1987), ‘Comment: The Recovery of Opportunity Costs as Just Compensation: A Takings Analysis of Adequate Protection’, 81 Northwestern University Law Review , 953-1025.
  • Ghosh, Shubha (1997), ‘Takings, the Exit Option and Just Compensation’, 17 International Review of Law and Economics , 157-176.
  • Goldberg, Victor P., Merrill T. and D. Unumb. (1987), ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of Eminent Domain: Valuing and Apportioning Condemnation Awards Between Landlord and Tenant’, 34 UCLA Law Review , 1083-1137.
  • Goldberg, Victor P., Merrill, Thomas W. and Unumb, Daniel (1987), ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of Eminent Domain: Valuing and Apportioning Condemnation Awards Between Landlord and Tenant’, 34 UCLA Law Review , 1083-1137.
  • Grofman, Bernard and Wittman, Donald A. (eds.) (1989), The Federalist Papers: The New Institutionalism and the Old , Agathon Press.
  • Hermalin, Benjamin E. (1995), ‘An Economic Analysis of Takings’, 11 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization , 64-86.
  • Hippler, T. (1987), ‘Reexamining 100 Years of Supreme Court Regulatory Taking Doctrine: The Principles of “Noxious Use”, “Average reciprocity of Advantage”, “and “Bundle of Rights” for Mugler to Keystone Bituminous Coal’, 14 Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review , 653-727.
  • Innes, R. (1994), Takings, Compensation and Equal Protection for Owners of Developed and Undeveloped Land. Mimeo , University of Arizona.
  • Innes, R. (1995), ‘An Essay on Takings: Concepts and Issues’, 4 Choices .
  • Johnson, M. Bruce (1977), ‘Planning without Prices: A Discussion of Land Use Regulation Without Compensation’, in Siegan, Bernard H. (ed.), Planning Without Prices , Lexington (MA), Lexington Books, 63-111.
  • Kaplow, Louis (1986), ‘An Economic Analysis of Legal Transitions’, 99 Harvard Law Review , 509-617.
  • Kaplow, Louis (1987), Optimal Transition Policy: Replacing Horizontal Equity with an Ex Ante Incentives Perspective , Dissertation accepted by Harvard University Department of Economics.
  • Kaplow, Louis (1992), ‘Government Relief for Risk Associated with Government Action’, 94 Scandinavian Journal of Economics , 525-541.
  • Kmiec, D. (1981), ‘Regulatory Takings: The Court Runs Out of Gas in San Diego’, 57 Indiana Law Journal , 45-81.
  • Kmiec, D. (1988), ‘The Original Understanding of the Taking Clause is Neither Weak Nor Obtuse’, 88 Columbia Law Review , 1630-1666.
  • Knetsch, J. (1983), Property Rights and Compensation: Compulsory Acquisitions and Other Losses , Toronto, Butterworths.
  • Knetsch, J. and T. Borcherding (1979), ‘Expropriation of Private Property and the Basis for Compensation’, 29 University of Toronto Law Journal , 237-252.
  • Knetsch, Jack L. (1990), ‘Environmental Policy Implications of Disparities between Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded Measures of Values’, 18 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 227-237.
  • La Croix, Summer and Rose, L. (1995), ‘Public Use, Just Compensation, and Land Reform in Hawaii’, Research in Law and Economics , 17 ff.
  • Levmore, Saul (1990), ‘Just Compensation and Just Politics’, 22 Connecticut Law Review , 285-322.
  • Levmore, Saul (1991), ‘Takings, Torts, and Special Interests’, 77 Virginia Law Review , 1333-1368.
  • Levmore, Saul and Stuntz, William J. (1990), ‘Remedies and Incentives in Private and Public Law: A Comparative Essay’, Wisconsin Law Review , 483-499.
  • Lodise, John P. (1988), ‘Retroactive Compensation and the Illusion of Economic Efficiency: An Analysis of the First English Decision’, 35 UCLA Law Review , 1267-1290.
  • Lunney, G. (1992), ‘A Critical Reexamination of the Takings Jurisprudence’, 90 Michigan Law Review , 1892-1965.
  • MacKaay, Ejan (1987), ‘Le paradoxe des droits acquis (The Paradox of Acquired Rights)’, in X (ed.), De “l’ancienne” ˆ la “nouvelle” Žconomie. Essais ˆ l’occasion de la dixime universitŽ d’ŽtŽ de la nouvelle Žconomie , Aix-en-Provence, Librairie de l’UniversitŽ, 205-219.
  • MacKaay, Ejan (1991), ‘La propriŽtŽ est-elle en voie d’extinction? (Is Property about to Become Extinct?)’, in Mackaay, Ejan (ed.), Nouvelles technologies et propriŽtŽ , MontrŽal, ƒd. ThŽmis, Paris, LITEC, 217-247.
  • Mandelker, D. (1987), ‘Investment-Backed Expectations: Is There a Taking?’, 31 Journal of Urban and Contemporary Problems , 3-43.
  • Manheim, K. (1989), ‘Tenant Eviction and the Takings Clause’, Wisconsin Law Review , 925-1019.
  • McKenzie, Richard B. (1986), ‘Eminent Domain: A New Industrial Policy Tool’, 142 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 27-38.
  • Medema, S. (1992), ‘Making Choices and Making Law: An Institutional Perspective on the Taking Issue’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Taking Property and Just Compensation: Law and Economics Perspectives of the Takings Issue , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1992), ‘Probing the Legal-Economic Nexus: Takings, 1978-1988’, 26 Journal of Economic Issues , 525-534.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1992), ‘Making Choices and Making Law: An Institutional Perspective on the Taking Issue’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Legal Economic Perspectives on the Taking Issue , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 45-77.
  • Mercuro, Nicholas (1992), ‘The Takings Issue: A Continuing Dilemma in Law and Economics’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Taking Property and Just Compensation: Law and Economics Perspectives of the Takings Issue , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1-23.
  • Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.) (1992), Taking Property and Just Compensation: Legal and Economics Perspectives of the Takings Issue , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Mercuro, Nicholas and Ryan, Thimothy P. (1980), ‘Property Rights and Welfare Economics: Miller et al. v. Schoene Revisited: Reply’, 56(2) Land Economics , 202-212.
  • Mercuro, Nicholas and Ryan, Thimothy P. (1981), ‘Property Rights and Welfare Economics: Miller et al. v. Schoene Revisited: Reply’, 57(4) Land Economics , 657-659.
  • Merrill, T. (1986), ‘The Economics of Public Use’, 72 Cornell Law Review , 61-116.
  • Merrill, T. (1986), ‘Rent Seeking and the Compensation Principle’, 80 Northwestern Law Review , 1561-1589.
  • Miceli, Thomas J. (1991), ‘Compensation for the Taking of Land Under Eminent Domain’, 147 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 354-363.
  • Miceli, Thomas J. and Segerson, Kathleen (1994), ‘Regulatory Takings: When Should Compensation Be Paid?’, 23 Journal of Legal Studies , 749-776.
  • Miceli, Thomas J. and Segerson, Kathleen (1995), ‘Government Regulation and Compensation for Takings: Implications for Agriculture’, 77 American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 1177-1182.
  • Miceli, Thomas J. and Segerson, Kathleen (1996), Compensation for Regulatory Takings: An Economic Analysis with Applications , Greenwood, JAI Press.
  • Miceli, Thomas J. and Segerson, Kathleen (1996), Compensation for Regulatory Takings: An Economic Analysis with Applications , Greenwood, JAI Press.
  • Michelman, Frank I. (1967), ‘Property, Utility and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of “Just Compensation” Law’, 80 Harvard Law Review , 1165-1258. Reprinted in Ackerman, Bruce A. (ed.), Economic Foundations of Property a Law, Boston, Little Brown, 1975, 100 ff.
  • Michelman, Frank I. (1988), ‘Takings’, 88 Columbia Law Review , 1600-1629.
  • Munch, Patricia (1976), ‘An Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain’, 84 Journal of Political Economy , 473-497.
  • Paul, E. (1987), Property Rights and Eminent Domain , New Brunswick (NJ), Transaction.
  • Paul, Ellen Frankel (1987), ‘Public Use: A Vanishing Limitation on Governmental Takings’, in Dorn, James A. and Manne, Henry G. (eds.), Economic Liberties and the Judiciary , Fairfax, George Mason University Press, 357-373.
  • Peterson, Andrew A. (1989), ‘The Takings Clause: In Search of Underlying Principles’, 77 California Law Review , 1299-1363.
  • Poirier, M. (1993), ‘Takings and Natural Hazards Policy: Public Choice on the Beachfront’, 46 Rutgers Law Review , 243-347.
  • Rose, Carol M. (1984), ‘Mahon Reconstructed: Why the Takings Issue is Still a Muddle’, 57 Southern California Law Review , 561-599.
  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1988), ‘Against Ad Hocery: A Comment on Michelman’, 88 Columbia Law Review , 1697-1711.
  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1992), ‘Regulatory Takings: Policy Analysis and Democratic Principles’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Taking Property and Just Compensation: Law and Economics Perspectives of the Takings Issue , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 25-44.
  • Ross, Thomas W. (1994), ‘Raising an Army: A Positive Theory of Military Recruitment’, 37 Journal of Law and Economics , 109-131.
  • Rowley, Charles K. (1992), ‘The Supreme Court and Takings Judgments: Constitutional Political Economy versus Public Choice’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Taking Property and Just Compensation: Law and Economics Perspectives of the Takings Issue , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 79-124.
  • Rubenfeld, J. (1993), ‘Usings’, 102 Yale Law Journal , 1077-1163.
  • Runge, C. (1993), ‘Economic Implications of Wider Compensation for “Takings” or, What if Agricultural Policies Ruled the World?’, 17 Vermont Law Review , 723-739.
  • Samuels, Warren G. and Mercuro, Nicholas (1979), ‘The Role and Resolution of the Compensation Principle in Society, Part I – the Role’, 1 Research in Law and Economics , 157-194.
  • Samuels, Warren J. (1974), ‘Commentary: An Economic Perspective on the Compensation Problem’, 21 Wayne Law Review , 113-134. Reprinted in Samuels, Warren J. and Schmid, A. Allen (eds.), Law and Economics: An Institutional Perspective, Boston, Nijhoff, 1981, 188-209.
  • Samuels, Warren J. and Mercuro, Nicholas (1979), ‘The Role and Resolution of the Compensation Principle in Society: Part One — The Role’, 1 Research in Law and Economics , 157-194.
  • Samuels, Warren J. and Mercuro, Nicholas (1980), ‘The Role and Resolution of the Compensation Principle in Society: Part Two — The Resolution’, 2 Research in Law and Economics , 103-128.
  • Sax, Joseph L. (1964), ‘Takings and the Police Power’, 74 Yale Law Journal , 36-76.
  • Sax, Joseph L. (1971), ‘Takings, Private Property and Public Rights’, 81 Yale Law Journal , 149-186. Reprinted in Ackerman, Bruce A. (ed.), Economic Foundations of Property a Law, Boston, Little Brown, 1975, 146-158.
  • Schill, M. (1989), ‘Intergovernmental Takings and Just Compensation: A Question of Federalism’, 137 University of Pennsylvania Law Review , 829-901.
  • Siegan, Bernard H. (1972), Land Use Without Zoning , Lexington (MA), Lexington Books.
  • Stake, Jeffrey E. (1995), ‘Loss Aversion and Involuntary Transfers of Title’, in Malloy, Robin P. and Braun, Christopher K. (eds.), Law and Economics: New and Critical Perspectives , New York, Peter Lang, 331-360.
  • Stein, G (1995), ‘Regulatory Takings and Ripeness in Federal Courts’, 48 Vanderbilt Law Review , 1-99.
  • Stoebuck, W. (1969), ‘The Property Right of Access versus the Power of Eminent Domain’, 47 Texas Law Review , 733-765.
  • Stoebuck, W. (1972), ‘A General Theory of Eminent Domain’, 47 Washington Law Review , 553-608.
  • Swank, W. (1976), ‘Note. Inverse Condemnation: The Case for Diminution in Property Values as Compensable Damage’, 28 Stanford Law Review , 779-804.
  • Symposium (1988), ‘Symposium on Takings’, 88 Columbia Law Review , 1581-1794.
  • Thompson, B. (1990), ‘Judicial Takings’, 76 Virginia Law Review , 1449-1544.
  • Tideman, T. Nicolaus (1988), ‘Takings, Moral Evolution, and Justice’, 88 Columbia Law Review , 1714-1730.
  • Tiefer, C. (1996), ‘Controlling Federal Agencies by Claims on Their Appropriations? the Takings Bill and the Power of the Purse.’, 13(2) Yale Journal on Regulation , 501-534.
  • Treanor, W. (1985), ‘The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment’, 94 Yale Law Journal , 694-716.
  • Trefzger, J. and P. Colwell (1996), ‘Investor Efficiency in the Face of Takings’, 12(1) Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics , 23-35.
  • Ulen, Thomas S. (1992), ‘The Public Use of Private Property: A Dual Constraint Theory of Efficient Government Takings’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Taking Property and Just Compensation: Law and Economics Perspectives of the Takings Issue , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 163-198.
  • Werin, Lars (1978), ‘Expropriation – en studie i lagstiftningsmotiv och ersŠttningsrŠttsliga grundprinciper (Expropriation – A Study in Legislative Motives and Compensatory Basic Principles)’, Svensk Juristtidning , 81-120.
  • Wittman, Donald A. (1995), The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why political Institutions are Efficient , Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • Yandle, Bruce (1995), Land Rights: The 1990’s Property Rights Rebellion , Lanham (MD), Rowman and Littlefield.
Copied to clipboard