Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Encyclopedia of Law & Economics – 0730 The Coase Theorem

  • Aivazian, Varouj A. and Callen, Jeffrey L. (1980), ‘Uncertain Externalities, Liability Rules and Resource Allocation: Comment’, 70 American Economic Review , 1058-1059.
  • Aivazian, Varouj A. and Callen, Jeffrey L. (1981), ‘The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core’, 24 Journal of Law and Economics , 175-181.
  • Aivazian, Varouj A., Callen, Jeffrey L. and Lipnowski, Irwin F. (1988), ‘The Coase Theorem and Coalitional Stability’, 54 Economica , 517-520.
  • Allen, Douglas W. (1991), ‘What are Transaction Costs?’, 14 Research in Law and Economics , 1-18.
  • Allen, Douglas W. (1992), ‘Marriage and Divorce: Comment’, 82 American Economic Review , 679-685.
  • Allen, Douglas W. (1995), ‘Property Rights, Transaction Costs, and Coase: One More Time’, in Medema, Steven G. (ed.), Coasean Economics , Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Arrow, Kenneth J. (1969), ‘The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Nonmarket Allocation’, in X (ed.), Joint Economic Committee, 91st Congress of the United States, 1st Session .
  • Arrow, Kenneth J. (1979), ‘The Property Rights Doctrine and Demand Revelation under Incomplete Information’, in Boskin, Michael J. (ed.), Economics and Human Welfare: Essays in Honor of Tibor Scitovsky , New York, Academic Press, 23-39.
  • Ayres, Ian and Talley, Eric (1995), ‘Distinguishing Between Consensual and Nonconsensual Advantages of Liability Rules’, 105(1) Yale Law Journal , 235-253.
  • Ayres, Ian and Talley, Eric (1995), ‘Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement to Facilitate Coasean Trade’, 104 Yale Law Journal , 1027-1117.
  • Azqueta, Diego (1993), ‘The Coase Theorem and Environmental Economics: A Survey of Some Unsettled Issues’, 10(1) Revista Espa–ola de Econom’a , 59-71.
  • Baker, C. Edwin (1975), ‘The Ideology of the Economic Analysis of Law’, 5 Philosophy And Public Affairs , 3-48.
  • Barzel, Yoram (1989), Economic Analysis of Property Rights , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 122 p.
  • Baumol, William J. (1972), ‘On Taxation and the Control of Externalities’, 62 American Economic Review , 307-322.
  • Besen, Stanley M., Manning, Willard G., Jr. and Mitchell, Bridger M. (1978), ‘Copyright Liability for Cable Television: Compulsory Licensing and the Coase Theorem’, 21 Journal of Law and Economics , 67-95.
  • Besen, Stanley M., Manning, Willard G., Jr. and Mitchell,Bridger M. (1978), ‘Copyright Liability for Cable Television: Compulsory Licensing and the Coase Theorem’, 21 Journal of Law and Economics , 67-95.
  • Bigelow, John Payne (1993), ‘Inducing Efficiency: Externalities, Missing Markets, and the Coase Theorem’, 34(2) International Economic Review , 335-346.
  • Boettke, Peter J. (1989), ‘Information and the Coase Theorem: Comment’, 3 Journal of Economic Perspectives , 195-198.
  • Boitani, Andrea and Grillo, Michele (1992), ‘Some Reflections on Externalities, Coase Theorem and the Endogenous Determination of Property Rights’, 43 Metroeconomica , 309-326.
  • Boyd, J.H. and Mohring, H. (1971), ‘Externalities: ‘Direct Interaction’ vs. ‘Asset Utilization’ Frameworks’, 38 Economica , 347-361.
  • Bramhall, David F. and Mills, Edwin S. (1966), ‘A Note on the Asymmetry Between Fees and Payments’, 2 Water Resources Research , 615-616.
  • Brinig, Margaret F. and Buckley, Francis H. (1995), Divorce, Legal Rules, and Free Spirits , Mimeo, George Mason University School of Law.
  • Buchanan, James M. (1973), ‘The Institutional Structure of Externality’, 14 Public Choice , 69-82.
  • Buchanan, James M. (1973), ‘The Coase Theorem and the Theory of the State’, 13(4) Natural Resources Journal , 579-594.
  • Buchanan, James M. (1984), ‘Rights, Efficiency and Exchange: The Irrelevance of Transaction Costs’, in Neumann, M. (ed.), Ansprache, Eigentums- und VerfŸgungsrechte , Berlin, Duncker and Humblot, 9-24. Reprinted in Liberty, Market and State, Harvester Press, 1986 Reprinted in Medema, S.G. (ed.), (1995), “The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysis”, Volume II, Chapter 8, 175-190, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
  • Buchanan, James M. and Faith, Roger L. (1981), ‘Entrepreneurship and the Internalization of Externalities’, 24 Journal of Law and Economics , 95-111.
  • Buchanan, James M. and Stubblebine, W. Craig (1962), ‘Externality’, 29 Economica , 371-384.
  • Buchanan, James M. and Stubblebine, W. Graig (1962), ‘Externality’, 29 Economica , 371-384.
  • Buchanan, James M. and Tollison, Robert D. (1973), ‘The Coase Theorem and the Theory of the State’, 14 Natural Resources Journal , 579-594. Reprinted in Buchanan, James M and Tollison, Robert D. (eds.), The Theory of Public Choice II, Ann Arbor (MI), University of Michigan Press, 1984, 159-173.
  • Burrows, Paul (1970), ‘On External Costs and the Visible Arm of Law’, 22 Oxford Economic Papers , 39-56.
  • Calabresi, Guido (1965), ‘The Decision for Accidents: An Approach to Non-Fault Allocation for Costs’, 78 Harvard Law Review , 713-745.
  • Calabresi, Guido (1968), ‘Transaction Costs,Resource Allocation and Liability Rules: A Comment’, 11 Journal of Law and Economics , 67-73.
  • Calabresi, Guido (1991), ‘The Pointlessness of Pareto: Carrying Coase Further’, 100 Yale Law Journal , 1211-1237.
  • Calabresi, Guido and Melamed, A. Douglas (1972), ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’, 85 Harvard Law Review , 1089-1128. Reprinted in Ackerman, Bruce A., Economic Foundations of Property Law, Boston, Little Brown, 1975, 31-48.
  • Campbell, David (1996), ‘On What is Valuable in Law and Economics’, 8 Otago Law Review , 489-514.
  • Canterbery, E. Ray and Marvasti, A. (1992), ‘The Coase Theorem as a Negative Externality’, 26 Journal of Economic Issues , 1179-1189.
  • Chapman, Bruce (1982), ‘Individual Rights and Collective Rationality: Some Implications for Economic Analysis of Law’, 10 Hofstra Law Review , 455-481.
  • Chari, V. and Jones, L.R. (1991), A Reconsideration of the Problem of Social Cost: Free Riders and Monopolists , Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Staff Report, No. 59.
  • Chari, V. and Jones, L.R. (1991), ‘A Reconsideration of the Problem of Social Cost: Free Riders and Monopolists’, , 59-59.
  • Cheung, Steven N.S. (1969), The Theory of Share Tenancy , Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • Cheung, Steven N.S. (1969), A Theory of Share Tenancy , Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 188 p.
  • Cheung, Steven N.S. (1969), ‘Transaction Costs, Risk Aversion and the Choice of Contractual Arrangements’, 12 Journal of Law and Economics , 23-42.
  • Cheung, Steven N.S. (1970), ‘The Structure of a Contract and the Theory of a Non-exclusive Resource’, 13 Journal of Law and Economics , 49-70.
  • Cheung, Steven N.S. (1973), ‘The Fable of the Bees: An Economic Investigation’, 16 Journal of Law and Economics , 11-33.
  • Cheung, Steven N.S. (1974), ‘A Theory of Price Control’, 17 Journal of Law and Economics , 53-71.
  • Cheung, Steven N.S. (1978), The Myth of Social Costs: A Critique of Welfare Economics and the Implications for Public Policy , London, Institute of Economic Affairs, 93 p.
  • Cheung, Steven N.S. (1983), ‘The Contractual Nature of the Firm’, 26 Journal of Law and Economics , 1-21.
  • Cheung, Steven N.S. (1992), ‘On the New Institutional Economics’, in Werin, Lars and Wijkander, Hans (eds.), Contract Economics , Oxford, Blackwell, 48-65.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1937), ‘The Nature of the Firm’, 4 Economica , 368-405.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1959), ‘The Federal Communications Commission’, 2 Journal of Law and Economics , 1-40.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1960), ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, 3 Journal of Law and Economics , 1-44. Reprinted in Ackermann, Bruce A., Economic Foundations of Property Law,Boston,Little Brown,1975,17-22. Reprinted in Medema, Steven G.,The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysis,Vol.2,Aldershot,Edward Elgar Publishig, 1995, 5-48. Reprinted in Coase, Ronald H., The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1988.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1974), ‘The Lighthouse in Economics’, 23 Journal of Law and Economics , 357-376.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1974), ‘The Choice of the Institutional Framework: A Comment’, 17 Journal of Law and Economics , 493-496.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1981), ‘The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core: A Comment’, 24 Journal of Law and Economics , 183-187.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1988), The Firm, the Market and the Law , Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 217 p.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1988), ‘Blackmail’ (The 1987 McCorkle Lecture)’, 74 Virginia Law Review , 655-676.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1991), ‘The Institutional Structure of Production’, in Coase, Ronald H. (ed.), Essays on Economics and Economists , Chicago (IL), University of Chicago Press.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1993), ‘Introduction: Take Stock’, 36 Journal of Law and Economics , 239-254.
  • Coelho Philip R. P. (1975), ‘Externalities, Liability Separability and Resource Allocation : Comment’, 65 American Economic Review , 721-723.
  • Coelho, Philip R.P. (1975), ‘Externalities, Separability and Resource Allocation: Comment’, 65 American Economic Review , 721-723.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1980), ‘How the Law Circumvents Starret’s Nonconvexity’, 22 Journal of Economic Theory , 499-504.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1982), ‘The Cost of Coase’, 11 Journal of Legal Studies , 1-33. Reprinted in Donahue, Charles Jr., Kauper, Thomas E. and Martin, Peter W.,Property: An Introduction to the Concept and the Institution,1992. Reprinted in Ackerman, Bruce, Ellickson, Robert and Rose, Carol, Foundations of Property Law, 1995. Medema, Steven G., The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysis, Aldershot, Edward Elgar Publishing, 96-128.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1987), ‘The Coase Theorem’, in Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray and Newman, Peter (eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics , London, MacMillan, 457-460. Reprinted inThe New Palgrave World of Economics (forthcoming).
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1989), ‘The Coase Theorem’, in Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray and Newman, Peter (eds.), The New Palgrave: Allocation, Information, and Markets , New York, W.W. Norton, 64-70.
  • Cooter, Robert D. and Ulen, Thomas S. (1988), Law and Economics , Glenview (IL), Scott Foresman.
  • Cooter, Robert D., Marks, Stephen V. and Mnookin, Robert H. (1982), ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior’, 11 Journal of Legal Studies , 225-251. Reprinted in Coleman, Jules and Lange, Jeffrey (Eds.), Law and Economics, Volume 2, New York, University Press, 1992.
  • Cotter, Thomas F. (1995), ‘Owning What Doesn’t Exist, Where It Doesn’t Exist: Rethinking Two Doctrines from the Common Law of Trademarks’, 3 University of Illinois Law Review , 487-541.
  • Cotter, Thomas F. (1996), ‘Legal Pragmatism and the Law and Economics Movement’, 84 Georgetown Law Journal , 2071-2141.
  • Coursey, Don L. and Stanley, L.R. (1988), ‘Pretrial Bargaining Behavior within the Shadow of the Law: Theory and Experimental Evidence’, 8 International Review of Law and Economics , 161-179.
  • Coursey, Don L., Hoffman, Elizabeth and Spitzer, Matthew L. (1987), ‘Fear and Loathing in the Coase Theorem: Experimental Tests Involving Physical Discomfort’, 16 Journal of Legal Studies , 217-248.
  • Crain, W. Mark, Saurman, David S. and Tollison, Robert D. (1978), ‘The Coase Theorem and Quasi Rents: Correcting the Record’, 6 Public Finance Quarterly , 259-262.
  • Crain, W. Mark, Sawman, D. and Tollison, Robert D. (1978), ‘The Coase Theorem and Quasi Rents: Correcting the Record’, 6 Public Finance Quarterly , 259-264.
  • Crespi, Gregory Scott (1991), ‘The Mid-Life Crisis of the Law and Economics Movement: Confronting the Problems of Nonfalsifiability and Normative Bias’, 67(2) Notre Dame Law Review , 231-252.
  • d’ Arge, Ralph C. (1973), ‘Coase Theorem Symposium’, 13 Natural Resources Journal , 557-560.
  • D’arge, Ralph C. (1973), ‘Coase Theorem Symposium’, 13(4) Natural Resources Journal , 557-560.
  • Dahlman, Carl J. (1979), ‘The Problem of Externality’, 22 Journal of Law and Economics , 141-162.
  • Daly, George (1974), ‘The Coase Theorem: Assumptions, Applications and Ambiguities’, 12(2) Economic Inquiry , 203-213.
  • Daly, George and Giertz, J. Fred (1975), ‘Externalities,Extortion and Efficiency’, 65 American Economic Review , 997-1001.
  • Davis, Otto A. and Whinston, Andrew B. (1962), ‘Externalities, Welfare and the Theory of Games’, 70 Journal of Political Economy , 241-262.
  • Davis, Otto A. and Whinston, Andrew B. (1965), ‘Some Notes on Equating Private and Social Cost’, 32 Southern Economic Journal , 113-126.
  • Demsetz, Harold (1971), ‘Theoretical Efficiency in Pollution Control: Comments on Comments’, 9 Western Economic Journal , 444-446.
  • Demsetz, Harold (1972), ‘When Does the Rule of Liability Matter ?’, 1 Journal of Legal Studies , 13-28.
  • Demsetz, Harold (1972), ‘Wealth Distribution and the Ownership of Rights’, 1 Journal of Legal Studies , 223-232.
  • Demsetz, Harold (1978), ‘On Extortion: A Reply’, 68 American Economic Review , 417-418.
  • DeSerpa, Allan C. (1977), ‘The Coase Theorem: A Diagrammatic Presentation’, 15 Economic Inquiry , 600-604.
  • DeSerpa, Allan C. (1992), ‘The Pure Economics of the Coase Theorem’, 18 Eastern Economic Journal , 287-304.
  • Dick, Daniel T. (1976), ‘The Voluntary Approach to Externality Problems: A Survey of the Critics’, 2 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 185-195.
  • Dolbear, F. Trenery, Jr. (1967), ‘On the Theory of Optimum Externality’, 57 American Economic Review , 90-103.
  • Dolbear, F. Trenery, Jr. (1974), ‘Externalities as Commodities: Comment’, 64 American Economic Review , 341-343.
  • Donohue, John J. III (1988), ‘Law and Economics: The Road not Taken’, 22 Law and Society Review , 903-926.
  • Donohue, John J. III (1989), ‘Diverting the Coasian River: Incentive Schemes to Reduce Unemployment Spells’, 99 Yale Law Journal , 549-609.
  • Donohue, John J. III (1989), ‘Reply to Professors Ellickson and Stigler’, 99 Yale Law Journal , 635-636.
  • Eggertsson, Thrainn (1990), Economic Behaviour and Institutions , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 385 p.
  • Ellickson, Robert C. (1986), ‘Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution among Neighbors in Shasta County;’, 38 Stanford Law Review , 623-687. Reprinted in 18 Land Use and Environment Law Review, 1987, 79-143..
  • Ellickson, Robert C. (1989), ‘The Case for Coase and Against “Coaseanism”‘, 99 Yale Law Journal , 611-630.
  • Ellickson, Robert C. (1991), Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes , Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.
  • Endres, Alfred (1976), ‘Das Coase-Theorem bei langfristiger Betrachtung (The Coase Theorem in a Long Term Perspective)’, 27 Jahrbuch fŸr Sozialwissenschaft , 430-433.
  • Endres, Alfred (1977), ‘Die Coase-Kontroverse (The Coase Controversy)’, 133 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 637-651.
  • Farrell, Joseph (1987), ‘Information and the Coase Theorem’, 1(2) Journal of Economic Perspectives , 113-129.
  • Farrell, Joseph (1990), ‘Information and the Coase Theorem’, in Baker, Samuel H. and Elliot, Catherine S. (eds.), Readings in Public Sector Economics , Lexington (MA), Heath, 165-174.
  • Faure, Michael G. (1986), ‘Commentaar bij de paper van Dr.Jan C. Bongaerts: Coase en Produktenaansprakelijkheid (Comment on the paper of Dr. Jan C. Bongaerts: Coas)’, in Van Den Bergh, Roger (ed.), Verslagboek Eerste Werkvergadering Recht en Economie , Antwerpen, Leerstoel A. Van Melkebeke, Handelshogeschool, 31-37.
  • Feldman, Robert (1974), ‘Liability Rules and the Transfer of Economic Rents’, 3 Journal of Legal Studies , 499-508.
  • Fischel, William A. (1978), ‘A Property Rights Approach to Municipal Zoning’, 54 Land Economics , 54-81. Reprinted in Beaton, Patrick W. (Ed.), Municipal Expenditures, Revenues and Services, New Brunswick, Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research, 1983.
  • Fischel, William A. (1985), The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls , Baltimore (MD), John Hopkins University Press, 372 p.
  • Fischer, Stanley (1977), ‘Long Term Contracting, Sticky Prices, and Monetary Policy’, 3 Journal of Monetary Economics , 317-323.
  • Frank, Robert H. (1991), Microeconomics and Behavior , New York, McGraw-Hill, 694 p.
  • Frech, H. Edward III (1973), ‘Pricing of Pollution: The Coase Theorem in the Long Run’, 4(1) Bell Journal of Economics , 316-319.
  • Frech, H. Edward III (1973), ‘Biological Externalities and Evolution: A Comment’, 39 Journal of Theoretical Biology , 669-672.
  • Frech, H. Edward III (1979), ‘The Extended Coase Theorem and Long Run Equilibrium: The Non-Equivalence of Liability Rules and Property Rights’, 27(1) Economic Inquiry , 254-268.
  • Frey, Bruno S. (1993), ‘Review of: Environment and economy: Property rights and public policy’, 31 Journal of Economic Literature , 1442-1443.
  • Friedberg, Leora (1995), Did No-Fault Divorce Raise Divorce Rates? Evidence from Panel Data , Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Furubotn, Eirik G. (1995), ‘Income Transfers, Entrepreneurial Effort, and the Coase Theorem: The Case for Efficiency Reconsidered’, 2(2) European Journal of Law and Economics , 99-118.
  • Ghosh, Shubha (1997), ‘Takings, the Exit Option and Just Compensation’, 17 International Review of Law and Economics , 157-176.
  • Gifford, Adam, Jr. (1974), ‘Externalities and the Coase Theorem: A Graphical Analysis’, 14(4) Quarterly Review of Economics and Business , 7-21.
  • Gifford, Adam, Jr. (1975), ‘Externalities, Liability, Separability and Resource Allocation: Comment’, 65 American Economic Review , 724-727.
  • Gifford, Adam, Jr. and Stone, Courtney C. (1973), ‘Externalities,Liability and the Coase Theorem: A Mathematical Analysis’, 11 Western Economic Journal , 260-269.
  • Gjerdingen, Donald H. (1983), ‘The Coase Theorem and the Psychology of Common Law Thought’, 56 Southern California Law Review , 711-760.
  • Gjerdingen, Donald H. (1986), ‘The Politics of the Coase Theorem and Its Relationship to Modern Legal Thought’, 35 Buffalo Law Review , 871-935.
  • Glanter, Marc (1983), ‘Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don’t Know (and Think We Don’t Know) about Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society’, 31 UCLA Law Review , 4-71.
  • Goldberg, Victor P. (1974), ‘Institutional Change and the Quasi-Invisible Hand’, 17 Journal of Law and Economics , 461-492. Reprinted in Goldberg, Victor P. (ed.), Readings in the Economics of Contract Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,1989, 169-173.
  • Goldberg, Viktor P. (1974), ‘Institutional Change and the Quasi-Invisible Hand’, 17 Journal of Law and Economics , 461-492. Reprinted Goldberg, Viktor P.,Readings in Economics of Contract Law,Cambridge,University Press,169-173.
  • Gould, J.R. (1973), ‘Meade on External Economies: Should the Beneficiaries Be Taxed ?’, 16 Journal of Law and Economics , 53-66.
  • Gould, J.R. (1975), ‘Mohring and Boyd’s Objection to the Coase Theorem: A Note’, 42(166) Economica , 203-206.
  • Gould, John P. (1975), ‘Mohring and Boyd’s Objection to the Coase Theorem: A Note’, 42 Economica , 203-206.
  • Grady, Mark F. (1988), ‘Common Law Control of Strategic Behavior: The Railroad and the Farmer’, 17 Journal of Legal Studies , 15-42.
  • Greenwood, Peter H. and Ingene, Charles A. (1978), ‘Uncertain Externalities, Liability Rules and Resources Allocation’, 68 American Economic Review , 300-310.
  • Greenwood, Peter H. and Ingene, Charles A. (1980), ‘Reply’, 70 American Economic Review , 1060-1063.
  • Greenwood, Peter H., Ingene, Charles A. and Horsfied, James (1975), ‘Externalities,Separability and Resource Allocation’, 65 American Economic Review , 728-729.
  • Guellec, Dominique (1995), ‘Externalites et asymetries d’information dans un modele de croissance. (With English summary) (Externalities and Information Asymmetry in a Model of Growth)’, 46(3) Revue Žconomique , 837-846.
  • Hamilton, Jonathan H., Sheshinski, Eytan and Slutsky, Steven M. (1989), ‘Production Externalities and Long run Equilibria: Bargaining and Pigovian Taxation’, 27(3) Economic Inquiry , 453-471.
  • Hanley, Nick and Sumner, Charles (1995), ‘Bargaining Over Common Property Resources: Applying the Coase Theorem to Red Deer in the Scottish Highlands’, 43 Journal of Environmental Management , 87-95.
  • Hanneman, W. Michael (1991), ‘Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?’, 81 American Economic Review , 635-647.
  • Hansmann, Henry B. (1977), ‘The Coase Proposition, Information Constraints, and Long-Run Equilibrium: Comment’, 67 American Economic Review , 459-461.
  • Harris, Frederick H. (1990), ‘Economic Negligence, Moral Hazard, and the Coase Theorem’, 56(3) Southern Economic Journal , 698-704.
  • Harrison, Glenn W. (1987), ‘Coasian Solutions to the Externality Problem in Experimental Markets’, 97 Economic Journal , 388-3402.
  • Harrison, Glenn W. and McKee, Michael (1985), ‘Experimental Evaluation of the Coase Theorem’, 28 Journal of Law and Economics , 653-670.
  • Harrison, Glenn W. and McKee,Michael (1985), ‘Experimental Evaluation of the Coase Theorem’, 28 Journal of Law and Economics , 653-670.
  • Harrison, Glenn W. and others (1987), ‘Coasian Solutions to the Externality Problem in Experimental Markets’, 97 Economic Journal , 388-3402.
  • Hatzis, Aristides N. (1991), ‘Ronald H. Coase: Nobel Oikonomikon 1991’, 68 Epikentra , 77-84.
  • Head, John G. (1974), ‘Public Policies and Pollution Problems’, 33 Finanzarchiv , 1-29.
  • Hellner, Jan (1978), ‘RŠttsekonomi, avbestŠllning och Coase-teorem (Law and Economics, Cancellation and Coase Theorem)’, 24 Juridiska fšreningen i Lund .
  • Hoffman, Elizabeth and Spitzer, Matthew L. (1982), ‘The Coase Theorem: Some Experimental Tests’, 25 Journal of Law and Economics , 73-98.
  • Hoffman, Elizabeth and Spitzer, Matthew L. (1985), ‘Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects’ Concepts of Distributive Justice’, 14 Journal of Legal Studies , 259-297.
  • Hoffman, Elizabeth and Spitzer, Matthew L. (1986), ‘Experimental Tests of the Coase Theorem with Large Bargaining Groups’, 15 Journal of Legal Studies , 149-171.
  • Hoffman, Elizabeth and Spitzer, Matthew L. (1993), ‘Willingness to Pay vs. Willingness to Accept: Legal and Economic Implications’, 71 Washington University Law Quarterly , 59-114.
  • Hoffman, Philip T. (1989), ‘Institutions and Agriculture in Old Regime France’, 145 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 166-181.
  • Holderness, Clifford G. (1989), ‘The Assignment of Rights, Entry Effects, and the Allocation of Resources’, 18 Journal of Legal Studies , 181-189.
  • Homa, M. (1974), ‘Tentative Note on Liability Rules under the Coase System’, 24 Osaka Economic Papers , 86-97.
  • Hovenkamp, Herbert J. (1990), ‘Marginal Utility and the Coase Theorem’, 75 Cornell Law Review , 783-810.
  • Hsiung, Bingyuang (1993), ‘The Scale of the Market and the Scale of the Heart: Reconciling Coase and Buchanan on the Coase Theorem (In Chinese, with English summary)’, 21(2) Academia Economic Papers , 331-356.
  • Illing, Gerhard (1992), ‘Private Information as Transaction Costs: The Coase Theorem Revisited’, 148 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 558-576.
  • Inada, Ken I. and Kuga, Kigoshi (1973), ‘Limitations of the ‘Coase Theorem’ on Liability Rules’, 6(6) Journal of Economic Theory , 606-613.
  • Jaffe, Jeffrey F. (1975), ‘The ‘Coase Theorem’: A Re-examination and Comment’, 89 Quarterly Journal of Economics , 660-667.
  • Jaffe, Jeffrey F. (1975), ‘The “Coase Theorem”: A Reexamination Comment’, 89(4) Quarterly Journal of Economics , 660-661.
  • Johansen, L. (1979), ‘The Bargaining Society and the Inefficiency of Bargaining’, 32(3) Kyklos , 497-521.
  • Johnsen, D. Bruce (1992), ‘The Incentive Effects of Soft Dollar Brokerage’, in Lehn, Kenneth and Kamphuis, Robert (eds.), Modernizing US Securities Regulations: Economic and Legal Perspectives , 511-519.
  • Johnsen, D. Bruce (1994), ‘Property Rigths to Investment Tesearch: The Agency Costs of Soft Dollar Brokerage’, 11 Yale Journal on Regulation , 75-113.
  • Johnsen, D. Bruce, and (1995), ‘The Quasi-Rent Structure of Corporate Enterprise: A Transaction Cost Theory’, 44 Emory Law Journal , 1277 ff.
  • Johnson, David B. (1973), ‘Meade, Bees, and Externalities’, 16 Journal of Law and Economics , 35-52.
  • Johnston, Jason Scott (1990), ‘Law, Economics, and Post-Realist Explanation’, 24(5) Law and Society Review , 1217-1254.
  • Jung, Chulho and others (1995), ‘The Coase Theorem in a Rent Seeking Society’, 15 International Review of Law and Economics , 259-268.
  • Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1979), ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk’, 47 Econometrica , 263-291.
  • Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L. and Thaler, Richard H. (1990), ‘Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem’, 98 Journal of Political Economy , 1325-1348. Reprinted in Thaler, Richard H. (ed.), Quasi rational economics., New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1991, 167-188.
  • Kamien, M.I., Schwartz, Nancy L. and Dolbear, F. Trenery, Jr. (1966), ‘Asymmetry Between Bribes and Charges’, 2 Water Resources Research , 147-157.
  • Kanning, W. (1991), ‘Een non-cooperatieve benadering van het Coase-theorema (A Non Co-operative Approach to the Coase Theorem)’, in Coljee, P.D., Franken, H., Heertje, A. and Kanning, W. (eds.), Law and Welfare Economics , Amsterdam, VU Amsterdam, 39-48.
  • Kaplow, Louis and Shavell, Steven (1995), ‘Do Liability Rules Facilitate Bargaining? A Reply to Ayres and Talley’, 105(1) Yale Law Journal , 221-233.
  • Kaplow, Louis and Shavell, Steven (1996), ‘Property Rules versus Liability Rules: An Economic Analysis’, 109 Harvard Law Review , 713-790.
  • Kelman, Mark G. (1979), ‘Consumption Theory, Production Theory and Ideology in the Coase Theorem’, 52 Southern California Law Review , 669-698.
  • Kelman, Mark G. (1980), ‘Spitzer and Hoffman on Coase: A Brief Rejoinder’, 53 Southern California Law Review , 1215-1223.
  • Kelman, Mark G. (1985), ‘Comment on Hoffman and Spitzer’s Experimental Law and Economics’, 85 Columbia Law Review , 1037-1047.
  • Kessel, Reuben A. (1974), ‘Transfused Blood, Serum Hepatitis, and the Coase Theorem’, 17 Journal of Law and Economics , 265-289.
  • Kneese, Allan V. and Maller, Koran G. (1973), ‘Bribes and Charges in Pollution Control : An Aspect of the Coase Controversy’, 13 Natural Resources Journal , 677-704.
  • Labus Miroljub (1995), Osnovi ekonomije: Savremene teorije i primena (Foundation Economics: Contemporary Theories and Application) , Jugoslovenska knjiga, Belgrade.
  • Ledebut, L.C. (1967), ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, 26 American Journal of Economics and Sociology , 399-415.
  • Lesser, Jonathan A., Dobbs, Daniel and Zerbe, Richard O., Jr. (1966), Environmental Economics , Boston, Addison Wesley.
  • Levy, Daniel S. and Friedman, David D. (1994), ‘The Revenge of the Redwoods? Reconsidering Property Rights and the Economic Allocation of Natural Resources’, 61 University of Chicago Law Review , 493-526.
  • Liebermann, Yehoshua (1981), ‘The Coase Theorem in Jewish Law’, 10 Journal of Legal Studies , 293-303.
  • Liebhafsky, Harold H. (1973), ‘The Problem of Social Cost: An Alternative Approach’, 13 Natural Resources Journal , 615-676.
  • Lindgren, James (1989), ‘Blackmail: On Waste, Morals and Ronald Coase’, 36 UCLA Law Review , 597-608.
  • Lindoren, James (1990), ‘Ol’ Man River,… He Keeps on Rollin’ Along”: A Reply to Donohue’s Diverting the Coasean River’, 78 Georgetown Law Journal , 577-591.
  • Littlechild, Stephen C. (1978), ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, in Spadaro, Louis M. (ed.), New Directions in Austrian Economics , Kansas City, Sheed. Andres & McMeel, 77-93.
  • Macey, Jonathan R. (1988), ‘Transaction Costs and the Normative Elements of the Public Choice Model: An Application to Constitutional Theory’, 74 Virginia Law Review , 471-518.
  • Magnan De Bornier, Jean (1986), ‘The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core: A Re-examination’, 6 International Review of Law and Economics , 265-271.
  • Mailath,-George J. and Postlewaite, Andrew (1990), ‘Asymmetric Information Bargaining Problems with Many Agents’, 57(3) Review of Economic Studies , 351-367.
  • Majone, Giandomenico (1995), ‘The Development of Social Regulation in the European Community: Policy Externalities, Transaction Costs, Motivational Factors’, 50(1) Aussenwirtschaft , 79-109.
  • Maloney, Michael T. (1977), ‘The Coase Theorem and Long Run Industry Equilibrium: Note’, 17(4) Quarterly Review of Economics and Business , 113-118.
  • Marchand, James R. and Russell, Keith P. (1973), ‘Externalities, Liability, Separability, and Resource Allocation’, 63 American Economic Review , 611-620.
  • Marchand, James R. and Russell, Keith P. (1975), ‘Externalities, Liability, Separability, and Resource Allocation: Reply’, 65 American Economic Review , 730-732.
  • Martins, Manuel Victor (1992), ‘Ronald Coase: Na Fronteira de Economia e do Direito’, 2 Sub Judice , 29-30.
  • McEwin, R. Ian (1981), ‘Liability Rules, Insurance and the Coase Theorem’, 6 Australian Journal of Management , 103-117.
  • Meade, James E. (1952), ‘External Economies and Diseconomies in a Competitive Situation’, 62 Economic Journal , 54-67.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1994), Ronald H. Coase , London, MacMillan.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1995), The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysis. 2 vols , Aldershot, Edward Elgar.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1995), ‘Through A Glass Darkly, or Just Wearing Dark Glasses? Posin, Coase, and the Coase Theorem’, 62 Tennessee Law Review , 1041-1056.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1996), ‘The Coase Theorem’, in Coopera and Argyris (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Managerial Economics , Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1996), ‘Of Pangloss, Pigouvians, and Pragmatism: Ronald Coase on Social Cost Analysis’, 18 Journal of the History of Economic Thought , 96-114.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1996), ‘Comment: The Coase Theorem, Rent Seeking, and the Forgotten Footnote’, (forthc.) International Review of Law and Economics .
  • Medema, Steven G. (1997), ‘The Coase Theorem, Rent Seeking, and the Forgotten Footnote’, 17 International Review of Law and Economics , 177-178.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1997), ‘The Trial of Homo Economicus: What Law and Economics Tells Us about the Future of Economic Imperialism’, supp.27 XXXNew Economics and Its Writing: History of Political Economy Annual Supplement 27, forthcoming. .
  • Medema, Steven G. (ed.) (1995), The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysus ,.
  • Meran, Georg and Wolfstetter, Elmar (1987), ‘Optimal Risk Shifting vs Efficient Employment in Illyria: The Labor Managed Firm under Asymmetric Information’, 11(2) Journal of Comparative Economics , 163-179.
  • Miceli, Thomas J. and Sirmans, C.F. (1995), ‘The Economics of Land Transfer and Title Insurance’, 10 Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics , 81-88.
  • Mishan, Ezra J. (1965), ‘Reflections on Recent Developments in the Concept of External Effects’, 31 Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science , 3-34.
  • Mishan, Ezra J. (1967), ‘Pareto Optimality and the Law’, 19 Oxford Economic Papers , 255-287.
  • Mishan, Ezra J. (1971), ‘The Post-war Literature on Externalities: An Interpretative Essay’, 9 Journal of Economic Literature , 1-28.
  • Mishan, Ezra J. (1974), ‘The Economics of Disamenity’, 14 Natural Resources Journal , 55-86.
  • Mnookin, Robert H. and Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1979), ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce’, 88 Yale Law Journal , 950-997.
  • More, Daniel (197), ‘The Coase Theorem and the Reciprocal Nature of Land-Use Conflicts in Pollution Cases’, 4 Studies in Law, Tel Aviv University , 84-114.
  • Mumey, George A. (1971), ‘The Coase Theorem: A Reexamination’, 85 Quarterly Journal of Economics , 718-723.
  • Ng, Yew Kwang (1971), ‘Recent Developments in the Theory of Externality and the Pigovian Solution’, 47 Economic Record , 169-185.
  • Ng, Yew Kwang (1975), ‘Coase’s Theorem and First-party Priority Rule: Reply’, 51 Economic Record , 272-274.
  • Ng, Yew Kwang (1977), ‘Again on Externalities and Liability Rules: A Reply’, 53 Economic Record , 542-544.
  • North, Douglass C. (1981), Structure and Change in Economic History , New York, W.W. Norton.
  • Norton, Seth W. (1987), ‘The Coase Theorem and Suboptimization in Marketing Channels’, 6(3) Marketing Science , 268-285.
  • Nutter, Warren G. (1968), ‘The Coase Theorem on Social Cost: A Footnote’, 11 Journal of Law and Economics , 503-507.
  • Ogus, Anthony I. (1991), ‘Comment (on Staaf and Yandle, Collective and Private Choice; Constitutions, Statutes and the Common Law)’, in Weigel, Wolfgang (ed.), Economic Analysis of Law – A Collection of Applications , Vienna, …sterreichischer Wirtschaftsverlag, 267-269.
  • Parisi, Francesco (1991), ‘Interpretazione Giuridica ed Analisi Economica – Il Teorema di Coase Trenta Anni Dopo (Legal interpretation and economic analysis – The Coase theorem thirty years later)’, 9 Rivista critica del diritto privato , 401-434.
  • Parisi, Francesco (1995), ‘Private Property and Social Costs’, 2(2) European Journal of Law and Economics , 149-173. Posner, Richard A. and Parisi, Francesco (eds.), Law and Economics 597-622 (Elgar-Ashgate, 1997)
  • Pejovich, Svetozar (1995), Economic analysis of institutions and systems , International Studies in Economics and Econometrics, vol. 33. Dordrecht and Boston, Kluwer Academic, 231 p.
  • Peters, H. Elizabeth (1986), ‘Marriage and Divorce: Informational Constraints and Private Contracting’, 76 American Economic Review , 437-454.
  • Peters, H. Elizabeth (1992), ‘Marriage and Divorce: Reply’, 82 American Economic Review , 686-693.
  • Polinsky, A. Mitchell (1974), ‘Economic Analysis as a Potentially Defective Product: A Buyer’s Guide to Posner’s Economic Analysis of Law’, 87 Harvard Law Review , 1655-1681.
  • Polinsky, A. Mitchell (1979), ‘Controlling Externalities and Protecting Entitlements: Property Right, Liability Rule, and Tax-Subsidy Approaches’, 8 Journal of Legal Studies , 1-48.
  • Polinsky, A. Mitchell (1980), ‘Resolving Nuisance Disputes: The Simple Economics of Injunctive and Damage Remedies’, 33 Stanford Law Review , 1075-1112.
  • Posin, Daniel Q. (1990), ‘The Coase Theorem: If Pigs Could Fly’, 37 Wayne Law Review , 89-120.
  • Posin, Daniel Q. (1991), ‘Bringing Home the Bacon: A Response to Critics’, 38 Wayne Law Review , 107 ff.
  • Posin, Daniel Q. (1995), ‘Risk and the Error of the Coase Theorem’, 62 Tennessee Law Review , 1057-1071.
  • Posin, Daniel Q. (1996), ‘Silicone Breast Implant Litigation and My Father-in-Law: A Neo-Coasean Analysis’, 70 Tulane Law Review , 2565-2582.
  • Posin, Daniel Q. (797), ‘The Coase Theorem: Through a Glass Darkly’, 61 Tennessee Law Review , 868 ff.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1983), The Economics of Justice , Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1992), Economic Analysis of Law , 4th ed. , Boston, Little Brown.
  • Prudencio, Yves C. (1982), ‘The Voluntary Approach to Externality Problems: An Experimental Test’, 9 Journal Environmental Economy and Management , 213-228.
  • Quirk, James P. (1987), Intermediate microeconomics, Third edition , Chicago, Henley on Thames, Sydney and Toronto, Science Research Associates, 485 p.
  • Randall, Alan (1983), ‘The Problem of Market Failure’, 23 Natural Resources Journal , 131-148.
  • Randall, Allan (1972), ‘Market Solutions to Externality Problems: Theory and Practice’, 54 American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 175-183.
  • Randall, Allan (1974), ‘Coasian Externality Theory in a Policy Context’, 14 Natural Resources Journal , 35-54.
  • Regan, Donald H. (1972), ‘The Problem of Social Cost Revisited’, 15 Journal of Law and Economics , 427-437.
  • Roberts, John (1991), ‘Review of: Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy’, 32 Journal of Economic Literature , 159-161.
  • Ryssdal, Stray A.C. (1995), Legal Realism & Economics as Behavior – A Scandinavian Look at the Economic Analysis of Law , Oslo, Juridisk Forlag.
  • Ryssdal, Stray A.C. (1995), An Economic Analysis of Civil Suits and Appels , Oslo, Juridisk Forlag.
  • Samuels, Warren J. (1974), ‘The Coase Theorem and the Study of Law and Economics’, 14 Natural Resources Journal , 1-33.
  • Samuelson, Paul A. (1954), ‘The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure’, 36 Review of Economics and Statistics , 386-389.
  • Samuelson, Paul A. (1964), Economics: An Introductory Analysis, 6th ed. , New York, McGraw-Hill.
  • Samuelson, Paul A. (1966), ‘Modern Economic Realities and Individualism’, in Stiglitz, Joseph E. (ed.), The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson , Cambridge (MA), MIT Press, 1407-1418.
  • Samuelson, William (1985), ‘A Comment on the Coase Theorem’, in Roth, Alvin E. (ed.), Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 321-339.
  • Saraydar, Edward (1983), ‘Bargaining Power, Dissimulation, and the Coase Theorem’, 139 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 599-611.
  • Schap, David (1986), ‘The Nonequivalence of Property Rules and Liability Rules’, 6 International Review of Law and Economics , 125-132.
  • Schlag, Pierre (1986), ‘An Appreciative Comment on Coase’s the Problem of Social Cost: A View from the Left’, Wisconsin Law Review , 919-962.
  • Schlag, Pierre (1989), ‘The Problem of Transaction Costs’, 62 Southern California Law Review , 1661-1699.
  • Schulze, William D. and D’arge, Ralph C. (1974), ‘The Coase Proposition, Information Costs and Long-run Equilibrium’, 64 American Economic Review , 763-772.
  • Schulze, William D. and D’arge, Ralph C. (1977), ‘The Coase Proposition, Information Constraints, and Long-Run Equilibrium: Reply’, 67 American Economic Review , 462-463.
  • Schwab, Stewart J. (1987), ‘Collective Bargaining and the Coase Theorem’, 72 Cornell Law Review , 245-287.
  • Schwab, Stewart J. (1988), ‘A Coasean Experiment on Contract Presumptions’, 17 Journal of Legal Studies , 237-268.
  • Schwab, Stewart J. (1989), ‘Coase Defends Coase: Why Lawyers Listen and Economists Do Not’, 87 Michigan Law Review , 1171-1198.
  • Schwab, Stewart J. (1991), ‘Coase, Rents, and Opportunity Costs’, 38 Wayne State Law Review , 55-74.
  • Schwab, Stewart J. (1993), ‘Coase’s Twin Towers: The Relation Between The Nature of the Firm and The Problem of Social Cost’, 18 Journal of Corporation Law , 359-370.
  • Schweizer, Urs (1988), ‘Externalities and the Coase Theorem: Hypothesis or Result?’, 144 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 245-266.
  • Shapiro, David L. (1974), ‘Rent and the Coase Theorem’, 7(1) Journal of Economic Theory , 125-128.
  • Shapiro, David L. (1977), ‘A Note on Rent and the Coase Theorem: Editorial Addendum’, 14(1) Journal of Economic Theory , 221-222.
  • Shapiro, David L. (1978), ‘The Coase Theorem and Quasi Rents: Correcting the Record Reply’, 6(2) Public Finance Quarterly , 262-264.
  • Shapiro, David L. (1984), ‘A Note on Rent and the Coase Theorem’, 7 Journal of Economic Theory , 125-128.
  • Shea, Koon Lam (1978), ‘Coase Theorem, Liability Rules and Social Optimum’, 114(3) Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv , 540-550.
  • Shogren, Jason F. (1992), ‘An Experiment on Coasian Bargaining Over Ex Ante Lotteries and Ex Post Rewards’, 17S Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 153-169.
  • Shogren, Jason F. and Kask, Susan B. (1992), ‘Exploring the Boundaries of the Coase Theorem: Efficiency and Rationality Given Imperfect Contract Enforcement’, 39(2) Economics Letters , 155-161.
  • Shoup, Donald C. (1971), ‘Theoretical Efficiency in Pollution Control: Comment’, 9 Western Economic Journal , 310-313.
  • Silberberg, Eugene (1978), The Structure of Economics. A Mathematical Analysi , New York, McGraw-Hill.
  • Sinn, Hans-Werner and Schmoltzi, Ulrich (1981), ‘Eigentumsrechte, Kompensationsregeln und Marktmacht Anmerkungen zum “Coase Theorem” (With English summary) (Property Rights, Compensation Rules and Market Power Comments on the “Coase Theorem)’, 196(2) Jahrbuch fŸr Nationalškonomie und Statistik , 97-117.
  • Spitzer, Matthew L. and Hoffman, Elizabeth (1980), ‘A Reply to Consumption Theory, Production Theory and Ideology in the Coase Theorem’, 53 Southern California Law Review , 1187-1223.
  • Staaf, Robert J. and Yandle, Bruce (1991), ‘Collective and Private Choice: Constitutions, Statutes and the Common Law’, in Weigel, Wolfgang (ed.), Economic Analysis of Law – A Collection of Applications , Vienna, …sterreichischer Wirtschaftsverlag, 254-265.
  • Stake, Jeffrey E. (1995), ‘Loss Aversion and Involuntary Transfers of Title’, in Malloy, Robin P. and Braun, Christopher K. (eds.), Law and Economics: New and Critical Perspectives , New York, Peter Lang, 331-360.
  • Starrett, David A. (1972), ‘Fundamental Nonconvexities in the Theory of Externalities’, 4 Journal of Economic Theory , 180-199.
  • Stigler, George J. (1966), The Theory of Price, 3rd ed , New York, MacMillan.
  • Stigler, George J. (1989), ‘Two Notes on the Coase Theorem’, 99(3) Yale Law Journal , 631-633.
  • Sumner, Charles (1993), Red Deer Management Problems in Strathyre Forest: Ecology, Economics and Land Use , University of Stirling, Department of Environmental Science, M.Sc. dissertation.
  • Sumner, Charles (1993), Red Deer Management Problems in Strathyre Forest: Ecology, Economics and Land Use , University of Stirling, Department of Environmental Science, M.Sc. dissertation.
  • Sutton, John (1986), ‘Noncooperative Bargaining Theory: An Introduction’, 53 Review of Economic Studies , 709-724.
  • Swan, Peter L. (1975), ‘The Coase Theorem and ‘Sequential’ Pareto Optimality’, 51 Economic Record , 268-271.
  • Thaler, Richard H. (1980), ‘Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice’, 1 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 39-60.
  • Turvey, Ralph (1963), ‘On Divergences Between Social Cost and Private Cost’, 30 Economica , 309-313.
  • Tybout, Richard A. (1972), ‘Pricing Pollution and Other Negative Externalities’, 3 Bell Journal of Economics , 252-266.
  • Tybout, Richard A. (1973), ‘Pricing of Pollution: Reply the Coase Theorem in the Long Run: Reply’, 4 Bell Journal of Economics , 320-321.
  • Veljanovski, Cento G. (1977), ‘The Coase Theorem: The Say’s Law of Welfare Economics?’, 53 Economic Record , 535-541.
  • Veljanovski, Cento G. (1982), ‘The Coase Theorems and the Economic Theory of Markets and Law’, 35 Kyklos , 53-74.
  • Ventura, Andrea (1990), ‘Il ruolo del teorema di Coase nell’analisi economica del diritto di G. Calabresi (The role of the Coase theorem in G. Calabresi’s economic analysis of law)’, Economia Pubblica , 27-34.
  • Vogel, Kenneth R. (1987), ‘The Coase Theorem and California Animal Trespass Law’, 16 Journal of Legal Studies , 149-187.
  • Walsh, Cliff (1975), ‘First-Party-Priority Revisited’, 51 Economic Record , 275-277.
  • Wegehenkel, Lothar (1980), Coase Theorem und Marktsystem (Coase Theorem and the Market System) , TŸbingen, Mohr, 138 p.
  • Weimer, David L. and Vining, Aidan R. (1992), Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 2nd ed. , Englewood Cliffs (NJ), Prentice-Hall.
  • Weld, John (1973), ‘Coase, Social Cost and Stability: An Integrative Essay’, 13 Natural Resources Journal , 595-613.
  • Wellisz, Stanislaw (1964), ‘On External Diseconomies and the Governement – Assisted Invisible Hand’, 31 Economica , 345-362.
  • White, Barbara (1987), ‘Coase and the Courts: Economics for the Common Man.’, 72 Iowa Law Review , 577-635.
  • Willig, Robert D. (1976), ‘Consumer’s Surplus Without Apology’, 66 American Economic Review , 589-897.
  • Wohar, Mark E. (1988), ‘Alternative Versions of the Coase Theorem and the Definition of Transaction Costs’, 27(1) Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics , 3-19.
  • Woj, Carolyn (1985), ‘Property Rights Disputes: Current Fallacies and a New Approach’, 14 Journal of Legal Studies , 411-422.
  • Woodbury, Stephen A. and Spiegelman, Robert G. (1987), ‘Bonuses to Workers and Employers to Reduce Unemployment: Randomized Trials in Illinois’, 77 American Economic Review , 513-530.
  • X (1977), ‘A Note on Rent and the Coase Theorem by David Shapiro’, 14 Journal of Economic Theory , 221-222.
  • X (1980), ‘Symposium on Efficiency as a Legal Concern’, 8 Hofstra Law Review .
  • X (1980), ‘Symposium on Efficiency as a Legal Concern’, 8 Hofstra Law Review .
  • Zelder, Martin (1993), ‘The Economic Analysis of the Effect of No-Fault Divorce Law on the Divorce Rate’, 16 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy , 241-267.
  • Zelder, Martin (1993), ‘Inefficient Dissolutions as a Consequence of Public Goods: The Case of No-Fault Divorce’, 22 Journal of Legal Studies , 503-520.
  • Zelder, Martin (1997), ‘The Cost of Accosting: A Reconciliatory Survey of Proofs and Disproofs of the Coase Theorem’, in Medema, Steven G. (ed.), Coasean Economics , Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Zerbe, Richard O., Jr. (1976), ‘The Problem of Social Cost: Fifteen Years Later’, in Say, Lin, (ed.), Theory and Measurement of Economic Externalities , New York, Academia Press, 29-36.
  • Zerbe, Richard O., Jr. (1980), ‘The Problem of Social Cost in Retrospect’, 2 Research in Law and Economics , 83-102.
  • Zerbe, Richard O., Jr. (1996), Is Benefit Cost Analysis Legal , Working Paper, Graduate School of Public Affairs, University of Washington.
  • Zerbe, Richard O., Jr. and McCurdy, Howard (1996), The Failure of Market Failure , Working Paper, University of Washington.
  • Zerbe, Richard O., Jr. and Urban, Nicole (1988), ‘Including the Public Interest in Theories of Regulation’, 11 Research in Law and Economics , 1-23.
  • Zimbalist, Andrew (1994), ‘Review of: Pay dirt: The business of professional team sports’, 32 Journal of Economic Literature , 167-168.
  • Zupan, Mark A. (1990), ‘On Cream Skimming, Coase and the Sustainability of Natural Monopolies’, 22(4) Applied Economics , 487-492.
Copied to clipboard