Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Encyclopedia of Law & Economics – 0400 Methodology: General (incl. debate on scientific value)

  • Adams, Michael (1984), ‘Ist die …konomie eine imperialistische Wissenschaft? – †ber Nutz und Frommen der …konomischen Analyse des Rechts (Is Economics an Imperialist Science? On the Usefulness and Forms of Economic Analysis of Law)’, 7 JURA , 337-349.
  • Adelstein, Richard P. (1981), ‘Institutional Function and Evolution in the Criminal Process’, 76 Northwestern University Law Review , 1-99.
  • Adelstein, Richard P. (1981), ‘The Plea Bargain in England and America: A Comparative Institutional View’, in Burrows, Paul and Veljanovski, Cento G. (eds.), The Economic Approach to Law , London, Butterworths, 226-252.
  • Adelstein, Richard P. and Peretz, Steven I. (1985), ‘The Competition of Technologies in Markets for Ideas: Copyright and Fair Use in Evolutionary Perspective’, 5 International Review of Law and Economics , 209-238.
  • Alpa, Guido (1996), ‘Lo snobismo degli economisti e il rifiuto del dialogo con i giuristi ( a proposito dell’introduzione alla versione italiana di “Impresa, mercato e diritto” di R.H. Coase) (The economists’ snobbery and the refusal of dialogue with lawyers)’, Economia e diritto del terziario , 745-749.
  • Backhaus, JŸrgen G. (1996), Good Economics, Bad Economics, and European Economics , Meteor Research Memorandum, Maastricht, No. RM/96/007.
  • Brenner, Reuven (1980), ‘Economics: An Imperialistic Science?’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies , 184 ff.
  • Brietzke, Paul H. and Whitton, Linda S. (1996), ‘An Old(er) Master Stands on the Shoulders of Ageism to Stake Another Claim for Law and Economics (Book Review of Richard A. Posner, Aging and Old Age)’, 31 Valparaiso University Law Review , 89-109.
  • Bruce, Christopher J. (1989), ‘A Positive Analysis of Methodology in the Law and Economics Literature’, Hamline Law Review , 197-228.
  • Campbell, David (1994), ‘Ayres versus Coase: An Attempt to Recover the Issue of Equality in Law and Economics’, 21 British Journal of Law and Society , 434-463.
  • Campbell, David (1996), ‘On What is Valuable in Law and Economics’, 8 Otago Law Review , 489-514.
  • Campbell, David (1997), ‘The Relational Constitution of Contract and the Limits of Economics: Kenneth Arrow on the Social Background of Markets’, in Deakin, Simon and Michie, Jonathan (eds.), Contracts, Co-operation and Competition: Studies in Economics, Management and Law , Oxford, Oxford University Press, 529-596.
  • Chiassoni Pierluigi (1991), ‘L’analisi economica del diritto negli Stati Uniti: formalismo o realismo? (Economic analysis of law in the United States: formalism or realism ?)’, Quadrimestre , 473-525.
  • Chiassoni, Pierluigi (1991), ‘L’analisi economica del diritto negli Stati Uniti: formalismo o realismo? (Economic analysis of law in the United States: formalism or realism ?)’, Quadrimestre , 473-525.
  • Chiassoni, Pierluigi (1992), Economic Analysis of Law. L’analisi economica del diritto negli Stati Uniti (The economic analysis of law in the United States) , Torino, Giappichelli.
  • Chiassoni, Pierluigi (1992), Economic Analysis of Law. L’analisi economica del diritto negli Stati Uniti (The economic analysis of law in the United States) , Torino, Giappichelli.
  • Cosentino, Fabrizio (1988), ‘Autonomia privata e paternalismo del legislatore nella prospettiva dell’analisi economica del diritto (Individual Autonomy and the Paternalism of the Legislator: An EAL Perspective)’, Rivista critica del diritto privato , 473-511.
  • Cotter, Thomas F. (1996), ‘Legal Pragmatism and the Law and Economics Movement’, 84 Georgetown Law Journal , 2071-2141.
  • De Geest, Gerrit (1994), Economische analyse van het contracten- en quasi-contractenrecht: een onderzoek naar de wetenschappelijke waarde van de rechtseconomie (Economic Analysis of Contract Law and Quasi Contract Law: A Study on the Scientic Value of Law and Economics) , Antwerpen, Maklu, 568 p.
  • De Geest, Gerrit (1996), ‘The Debate on the Scientific Status on Law & Economics’, 40 European Economic Review , 999-1006.
  • Feichtinger, G., Forst, Ch.V. and Piccardi, C. (1993), ‘A Nonlinear Dynamic Model for the Dynastic Cycle,’, 165 Forschungsbericht/Research Memorandum .
  • Feichtinger, Gustav, ‘Crime and Punishment: A Dynamic Approach’, Forschungsbericht/Research Memorandum .
  • Ferrarese, Maria Rosaria (1992), Diritto e mercato: il caso degli Stati Uniti (Law and market: the case of the United States) , Torino, Giappichelli.
  • Ferrarese, Maria Rosaria (1992), Diritto e mercato: il caso degli Stati Uniti (Law and market: the case of the United States) , Torino, Giappichelli.
  • Frech, H. Edward III (1995), ‘European versus American Economics, Artificial Intellegence and Scientific Content’, 48 Kyklos , 219-226.
  • Gay, David E.R. (1981), ‘Book Review of Moral Revolution and Economic Science: The Demise of Laissez-Faire in Ninteenth Century British Political Economy, Ellen Frankel Paul’, 48 Southern Economic Journal , 530-531.
  • Gay, David E.R. (1982), ‘Book Review of The Role of Government in a Free Society, Phil Gramm’, 50 Southern Economic Journal , 916-917.
  • Gemtos, Petros A. (1988), ‘Methodologika Programmata sten Oikonomike kai te Nomike Episteme kai to Provlema tes Diepistemonikes tous Synergasias (Methodological Programs in Economics and Jurisprudence and the Problem of its Interdisciplinary Collaboration)’, 36 Nomiko Vema , 1192-1202. Reprinted in Cyprus Law Review, 39, 4627-4643 (1990).
  • Gemtos, Petros A. (1990), ‘Law and Economics: Methodological Problems in Their Interdisciplinary Cooperation’, in Nicolacopoulos, Pantelis D. (ed.), Greek Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 121) , Dordrecht, Kluwer, 239-250.
  • Gemtos, Petros A. (1995), Oikonomika kai Dikaio: Oikonomika gia Nomikous, tomos A_: Methodologika kai Oikonomika (Themelia Law and Economics: Economics for Lawyers, vol. I: Methodological and Economic Foundations) , Athens-Komotini, Ant. N. Sakkoulas Publications.
  • Gragnani, A., Feichtinger, G. and Rinaldi, S. (1994), ‘Dynamics of Drug Consumption: A Theoretical Model’, 94-77 Working Paper .
  • Gragnani, A., Rinaldi, S. and Feichtinger, G. (1995), ‘Slow-Fast Limit Cycles in Controlled Drug Markets’, 185 Forschungsbericht/Research Memorandum .
  • Grillo, Michele (1996), ‘Lo snobismo degli economisti e il rifiuto del dialogo con i giuristi. Una risposta a Guido Alpa (The economists’ snobbery and the refusal of dialogue with lawyers. A reply to Guido Alpa)’, Economia e diritto del terziario , 751-754.
  • Hol, A.M. (1991), ‘Rechten En Doeleinden. Enkele Morele Aspecten Van Juridische Aansprakelijkheid (Rights and Goals. Some Moral Aspects of Legal Liability)’, in X (ed.), Dilemma’s van Aansprakelijkheid , Zwolle, Tjeenk Willink, 127-142.
  • Huerta De Soto, Jesœs (1982), ‘MŽtodo y crisis en la ciencia econ—mica (Method and Crisis in Economics)’, 74 Hacienda Pœblica Espa–ola , 33-48.
  • Johnsen, D. Bruce (1986), ‘Wealth Is Value’, 15 Journal of Legal Studies , 263-288.
  • Katz, Avery (1996), ‘Taking Private Ordering Seriously’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review .
  • Katz, Avery (1996), ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Economics’, Michigan Law Review .
  • Kitch, Edmund W. (1983), ‘Intellectual Foundations of Law and Economics’, 33(2) Journal of Legal Education , 183-209.
  • Kitch, Edmund W. (1992), ‘The Framing Hypothesis’, in Newman, Peter, Milgate, Murray and Eatwell, John (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance , London, MacMillan.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1984), ‘The Great Image of Authority’, 36 Stanford Law Review , 349 ff.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1986), ‘Economic Analysis of Law’, 16 Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica , 233 ff.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1988), ‘Economique (Analyse- -du droit)’, in Arnaud, AndrŽ-Jean (ed.), Dictionnaire Encyclopedique de theorie et de sociologie du droit , Librairie General de Droit et de Jurisprudence.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1989), ‘The New Economic Analysis of Law: Legal Rules as Incentives’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Law and Economics , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1992), ‘Analise economica do direito’, 43(2) Sub Judica: justica e sociedade .
  • Lande, Robert H. (1989), ‘Commentary: Implications of Professor Scherer’s Research for the Future of Antitrust’, 29 Washburn Law Journal , 256 ff.
  • Leff, Arthur A. (1974), ‘Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism About Nominalism’, 60 Virginia Law Review , 78 ff.
  • Llebot Majo, JosŽ Oriol (1996), ‘Doctrina y teor’a de la empresa en el Derecho mercantil (Una aproximaci—n al significado de la teor’a contractual de la empresa) (Doctrine and Theory of the Firm in Contract Law Approaching the Meaning of Corporate Contractual Theory)’, 210 Revista de Derecho Mercantil , 319-388.
  • Mengoni, Luigi (1994), ‘L’argomentazione orientata alle conseguenze (The argument oriented to the consequences)’, Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile , 1-18.
  • Mercuro, Nicholas and Ryan, Timothy P. (1984), Law, Economics, and Public Policy , Greenwood, JAI Press.
  • MiguŽ, Jean-Luc (1977), ‘MŽthodologie Žconomique et Žconomie non marchande (Economic Methodology and Non-Trading Economics)’, Revue d’Žconomique politique , 506 ff.
  • Monateri, Pier Giuseppe (1995), ‘Risultati e regole. (Un’analisi giuridica dell’analisi economica del diritto) (Rules and outcomes. A legal analysis of the economic analysis of law)’, Rivista critica del diritto privato , 605-619.
  • Pastor, Santos (1984), ‘Una introducci—n al an‡lisis econ—mico del derecho (An Introduction to Law and Economics)’, 89 Hacienda Pœblica Espa–ola .
  • Pastor, Santos (1989), ‘Derechos de propiedad y an‡lisis econ—mico: Ànuevas luces a viejas sombras? (Economics of Property Rights: Shading Lights?)’, 38 Economistas , 28-35.
  • Reumer, AndrŽs (1996), An‡lisis Econ—mico del Derecho (Economic Analysis of Law) , Mexico, Fondo de Cultura Econ—mica, Sociedad Mexicana de geograf’a y Estad’stica, e Instituto Technol—gico Aut—nome de MŽxico.
  • Rinaldi, S., Feichtinger, G. and Wirl, F. (1994), ‘Corruption Dynamics in Democratic Systems’, 168 Forschungsbericht/Research Memorandum .
  • Roemer, Andrs (1992), Importancia del An‡lisis Econ—mico del Derecho , Mexico, SUMMA de la Sociedad Mexicana de Geograf’a en MŽxico y Estad’stica.
  • Romani, Franco (1990), ‘Diritto ed economia: la prospettiva di un economista (Law and Economics: the perspective of an economist)’, Sociologia del diritto , 245-254.
  • Romani, Franco (1990), ‘Diritto ed economia: la prospettiva di un economista (Law and Economics: the perspective of an economist)’, Sociologia del diritto , 245 ff.
  • Rowley, Charles K. (1981), ‘Social Sciences and the Law: The Relevance of Economic Theories’, 1 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies , 391-405.
  • Sousa Franco, At—nio (1992), ‘An‡lise Econ—mica do Direito: Exerc’cio Intelectual ou Fonte de Ensinamento?’, 2 Sub Judice , 63-70.
  • Stake, Jeffrey E. (1991), ‘Status and Incentive Aspects of Judicial Decisions’, 79 Georgetown Law Journal , 1447-1497.
  • Stout, Lynn A. (1997), ‘Irrational Expectations’, (forthc.) Journal of Legal Theory .
  • Trebilcock, Michael J. (1983), ‘The Prospects of “Law and Economics”: A Canadian Perspective’, 33 Journal of Legal Education , 288-290.
  • Turnbull, Shann (1977), Impact of Mining Royalties on Aboriginal Communities in the Northern Territory , First Report, Parliamentary Paper, Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, No. 135/1978, Oct..
  • Turnbull, Shann (1978), Economic Development of Aboriginal Communities in the Northern Territory Second Report, Self-sufficiency (with Land Rights) , Parliamentary Paper, Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, No. 438/1978.
  • Turnbull, Shann (1980), Economic Development of Aboriginal Communities in the Northern Territory: A Study in two parts, Department of Aboriginal Affairs , Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service.
  • Turnbull, Shann (1992), ‘Economics and The Laws of Nature’, in Marston, Alan (ed.), The Other Economy: Economics Nature Can Live With , LBD Publishers, Auckland, 81-138.
  • Turnbull, Shann (1994), ‘Stakeholder Democracy: redesigning the Governance of Firms and Bureaucracies’, 23(3) Journal of Socio-Economics , 321-360.
  • Turnbull, Shann (1997), ‘Stakeholder Governance: A cybernetic and property rights analysis’, 5(1) Corporate Governance: An International Review , 11-23.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1991), ‘Intellectual Foundations: The Need for a Broader View’, 33 Journal of Legal Education , 210-216.
Copied to clipboard