Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Encyclopedia of Law & Economics – 0200 History of Law & Economics

  • Ackerman, Bruce A. (1985), ‘Foreword: Talking and Trading’, 85 Columbia Law Review , 899-904.
  • Ackerman, Bruce A. (1986), ‘Deux sortes de recherche “en droit et Žconomie” (Two Sorts of Research in Law & Economics)’, Revue de la Recherche Juridique .
  • Ackerman, Bruce A. (1986), ‘Deux sortes de recherche “en droit et Žconomie” (Two Sorts of Research in Law & Economics)’, Revue de la Recherche Juridique .
  • Adams, Michael (1984), ‘Ist die …konomie eine imperialistische Wissenschaft? – †ber Nutz und Frommen der …konomischen Analyse des Rechts (Is Economics an Imperialist Science? On the Usefulness and Forms of Economic Analysis of Law)’, 7 JURA , 337-349.
  • Adelstein, Richard P. (1989), ‘Islands of Conscious Power: Louis D. Brandeis and the Modern Corporation’, 63 Business History Review , 614-656.
  • Allott, Anthony N. (1989), ‘Attempting the Impossible: A Plea for Legal Economy’, Denning Law Journal , 1-13.
  • Areeda, Phillip (1988), ‘Comment: Always a Borrower: Law and Other Disciplines’, Duke Law Journal , 1029-1043.
  • Arup, Christopher (1982), ‘Accounting for the Social Costs of Technology Through the Legal Process’, in Cranston, Ross and Schick, Anne (eds.), Law and Economics , Canberra, Australian National University, 25-38.
  • Assmann, Heinz-Dieter (1989), ‘Kommentar on Ott, Allokationseffizienz, Rechtsdogmatik und Rechtsprechung’, in Ott, Claus and SchŠfer, Hans-Bernd (eds.), Allekationseffizienz in der Rechtsordnung , Berlin, Springer, 45-49.
  • Backhaus, JŸrgen G. (1978), ‘Lawyers’ Economics vs. the Economic Analysis of Law: A Critique of Professor Posner’s “Economic Approach to Law with Reference to a Case Concerning Damages for Loss of Earning Capacity”‘, 3 Munich Social Science Review , 57-80.
  • Backhaus, JŸrgen G. (1990), ‘De eis tot correctie van ondoelmatig recht (The Need to Correct Inefficient Law)’, 39(10) Ars Aequi , 660-665.
  • Backhaus, JŸrgen G. (1997), ‘Christian Wolff on Subsidiarity, the Division of Labor, and Social Welfare’, 4 (2-3) European Journal of Law and Economics , 129-146.
  • Baker, C. Edwin (1978), ‘Posner’s Privacy Mystery and the Failure of Economic Analysis of Law’, 12 Georgia Law Review .
  • Baker, Tom (1996), ‘On the Genealogy of Moral Hazard’, 75 Texas Law Review , 237-292.
  • Barney, J.B. and Ouchi, William G. (1986), ‘Introduction: The Search for New Microeconomic and Organization Theory Paradigms’, in Barney, J.B. and Ouchi, W.G. (eds.), Organizational Economics , San Francisco, 1-17.
  • Bauer, P.T. and Walters, A.A. (1975), ‘The State of Economics’, 18 Journal of Law and Economics , 1-23.
  • Behrens, Peter (1981), ‘Aspekte einer škonomischen Theorie des Rechts (Aspects of an Economic Theory of Law)’, 12 Rechtstheorie , 472-490.
  • Black, Robert A., Kreide, Rosalie S. and Sullivan, Mark (1988), ‘Critical Legal Studies, Economic Realism, and the Theory of the Firm’, 43 University of Miami Law Review , 343-360.
  • Bowler, Clara Ann (1974), ‘The Papers of Henry C. Simons’, 17 Journal of Law and Economics , 7-11.
  • Braucher, Jean (1988), ‘Toward a Broader Perspective on the Role of Economics in Legal Policy Analysis: A Retrospective and an Agenda from Albert O. Hirschman’, Law and Social Inquiry , 741-771.
  • Brems, Hans (1975), ‘Marshall on Mathematics’, 18 Journal of Law and Economics , 583-585.
  • Brennan, Geoffrey and Buchanan, James M. (1981), ‘The Normative Purpose of Economic ‘Science’: Rediscovery of an Eighteenth Century Method’, 1 International Review of Law and Economics , 155-166.
  • Brenner, Reuven (1980), ‘Economics – An Imperialist Science ?’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies , 179-188.
  • Breyer, Stephen G. (1987), ‘Economics and Judging: An Afterword on Cooter and Wald’, 50(4) Law and Contemporary Problems , 245-252.
  • Bruce, Christopher J. (1989), ‘A Positive Analysis of Methodology in the Law and Economics Literature’, Hamline Law Review , 197-228.
  • Buchanan, James M. (1959), ‘Positive Economics, Welfare Economics, and Political Economy’, 2 Journal of Law and Economics , 124-138.
  • Buchanan, James M. (1964), ‘Is Economics the Science of Choice?’, in Streissler, E. (ed.), Roads to Freedom. Essays in honour of F. A. Hayek , London, Kegan Paul.
  • Buchanan, James M. (1974), ‘Good Economics, Bad Law’, 60 Virginia Law Review , 483-492.
  • Buchanan, James M. (1979), What Should Economists Do? , Indianapolis, Liberty Press, 292 p.
  • Burrows, Paul and Veljanovski, Cento G. (1981), ‘Introduction: The Economic Approach to Law’, in Burrows, Paul and Veljanovski, Cento G. (eds.), The Economic Approach to Law , London, Butterworths, 1-34.
  • Bydlinski, Franz (1988), Fundamentale Rechts grundsŠtze (Fundamental Principles of Law) , New York, Springer Publishers.
  • Cabrillo, Francisco (1986), ‘Adam Smith on Bankruptcy Law? New Law and Economics in the Glasgow Lectures?’, 8(1) History of Economics Society Bulletin , 40-41.
  • Calabresi, Guido (1978), ‘On the General State of Law and Economics Research Today and Its Current Problems and Prospects’, in Skogh, Gšran (ed.), Law and Economics. Report from a Symposium in Lund , Lund, Juridiska Fšreningen, 9-16.
  • Calabresi, Guido (1981), The New Economic Analysis of Law: Scholarship, Sophistry or Self-Indulgence , London, British Academy.
  • Campbell, David (1994), ‘Ayres versus Coase: An Attempt to Recover the Issue of Equality in Law and Economics’, 21 British Journal of Law and Society , 434-463.
  • Carstensen, Peter C. (1986), ‘Prophets of Regulation: Charles Francis Adams, Louis D. Brandeis, James M. Landis, Alfred F. Kahn’, 6 American Bar Foundation Research Journal , 881-902.
  • Chubb, Larry L. (1989), ‘Economic Analysis in the Courts: Limits and Constraints’, 64 Indiana Law Journal , 769-801.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1972), ‘The Appointment of Pigou as Marshall’s Successor’, 15 Journal of Law and Economics , 473-485.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1978), ‘Economics and Contiguous Disciplines’, 7 Journal of Legal Studies , 201-211.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1982), How Should Economists Choose? The Warren G. Nutter , Washington, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
  • Coase, Ronald H. (1993), ‘Introduction: Take Stock’, 36 Journal of Law and Economics , 239-254.
  • Coats, A.W. (1972), ‘The Appointment of Pigou as Marshall’s Successor: Comment’, 15 Journal of Law and Economics , 487-495.
  • Cohen, George M. (1985), ‘Posnerian Jurisprudence and Economic Analysis of Law: The View from the Bench’, 133 University of Pennsylvania Law Review , 1117-1166.
  • Coleman, James S. (1984), ‘Introducing Social Structure into Economic Analysis’, 74 American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings , 84-88.
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1980), ‘Efficiency, Exchange and Auction: Philosophic Aspects of the Economic Approach to Law’, 68 California Law Review , 221-249.
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1982), ‘The Economic Analysis of Law’, in Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W. (eds.), Nomos XXIV: Ethics, Economics and the Law , New York, New York University Press, 83-103.
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1984), ‘Economics and the Law: A Critical Review of the Foundations of the Economic Approach to Law’, 94 Ethics , 649-679.
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1988), Markets, Morals and the Law , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 393 p.
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1989), ‘Afterword: The Rational Choice Approach to Legal Rules’, 65 Chicago-Kent Law Review , 177-191.
  • Commons, John R. (1925), ‘Law and Economics’, 34 Yale Law Journal , 371-382.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1982), ‘Law and the Imperialism of Economics: An Introduction to the Economic Analysis of Law by Reviewing Some Major Books’, 29 UCLA Law Review , 1260-1269.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1989), ‘The Best Right Laws: Value Foundations of the Economic Analysis of Law’, 64 Notre Dame Law Review , 817-837. Reprinted in Levit, Nancy and Hayman, Robert (Eds.), Jurisprudence: Contemporary Readings, Problems, and Narratives, West, 1994.
  • Cooter, Robert D. and Gordley, James (1991), ‘Economic Analysis in Civil Law Countries: Past, Present, Future-Introduction to a Symposium’, 11 International Review of Law and Economics , 261-263.
  • Cordato, Roy E. (1989), ‘Subjective Value, Time Passage, and the Economics of Harmful Effects’, 12 Hamline Law Review , 229-244.
  • Cranston, Ross (1977), ‘Creeping Economism: Some Thoughts on Law and Economics’, 4 British Journal of Law and Society , 103-115.
  • Cranston, Ross (1982), ‘Comment’, in Cranston, Ross and Schick, Anne (eds.), Law and Economics , Canberra, Australian National University, 39-41.
  • Daintith, Terence C. and Teubner, Gunther (1986), ‘Sociological Jurisprudence and Legal Economics: Risks and Rewards’, in Daintith, Terence and Teubner, Gunther (eds.), Contract and Organisation: Legal Analysis in the Light of Economic and Social Theory , Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 3-22.
  • Daynard, Richard A. (1971), ‘Use of Social Policy in Judicial Decision-Making’, 56 Cornell Law Review , 919-950.
  • De Alessi, Louis (1987), ‘Nature and Methodological Foundations of Some Recent Extensions of Economic Theory’, in Radnitzky, Gerard and Bernholz, Peter (eds.), Economic Imperialism: The Economic Approach Applied Outside the Field of Economics , New York, Paragon House, 51-76.
  • De Alessi, Louis (1990), ‘Form, Substance, and Welfare Comparisons in the Analysis of Institutions’, 146 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 5-23.
  • De Alessi, Louis and Staaf, Robert J. (1989), ‘Property Rights and Choice’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Law and Economics , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 175-200.
  • De Geest, Gerrit (1987), ‘James Buchanan, Nobelprijswinnaar economie 1986 (James Buchanan, Nobel Laureate Economics 1986)’, De Vlaamse Gids , 44-49.
  • De Geest, Gerrit (1990), ‘Public Choice, mensbeeld en ideologie (Public Choice, Model of Man and Ideology)’, 19 Rechtsfilosofie en Rechtstheorie , 109-122.
  • De Geest, Gerrit (1990), ‘Public Choice en rechtseconomie (Public Choice and Law & Economics)’, 39 Ars Aequi , 666-673.
  • Debow, Michael E. and Lee, D.R. (1988), ‘Understanding (and Misunderstanding) Public Choice: A Response to Farber and Frickey’, 66 Texas Law Review , 993-1012.
  • Demsetz, Harold (1988), Ownership, Control, and the Firm. The Organization , Oxford, Blackwell, 300 p.
  • Diamond, Peter A. (1974), ‘Posner’s Economic Analysis of Law’, 5 Bell Journal of Economics , 294-300.
  • Dionne, Georges and Gagne, Robert (1988), ‘Models and Methodologies in the Analysis of Regulation Effects in Airline Markets’, 15 International Journal of Transport Economics , 291-312.
  • Donohue, John J. III (1988), ‘Law and Economics: The Road not Taken’, 22 Law and Society Review , 903-926.
  • Dreschler, Wolfgang (1997), ‘Christian Wolff (1679-1754) : A Biographical Essay’, 4 (2-3) European Journal of Law and Economics , 111-128.
  • Duggan, Tony (1989), ‘New Directions in Legal Theory: Law and Economics’, 63 Law Institute Journal , 852-853.
  • Durden, Garey C. (1991), ‘Determining the Classics in Social Choice’, 69 Public Choice , 265-277.
  • Durden, Garey C. and Marlin, James (1990), ‘An Analysis of Contributions and Contributors to Public Choice and the Journal of Law and Economics and 1973-1987’, 65 Public Choice , 101-141.
  • Easterbrook, Frank H. (1985), ‘Afterword: Knowledge and Answers’, 85 Columbia Law Review , 1117-1119.
  • Easterbrook, Frank H. (1985), ‘Method, Result and Authority: A Reply’, 98 Harvard Law Review , 622-629.
  • Easterbrook, Frank H. (1986), ‘Workable Antitrust Policy’, 84 Michigan Law Review , 1696 ff.
  • Ellickson, Robert C. (1989), ‘Bringing Culture and Human Frailty to Rational Actors: A Critique of Classical Law and Economics’, 65 Chicago-Kent Law Review , 23-55.
  • Englard, Izhak (1990), ‘Victor Mataja’s Liability for Damages from an Economic Viewpoint: A Centennial to an Ignored Economic Analysis of Tort’, 10 International Review of Law and Economics , 173-191.
  • Englard, Izhak (1991), ‘Law and Economics in American Tort Cases: A Critical Assessment of the Theory’s Impact on Courts’, 41 University of Toronto Law Journal , 359-430.
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1983), ‘Professor, Now Judge – A Tribute to Richard A. Posner’, 12 Journal of Legal Studies , 1-2.
  • Faith, Roger L., McCormick, Robert E. and Tollison, Robert D. (1981), ‘Economics and Metrology: Give ‘Em an Inch and They’ll Take a Kilometre’, 1 International Review of Law and Economics , 207-221.
  • Farber, Daniel A. (1986), ‘From Plastic Trees to Arrow’s Theorem’, 19 University of Illinois Law Review , 337 ff. Reprinted in Cardozo Law Review, 1987, 643-683.
  • Farber, Daniel A. and Frickey, Philip P. (1987), ‘The Jurisprudence of Public Choice’, 65 Texas Law Review , 873-927.
  • Fezer, Karl-Heinz (1986), ‘Aspekte einer Rechtskritik an der economic analysis of law und am property rights approach (Aspects of a Legal Critique on Law & Economics and)’, Juristenzeitung , 817-824.
  • Fezer, Karl-Heinz (1988), ‘Nochmals: Kritik an der škonomischen Analyse des Rechts (Once More: Critique on the Economic Analysis of La)’, Juristenzeitung , 223-228.
  • Fisher, Franklin M. (1980), ‘Multiple Regression in Legal Proceedings’, 80 Columbia Law Review , 702-736.
  • Fiss, Owen M. (1989), ‘The Law Regained’, 74 Cornell Law Review , 245-255.
  • Fox, Eleanor M. (1986), ‘Consumer Beware Chicago’, 84 Michigan Law Review , 1714-1720.
  • Frank, JŸrgen (1986), ‘Die “RationalitŠt” einer škonomischen Analyse des Rechts (The “Rationality” of an Economic Analysis of Law)’, 2 Zeitschrift fŸr Rechtssoziologie , 191-211.
  • Gallhorn, Ernest A. (1987), ‘The Practical Uses of Economic Analysis: Hope vs. Reality’, 56 Antitrust Law Journal , 933-945.
  • Gates, Henry Louis (1990), ‘Statistical Stigmata (Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice)’, 11 Cardozo Law Review , 1275-1289.
  • Gay, David E.R. (1979), ‘Economic Legalism: A Survey of the Naissance of the New Law and Economics’, 3 Midsouth Journal of Economics , 65-70.
  • Gay, David E.R. (1982), ‘Book Review of Theories of Property: From Aristotle to the Present, Anthony Parel and Thomas Flanagan’, 15 History of Political Economy , 281-283.
  • Gay, David E.R. (1983), ‘A Note on Professor Simons and Early Law and Economics’, 11 Atlantic Economic Journal , 77 ff.
  • Gay, David E.R. (1990), ‘A Note on the Deprivatization of the Grand Canyon’, 6 Forum of the Association for Arid Lands Studies , 41-43.
  • Gellhorn, Ernest A. (1987), ‘The Practical Uses of Economic Analysis: Hope vs. Reality’, 56 Antitrust Law Journal , 933-945.
  • Goetz, Charles J. (1989), ‘The Courtship of Law and Economics’, 12 Hamline Law Review , 245-259.
  • Goldring, John (1990), ‘Consumer Law and Legal Theory: Reflections of a Common Lawyer’, 13 Journal of Consumer Policy , 113-132.
  • Gray, John H. (1987), ‘The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour: The Prospects and Limitations’, in Radnitzky, Gerard and Bernholz, Peter (eds.), Economic Imperialism: The Economic Approach Applied Outside the Field of Economics , New York, Paragon House, 33-49.
  • Grbich, Yuri (1980), ‘Is Economics of Any Use to Tax Lawyers? Towards a more Substantial Jurisprudence to Replace Lega lism’, 12 Melbourne University Law Review , 340-355.
  • Guest, Stephen F.D. (1984), ‘The Economics of Law’, Current Legal Problems , 233-245.
  • Hamlin, Alan P. (1989), ‘Rights, Indirect Utilitarianism, and Contractarianism,’, 5 Economics and Philosophy , 167-189.
  • Hansmann, Henry B. (1983), ‘The Current State of Law-and- Economics Scholarship’, 33 Journal of Legal Education , 217-236.
  • Harris, Donald and Veljanovski, Cento G. (1984), ‘The Use of Economics to Elucidate Legal Concepts: The Law of Contract’, in Daintith, Terence and Teubner, Gunther (eds.), Law and the Social Sciences , Florence, European University Institute.
  • Harrison, Jeffrey L. (1986), ‘Egoism, Altruism, and Market Illusions: the Limits of Law and Economics’, 33 UCLA Law Review , 1309-1363.
  • Heald, Paul J. (1988), ‘A Lost Episode of “Meeting of the Minds”: Posner, Kelman, Holmes, and Pascal’, 6 Journal of Law and Religion , 279-295.
  • Henning, J.A. and Mann, H.M. (1981), ‘An Appraisal of Model Building in Industrial Organization’, 3 Research in Law and Economics , 1-14.
  • Hertig, Gerard (1991), ‘Law and Economics in Civil Law Countries: Switzerland’, 11 International Review of Law and Economics , 293-300.
  • Hertig, Gerard (1991), ‘The European Community’, 11 International Review of Law and Economics , 331-342.
  • Hess, James D. (1990), ‘A Comparison of Alternative Approaches to Economic Organization: Comment’, 146 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 72-75.
  • Hessel, B. (1990), ‘De mogelijke rol van de rechtseconomie in een moderne rechtsstaat (The Possible Role of Law-and- Economics in a State with a Rule of Law)’, 39(10) Ars Aequi , 645-653.
  • Heyne, Paul (1988), ‘The Foundations of Law and of Economics: Can the Blind Lead the Blind?’, 11 Research in Law and Economics , 53-71.
  • Hoffman, Elizabeth and Spitzer, Matthew L. (1985), ‘Experimental Law and Economics: An Introduction’, 85 Columbia Law Review , 991-1036.
  • Hollander, Samuel (1977), ‘Adam Smith and the Self-Interest Axiom’, 20 Journal of Law and Economics , 133-152.
  • Horn, Norbert (1976), ‘Zur škonomischen RationalitŠt des Privatrechts. Die privatrechts theoretische Verwertbarkeit der “Economics Analysis of Law” (On the Economic Rationality of Private Law. On the)’, 176 Archiv fŸr die civilistische Praxis , 307-333.
  • Horwitz, Morton J. (1980), ‘Law and Economics: Science or Politics?’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 905-912.
  • Hotz, Beat (1982), ‘…konomische Analyse des Rechts – eine skeptische Betrachtung (Economic Analysis of Law – A Sceptical Reflection)’, 34 Wirtschaft und Recht , 293-314.
  • Hovenkamp, Herbert J. (1986), ‘Rhetoric and Skepticism in Antitrust Argument’, 84 Michigan Law Review , 1721-1729.
  • Hovenkamp, Herbert J. (1988), ‘Derek Bok and the Merger of Law and Economics’, 21 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform , 515-539.
  • Hovenkamp, Herbert J. (1990), ‘Positivism in Law and Economics’, 78 California Law Review , 815-851.
  • Hovenkamp, Herbert J. (1990), ‘The First Great Law & Economics Movement’, 47 Stanford Law Review , 993-1058.
  • Hutter, Michael (1980), ‘†ber eine Alternative zur neoklassischen škonomischen Analyse des Rechts (On An Alternative for Neo-classical Economic Analy)’, 144 Zeitschrift fŸr das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht , 642-651.
  • Hutter, Michael (1982), ‘Early Contributions to Law and Economics – Adolf Wagner’s Grundlegung’, 16 Journal of Economic Issues , 131-147.
  • Jackson, Nick (1984), ‘The Economic Explanation of Legal Phenomena’, 4 International Review of Law and Economics , 163-183.
  • Johnson, Conrad D. (1983), ‘The Idea of Autonomy and the Foundations of Contractual Liability’, 2 Law and Philosophy , 271-303.
  • Jones, Trevor W. (1978), ‘The Appointment of Pigou as Marshall’s Successor: The Other Side of the Coin’, 21 Journal of Law and Economics , 235-243.
  • Kahn, Alfred E. (1988), ‘I Would Do It Again’, 12(2) Regulation , 22-28.
  • Kan, Steven S. and Hwang, Chun-Sin (1991), ‘Hsun-Tzu’s Theory of Justice (in Chinese)’, in Tai, Hua T. and Cheng, Hsiao-Shih, Justice and Related Concepts , Taipei, Academia Sinica, Sun Yat-sen Institute for Social Sciences and Philosophy, 93-130.
  • Kan, Steven S. and Hwang, Chun-Sin (1995), ‘The Break and the Link between Confucius and Mo-Tzu’s Public Norms (in Chinese)’, in Chien, Sechin Y.S. and Tai, Terence H. (eds.), Philosophy and Public Norms , Taipei, Academia Sinica, Sun Yat-sen Institute for Social Sciences and Philosophy, 135-162.
  • Kanamori, Schigenari (1997), ‘Christian Wolff’s Speech on Confucianism-Confucious as Compared with Wolff’, 4 (2-3) European Journal of Law and Economics , 299-304.
  • Kelman, Mark G. (1983), ‘Misunderstanding Social Life: A Critique of the Core Premises of “Law and Economics”‘, 33 Journal of Legal Education , 274-284.
  • Kelman, Mark G. (1984), ‘Trashing’, 36 Stanford Law Review , 293-348.
  • Kelman, Mark G. (1988), ‘On Democracy-Bashing: A Skeptical Look at the Theoretical and ‘Empirical’ Practice of the Public Choice Movement’, 74 Virginia Law Review , 199-273.
  • Kirchner, Christian (1991), ‘The Difficult Reception of Law and Economics in Germany’, 11 International Review of Law and Economics , 277-292.
  • Kitch, Edmund W. (1983), ‘The Intellectual Foundations of “Law and Economics”‘, 33 Journal of Legal Education , 184-196.
  • Kitch, Edmund W. (ed.) (1983), ‘The Fire of Truth: A Remembrance of Law and Economics at Chicago, 1932-1970’, 26 Journal of Law and Economics , 163-233.
  • Kleinewefers, Henner (1987), ‘…konomische Theorie des Rechts, †ber Unterschiede zwischen dem škonomischen und dem juristischen Denken (Economic Theory of Law, On the Differences between)’, in X (ed.), Staat und Gesellschaft, Festschrift fŸr Leo SchŸrm , Fribourg, UniversitŠtsverlag, 83-116.
  • Klevorick, Alvin K. (1975), ‘Law and Economic Theory : An Economist’s View’, 65 American Economic Review , 237-243.
  • Klevorick, Alvin K. (1985), ‘Legal Theory and the Economic Analysis of Torts and Crimes’, 85 Columbia Law Review , 905-920.
  • Koch, Harald (1981), ‘Die …konomie der Gestaltungsrechte. Mšglichkeiten und Grenzen der škonomische Analyse des Rechts am Beispiel von KŸndiging und Anfechtung (The Economics of Dispositive Right. Possibilities)’, in Bernstein, H., Drobnig, U. and Kštz, H. (eds.), Festschrift fŸr Konrad Zweigert zum 70. Geburtstag , TŸbingen, Mohr, 851-877.
  • Komesar, Neil K. (1981), ‘In Search of a General Approach to Legal Analysis: A Comparative Institutional Alternative’, 79 Michigan Law Review , 1350-1390.
  • Krause, GŸnter (1997), ‘Christian Wolff and the classics of “scientific socialism”‘, 4 (2-3) European Journal of Law and Economics , 285-297.
  • Kruithof, Robert (198), ‘Leven en dood van het contract (Life and Death of Contract)’, 49 Rechtskundig Weekblad , 2761-2768.
  • Kruithof, Robert (198), ‘Naschrift (Afterword)’, 50 Rechtskundig Weekblad , 1669-1680.
  • KŸbler, Friedrich (1989), ‘Schlu§wort: Vergleichende †berlegungen zur rechtspraktischen Bedeutung der škonomischen Analyse (Closing Word: Comparitive Considerations on the Meaning of Law & Economics for Legal Practice)’, in Ott, Claus and SchŠfer, Hans-Bernd (eds.), Allekationseffizienz in der Rechtsordnung , Berlin, Springer, 293-306.
  • Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • Lachman, Judith A. (1984), ‘Knowing and Showing Economics and Law – Book Review: Mitchell Polinsky: An Introduction to Law & Economics’, 93 Yale Law Journal , 1587-1624.
  • Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A. (1993), ‘The Influence of Economics of Law: A Quantitative Study’, 36 Journal of Law and Economics , 385-424.
  • Landes, William M., Carlton, Dennis W. and Easterbrook, Frank H. (1983), ‘On the Resignation of Ronald H. Coase’, 26 Journal of Law and Economics , 2-8.
  • Latin, Howard (1987), ‘Activity Levels, Due Care, and Selective Realism in Economic Analysis of Tort Law’, 39 Rutgers Law Review , 487-514. Reprinted in Personal Injury Review Ann., 1988, 956-990.
  • Leff, Arthur A. (1974), ‘Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism about Nominalism’, 60 Virginia Law Review , 451-482.
  • Lempert, Richard (1985), ‘Statistics in the Courtroom: Building on Rubinfeld’, 85 Columbia Law Review , 1098-1116.
  • Levi, Edward H. (1966), ‘Aaron Director and the Study of Law and Economics’, 9 Journal of Law and Economics , 3-4.
  • Liebeler, Wesley J. (1987), ‘What Are the Alternatives to Chicago?’, Duke Law Journal , 879-898.
  • Liebhafsky, Harold H. (1976), ‘Price Theory as Jurisprudence: Law and Economics Chicago Style’, 10 Journal of Economic Issues , 23-43. Reprinted in Samuels, Warren J. (ed.).
  • Liebhafsky, Harold H. (1987), ‘Law and Economics from Different Perspectives’, 21 Journal of Economic Issues , 1809-1836.
  • Livingston, Marie Leigh (1987), ‘Evaluating the Performance of Environmental Policy: Contributions of Neoclassical, Public Choice, and Institutional Models’, 21 Journal of Economic Issues , 281-294.
  • MacKaay, Ejan (1986), ‘La rgle juridique observŽe par le prisme de l Žconomiste – une histoire stylisŽe du mouvement d analyse Žconomique du droit (Law Observed through an Economist’s Eyeglass – A Stylised History of the Law and Economics Movement)’, 1 Revue internationale de Droit Economique , 43-88.
  • MacKaay, Ejan (1986), ‘La rgle juridique observŽe par le prisme de l’Žconomiste – une histoire stylisŽe du mouvement d’analyse Žconomique du droit (The Legal Rule Viewed from the Perspective of the Economist – A Stylized History of the Law and Economics Movement)’, 1 Revue internationale de Droit Economique , 43-88.
  • MacKaay, Ejan (1987), ‘Courants de pensŽe juridique ˆ l’origine de l’analyse Žconomique du droit (tableaux) (Legal Currents at the Origin of the Economic Analysis of Law (Tables))’, 1987 Revue de la Recherche Juridique Droit Perspectif , 635-636.
  • MacKaay, Ejan (1987), ‘Tableau synoptique de l’analyse Žconomique du droit (Synoptic Table of the Economic Analysis of Law)’, 1987 Revue de la Recherche Juridique Droit Perspectif , 637 ff.
  • MacKaay, Ejan (1988), ‘Het recht bezien door de bril van de economist – Een gestyleerd overzicht van de rechtseconomie (Law Seen Through Economist s Glasses: An Overview)’, Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn Themis , 411-452.
  • MacKaay, Ejan (1991), ‘Verschuivingen in De Rechtseconomie (Shifts in Law-and-Economics)’, 66 Nederlands Juristenblad , 1505-1521.
  • Makgetla, Neva Seidman and Seidman, Robert B. (1989), ‘The Applicability of Law and Economics to Policymaking in the Third World’, 23 Journal of Economic Issues , 35-78.
  • Malloy, Robin Paul (1990), ‘The Limits of Science in Legal Discourse – A Reply to Posner’, 24 Valparaiso University Law Review , 175-181.
  • Manne, Henry G. (1987), ‘Intellectual Styles and the Evolution of American Corporation Law’, in Radnitzky, Gerard and Bernholz, Peter (eds.), Economic Imperialism: The Economic Approach Applied Outside the Field of Economics , New York, Paragon House, 219-241.
  • Markovits, Richard S. (1975), ‘A Basic Structure for Microeconomic Policy Analysis in our Worse-Than-Second-Best World: A Proposal and Related Critique of the Chicago Approach to the Study of Law and Economics’, Wisconsin Law Review , 950-1080.
  • Markovits, Richard S. (1984), ‘Duncan’s Do Nots: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Determination of Legal Entitlements’, 36 Stanford Law Review , 1169 ff.
  • Mattei, Ugo and Pardolesi, Roberto (1991), ‘Law and Economics in Civil Law Countries: A Comparative Approach’, 11 International Review of Law and Economics , 265-275.
  • McCloskey, Donald N. (1988), ‘The Rhetoric of Law and Economics’, 86 Michigan Law Review , 752-767.
  • McGee, Robert W. (1996), Esaays in the History of Economic Thought , Dumont Institute for Public Policy Research. http:/ww.hili.com~dumontin
  • McKenzie, Richard B. (1978), ‘On the Methodological Boundaries of Economic Analysis’, 12 Journal of Economic Issues , 627-645.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1994), Ronald H. Coase , London, MacMillan.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1996), ‘Of Pangloss, Pigouvians, and Pragmatism: Ronald Coase on Social Cost Analysis’, 18 Journal of the History of Economic Thought , 96-114.
  • Melton, Gary B. (1990), ‘Law, Science, and Humanity: The Normative Foundation of Social Science in Law’, 14 Law and Human Behavior , 315-332.
  • Meltzer, Bernard D. (1966), ‘Aaron Director: A Personal Appreciation’, 9 Journal of Law and Economics , 5-6.
  • Mercuro, Nicholas (1989), ‘Towards a Comparative Institutional Approach to the Study of Law and Economics’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Law and Economics , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1-26.
  • Michelman, Frank I. (1979), ‘Microeconomic Appraisal of Constitutional Law: A Methodological Preface’, in Rubinfeld, Daniel (ed.), Essays on the Law and Economics of Local Governmen .
  • Michelman, Frank I. (1979), ‘A Comment on Some Uses and Abuses of Economics in Law’, 46 University of Chicago Law Review , 307-315.
  • Minda, Gary (1989), ‘The Jurisprudential Movements of the 1980s’, 50 Ohio State Law Journal , 599-662.
  • Minda, Gary (1989), ‘The Law and Economics and Critical Legal Studies Movement in American Law’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Law and Economics , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 87-122.
  • Mishan, Ezra J. (1976), ‘The Folklore of the Market: An Inquiry into the Economic Doctrines of the Chicago School’, in Samuels, Warren J. (ed.), The Chicago School of Political Economy , East Lansing (MI), Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Michigan State University, 95-166.
  • Mitchell, W.C. (1988), ‘Virginia, Rochester and Bloomington: Twenty-five Years of Public Choice and Political Science’, 56 Public Choice , 101-119.
  • Moorhouse, John C. (1978), ‘The Mechanistic Foundations of Economic Analysis’, 4 Reason Papers , 49-67.
  • Nagelkerke, J.J. (1979), ‘Beschouwingen over economische wetenschap en haar betekenis voor de rechtsvorming (Considerations about Economic Science and its Use)’, RMThemis , 356-385.
  • Nieuwenhuis, J.H. (1991), ‘Blinddoek En Balans in Het Milieurecht. Drie Manieren Om Belangen af te Wegen (Blindfold and Balance in Environmental Law. Three Ways of Balacing Interests)’, in X (ed.), Dilemma’s van Aansprakelijkheid , Zwolle, Tjeenk Willink, 37-51.
  • O’Driscoll, Gerald P., Jr. and Rizzo, Mario J. (1986), ‘Subjectivism, Uncertainty, and Rules’, in Kirzner, Israel M. (ed.), Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding. Essays in Honor of Ludwig M. Lachmann on his Eightieth Birthday , London, MacMillan, 252-267.
  • Ota, Shozo (1991), ‘Law and Economics in Japan: Hatching Stage’, 11 International Review of Law and Economics , 301-308.
  • Ott, Claus (1989), ‘Allokationseffizienz, Rechtsdogmatik und Rechtsprechung – die immanente škonomische RationalitŠt des Zivilrechts (Allocative Efficiency, Legal Dogmatics and Jurispr)’, in Ott, Claus and SchŠfer, Hans-Bernd (eds.), Allekationseffizienz in der Rechtsordnung , Berlin, Springer, 25-44.
  • Ott, Claus and SchŠfer, Hans-Bernd (1988), ‘Die škonomische Analyse des Rechts. Irrweg oder Chance wissenschaftlicher Rechtserkenntnis? (The Economic Analysis of Law. Wrong Track or Chanc)’, Juristenzeitung , 213-223.
  • Parisi, Francesco and Frezza, Giampaolo (1998), ‘Augusto Graziani (1865-1938)’, in Backhaus, JŸrgen G. (ed.), Elgar Companion to Law and Economics , Elgar- Ashgate.
  • Parisi, Francesco and Frezza, Giampaolo (1998), ‘Cesare Beccaria (1738-1794)’, in Backhaus, JŸrgen G. (ed.), Elgar Companion to Law and Economics , Elgar- Ashgate.
  • Parisi, Francesco and Frezza, Giampaolo (1998), ‘Achille Loria (1847-1943)’, in Backhaus, JŸrgen G. (ed.), Elgar Companion to Law and Economics , Elgar- Ashgate.
  • Parisi, Francesco and Frezza, Giampaolo (1998), ‘Pietro Trimarchi’, in Backhaus, JŸrgen G. (ed.), Elgar Companion to Law and Economics , Elgar- Ashgate.
  • Parkman, Allen M. (1985), ‘The Multiplier in English Fatal Accident Cases: What Happens when Judges Teach Judges Economics’, 5 International Review of Law and Economics , 187-197.
  • Pastor, Santos (1991), ‘Law and Economics in Spain’, 11 International Review of Law and Economics , 309-317.
  • Patinkin, Don (1979), ‘Keynes and Chicago’, 22 Journal of Law and Economics , 213-232.
  • Peltzman, Sam (1993), ‘George Stigler’s Contribution To the Economics of Regulation’, Journal of Political Economy .
  • Phillips, A. and Stevenson, Rodney E. (1974), ‘The Historical Development of Industrial Organization’, 6(3) History of Political Economy , 324-342.
  • Polinsky, A. Mitchell (1974), ‘Economic Analysis as a Potentially Defective Product: A Buyer’s Guide to Posner’s Economic Analysis of Law’, 87 Harvard Law Review , 1655-1681.
  • Pollock, Stewart G. (1988), ‘Economic Analysis at Work in Judicial Decision-Making’, Annual Survey of American Law , 133-136.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1978), ‘Final Remarks’, in Skogh, Gšran (ed.), Law and Economics. Report from a Symposium in Lund , Lund, Juridiska Fšreningen, 227-231.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1979), ‘Some Uses and Abuses of Economics in Law’, 46 University of Chicago Law Review , 281-306.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1987), ‘The Law and Economics Movement’, 77 American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings , 1-13.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1988), ‘Comment (on Donohue)’, 22 Law and Society Review , 927-929.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1988), ‘Conventionalism: The Key to Law as an Autonomous Discipline?’, 38 University of Toronto Law Journal , 333-354.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1989), ‘Foreword’, in Faure, Michael and Van Den Bergh, Roger (eds.), Essays in Law and Economics. Corporations, Accident Prevention and Compensation for Losses , Antwerpen, Maklu, 5-6.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1989), ‘The Future of Law and Economics: A Comment on Ellickson’, 65 Chicago-Kent Law Review , 57-62.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1990), ‘Rebuttal to Malloy’, 24 Valparaiso University Law Review , 183-184.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1993), ‘Gary Becker’s Contributions to Law and Economics’, 22 Journal of Legal Studies , 211-215.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1997), ‘The Future of the Law and Economics Movement in Europe’, 17 International Review of Law and Economics , 3-14.
  • Priest, George L. (1991), ‘Preface: Law and Economics after Europe’s Revolution’, in Weigel, Wolfgang (ed.), Economic Analysis of Law – A Collection of Applications , Vienna, …sterreichischer Wirtschaftsverlag, 5-7.
  • Prisching, Manfred (1979), ‘…konomische Rechtslehre? †ber die PrŠmissen und Grenzen des “Economic Approach” im Recht (Economic Jurisprudenz? On the Premisses and Limits of the Economic Approach to Law)’, in Freisitzer, Kurt, Holzer, Hans Ludwig, Mantl, Wolfgang and Hšflechner, Walter (eds.), Reformen des Rechts. Festschrift zur 200-Jahr-Feier der Rechtswissenschaftlichen FakulŠt der UniversitŠt Graz , Graz, Akademische Druck u. Verlagsanstalt, 995-1020.
  • Prisching, Manfred (1983), ‘†ber die Karriere einer Handlungstheorie. Der škonomische Weg auf dem Weg durch die Sozialwissenschaften (On the Career of a Behavioral Theory. The Economic Way on the way through the Social Sciences)’, 37 Zeitschrift fŸr philosophische Forschung , 256-274.
  • Prisching, Manfred (1987), ‘Regeln fŸr das Handeln. Soziale Entscheidungsmechanismen im Modernisierungsproze (Rules for Behavior. Social Decision Mechanisms in Modernization Process)’, 18 Rechtstheorie , 151-181.
  • Prychitko, David L. (198), ‘Methodological Individualism and the Austrian School’, 1 Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines , 171-179.
  • Puy Fraga, Pedro (1991), ‘La influencia de la Econom’a en el Derecho, veinticinco a–os despuŽs (The Influence of Economics on the Law)’, in X (ed.), Estudios en Homenaje al Profesor Carlos Otero D’az , Santiago, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Santiago, 541-575.
  • Raes, Koen (1988), ‘Onrechtmatige daad en de markt van pijn en smart (Tort and the Market for Pain and Sorrow)’, Recht en Kritiek , 102-125.
  • Raes, Koen (1988), ‘Recht en neo-klassieke economie (Law and Neo-classical Economics)’, 17 Rechtsfilosofie en Rechtstheorie , 29-30.
  • Raes, Koen (1990), ‘Het recht van de schaarste (The Law of Scarcity)’, Recht en Kritiek , 380-394.
  • Razeen, Sally (1997), ‘The Political Economy ofFrank Knight’, 8 Constitutional Political Economy , 123-138.
  • Reinert, Eric and Daastol, Arno (1997), ‘Exploring the Genesis of Economic Innovations : The Religious Gestalt-Switch and the Duty to Invent as Preconditions for Economic Growth’, 4 (2-3) European Journal of Law and Economics , 233-283.
  • Rheinstein, Max (ed.) (1954), Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society , Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press. Reprinted in Kronman, AnthonyT. and Posner, Richard A.(eds.), The Economics of Contract Law, Boston, Little Brown, 1979, 230-233.
  • Rizzo, Mario J. (1979), ‘Uncertainty, Subjectivity and the Economic Analysis of Law’, in Rizzo, Mario J. (ed.), Time, Uncertainty and Disequilibrium , Lexington (MA), Lexington Books, 71-89.
  • Rizzo, Mario J. (1980), ‘Law amid Flux: The Economics of Negligence and Strict Liability in Tort’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies , 291-318.
  • Rizzo, Mario J. (1980), ‘Can There Be a Principle of Explanation in Common Law Decisions? A Comment on Priest’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies , 423-427.
  • Rizzo, Mario J. (1985), ‘Rules versus Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Common Law’, 4 Cato Journal , 865-884. Reprinted in Dorn, James A. and Manne, Henry G. (eds.), Economic Liberties and the Judiciary, Fairfax, George Mason University Press, 1987, 225-244.
  • Robinson, Glen O. (1985), ‘Comment: Simplicity versus Complexity in the Law’, 4 Cato Journal , 885-891. Reprinted in Dorn, James A. and Manne, Henry G. (eds.),.
  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1988), ‘Progressive Law and Economics – and the New Administrative Law’, 98 Yale Law Journal , 341-368.
  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1989), ‘Law and Economics: Paradigm, Politics, or Philosophy’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Law and Economics , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 233-258.
  • Rowley, Charles K. (1981), ‘Social Sciences and the Law: The Relevance of Economic Theories’, 1 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies , 391-405.
  • Rowley, Charles K. (1989), ‘Public Choice and the Economic Analysis of Law’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Law and Economics , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 123-174.
  • Rubin, Paul H. (1980), ‘Predictability and the Economic Approach to Law: A Comment on Rizzo’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies , 319-334.
  • Rubin, Paul H. (1985), ‘Some Notes on Methodology in Law and Economics’, 7 Research in Law and Economics , 29-39.
  • Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1985), ‘Econometrics in the Courtroom’, 85 Columbia Law Review , 1048-1097.
  • Ryssdal, Stray A.C. (1995), Legal Realism & Economics as Behavior – A Scandinavian Look at the Economic Analysis of Law , Oslo, Juridisk Forlag.
  • Samuels, Warren J. (1971), ‘Interrelations between Legal and Economic Processes’, 14 Journal of Law and Economics , 435-450. Reprinted in Samuels, Warren J. and Schmid, A. Allen (eds.), Law and Economics: An Institutional Perspective, Boston, Nijhoff, 1981.
  • Samuels, Warren J. (1972), ‘Ecosystem Policy and the Problem of Power’, 2 Environmental Affairs , 580-596. Reprinted in Samuels, Warren J. and Schmid, A. Allen (eds.), Law and Economics: An Institutional Perspective, Boston, Nijhoff, 1981.
  • Samuels, Warren J. (1978), ‘Normative Premises in Regulatory Theory’, 1 Journal of Post Keynesian Economics , 100-114. Reprinted in Samuels, Warren J. and Schmid, A. Allen (eds.), Law and Economics: An Institutional Perspective, Boston, Nijhoff, 1981, 128-142.
  • Samuels, Warren J. (1981), ‘Maximization of Wealth as Justice: An Essay on Posnerian Law and Economics as Policy Analysis’, 60 Texas Law Review , 147-172.
  • Samuels, Warren J. (1989), ‘The Legal-Economic Nexus’, 57 George Washington Law Review , 1556-1578.
  • Samuels, Warren J. and Mercuro, Nicholas (1984), ‘Posnerian Law and Economics on the Bench’, 4 International Review of Law and Economics , 107-130.
  • Samuels, Warren J. and Mercuro, Nicholas (1986), ‘Wealth Maximalization and Judicial Decision-Making: The Issues Further Clarified’, 6 International Review of Law and Economics , 133-137.
  • Schanze, Erich (1978), ‘…konomische Analyse des Rechts in den U.S.A. / Verbindungslinien zur realistischen Tradition (Economic Analysis of Law in the U.S.A. – Origins a)’, in Assmann, Heinz-Dieter, Kirchner, Christian and Schanze, Erich (eds.), …konomische Analyse des Rechts , Kronberg, AthenŠum, 3-19.
  • Schanze, Erich (1981), ‘Der Beitrag von Coase zu Rechte und …konomie des Unternehmens (Coase’s Contribution to Law and Economics of Business Organizations)’, 137 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 694-701.
  • Schanze, Erich (1982), ‘Rechtsnorm und škonomisches KalkŸl (Legal Norm and Economic Calculus)’, 138 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 297-312.
  • Schanze, Erich (1986), ‘Potential and Limits of Economic Analysis: The Constitution of the Firm’, in Daintith, Terence and Teubner, Gunther (eds.), Contract and Organisation. Legal Analysis in the Light of Economic and Social Theory , Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 204-218.
  • Schanze, Erich (1991), ‘Research Perspectives of the Economic Approach to Institutions’, in Coljee, P.D., Franken, H., Heertje, A. and Kanning, W. (eds.), Law and Welfare Economics , Amsterdam, VU Amsterdam, 27-37.
  • Scherer, Frederic M. (1990), ‘Efficiency, Fairness, and the Early Contributions of Economists to the Antitrust Debate’, 29 Washburn Law Journal , 243-255.
  • Schlag, Pierre (1989), ‘The Problem of Transaction Costs’, 62 Southern California Law Review , 1661-1699.
  • Schmid, A. Allan (1987), Property, Power, and Public Choice: An Inquiry into Law and Economics , Westport, Greenwood, 332 p.
  • Schmid, A. Allan (1989), ‘Law and Economics: An Institutional Perspective’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Law and Economics , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 57-85.
  • Schmidtchen, Dieter (1991), ‘Jenseits von Maximierung, Gleichgewicht und Effizienz: Neuland fŸr die škonomische Analyse des Rechts? (Beyond Maximization, Balance and Efficiency: New L)’, in Ott, Claus and SchŠfer, Hans-Bernd (eds.), …konomische Probleme des Zivilrechts , Berlin, Springer, 316-343.
  • Schwab, Stewart J. (1989), ‘Coase Defends Coase: Why Lawyers Listen and Economists Do Not’, 87 Michigan Law Review , 1171-1198.
  • Schwartz, Louis (1979), ‘On the Uses of Economics: A Review of the Antitrust Treatises (Book Reviews)’, 128 University of Pennsylvania Law Review , 244 ff.
  • Schwartz, Warren F. (1987), ‘The Logic of the Law Revisited’, in Rowley, Charles K. (ed.), Democracy and Public Choice: Essays in Honor of Gordon Tullock , Oxford, Blackwell, 186-190.
  • Schweitzer, Serge (1987), ‘De “l’ancienne” ˆ la “nouvelle” Žconomie: Comment passe-t-on d’un paradigme ˆ l’autre (From “Old” to “New” Economics: How One Goes From One Paradigm to Another)’, in X (ed.), De “l’ancienne” ˆ la “nouvelle” Žconomie. Essais ˆ l’occasion de la dixime universitŽ d’ŽtŽ de la nouvelle Žconomie. Aix-en-Provence 1978-1987 , Aix-en-Provence, Librairie de l’UniversitŽ, 257-274.
  • Scott, Kenneth E. (1983), ‘Answers Are More Needed than Perspectives’, 33 Journal of Legal Education , 285-287.
  • Seita, Alex Y. (1989), ‘Common Myths in the Economic Analysis of Law’, Brigham Young University Law Review , 993-1112.
  • Senn, Peter (1997), ‘What is the Place of Christian Wolff in the History of the Social Sciences?’, 4 (2-3) European Journal of Law and Economics , 147-232.
  • Shavell, Steven (1987), Economic Analysis of Accident Law , Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 312 p.
  • Skogh, Gšran (1991), ‘Law and Economics in Sweden’, 11 International Review of Law and Economics , 319-324.
  • Soderbaum, Peter (1987), ‘Environmental Management: A Non- Traditional Approach’, 21 Journal of Economic Issues , 139-165.
  • Sproule-Jones, Mark (ed.) (1984), Methodological Individualism and Public Choice , London, Sage.
  • Stigler, George J. (1955), ‘The Nature and Originality in Scientific Progress’, 22 Economica , 1-15.
  • Stigler, George J. (1972), ‘The Law and Economics of Public Policy: A Plea to the Scholars’, 1 Journal of Legal Studies , 1-12.
  • Stigler, George J. (1974), ‘Henry Calvert Simons’, 17 Journal of Law and Economics , 1-5.
  • Stigler, George J. (1983), ‘What Does an Economist Know?’, 33 Journal of Legal Education , 311-313.
  • Stigler, George J. (1988), Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist , New York, Basic Books, 228 p.
  • Stigler, George J. (1992), ‘Law or Economics?’, 35 Journal of Law and Economics , 455-468.
  • Strasser, Kurt A., Bard, Robert L. and Arthur, H. Thomas (1982), ‘A Reader’s Guide to the Uses and Limits of Economic Analysis with Emphasis on Corporation Law’, 33 Mercer Law Review , 571-593.
  • Symposium (1988), ‘The Crisis in Legal Theory and the Revival of Classical Jurisprudence’, 73 Cornell Law Review , 281-446.
  • The Secretary (1959), ‘The Sumptuary Manifesto’, 2 Journal of Law and Economics , 120-123.
  • Trebilcock, Michael J. and Hartle, D.G. (1982), ‘The Choice of Governing Instrument’, 2 International Review of Law and Economics , 29-46.
  • Tribe, Laurence H. (1971), ‘Trial by Mathematics Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process’, 84 Harvard Law Review , 1329-1393.
  • Tribe, Laurence H. (1973), ‘Technology Assessment and the Fourth Discontinuity: The Limits of Instrumental Rationality’, 46 Southern California Law Review , 617-660.
  • Tullock, Gordon (1973), ‘Economic Imperialism’, in Buchanan, James M. and Tollison, Robert D. (eds.), Theory of Public Choice: Political Applications of Economics , Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
  • Tullock, Gordon (1986), ‘Wanted: New Public-Choice Theories’, in Anderson, Martin J. (ed.), The Unfinished Agenda: Essays on the Political Economy of Government Policy in honour of Arthur Seldon , London, Institute of Economic Affairs, 13-27.
  • Turnbull, Shann (1997), Evolution of Business and the Corporate Structure , Corporate Directors’ Diploma Course, University of New England, Armidale, Australia, Topic 1.1.
  • Ulen, Thomas S. (1989), ‘Law and Economics: Settled Issues and Open Questions’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Law and Economics , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 201-231.
  • Van den Bergh, Roger and Heremans, Dirk (1986), ‘Over krommen en rechten. Een reactie op de kritiek van Kruithof ten aanzien van de economische analyse van het recht (On Curves and Lines: A Reaction on the Critique of Kruithof on Economic Analysis of Law)’, 50 Rechtskundig Weekblad , 1649-1668.
  • Van den Bergh, Roger and Heremans, Dirk (1987), ‘Recht en economie (Law and Economics)’, 32 Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management , 139-164.
  • Van Dun, Frank (1986), ‘Economics and the Limits of Value-Free Science’, 11 Reason Papers , 17-32.
  • Vanbuggenhout, Willy (1987), ‘De economische benadering van het recht. Haar nut en grenzen voor de praktijk(bedrijfs)jurist (The Economic Approach of Law: Its Use and Limits f)’, Vlaams Jurist Vandaag , 27-30.
  • Veljanovski, Cento G. (1982), The New Law-and-Economics. A Research Review , Oxford, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, 169 p.
  • Veljanovski, Cento G. (1985), ‘Economic Theorizing About Tort’, Current Legal Problems , 117-140.
  • Wagner, Richard E. (1987), ‘James M. Buchanan: Constitutional Political Economist’, 11(1) Regulation , 13-17.
  • Wald, Patricia M. (1987), ‘Limits on the Use of Economic Analysis in Judicial Decisionmaking’, 50(4) Law and Contemporary Problems , 225-244.
  • Walz, W. Rainer and Wienstroh, Claas (1983), ‘Die Fehlgeschlagene Investition (The Case of the Investment Failure)’, in Walz, W. Rainer and Rascher-Friesenhausen, Hein (eds.), Sozialwissenschaften im Zivilrecht: FŠlle und Lšsungen in Ausbild und PrŸfung , Neuwied und Darmstadt, Luchterhand, 52-75.
  • Weigel, Wolfgang (1990), ‘…konomie und Recht – Eine EinfŸhrung (Economics and Law – An Introduction)’, 31(3-4) Das šffentliche Haushaltswesen in …sterreich , 169-198.
  • Weigel, Wolfgang (1991), ‘Prospects for Law and Economics in Civil Law Countries: Austria’, 11 International Review of Law and Economics , 325-329.
  • Whichard, Willis P. (1987), ‘A Common Law Judge’s View of the Appropriate Use of Economics in Common Law Adjudication’, 50(4) Law and Contemporary Problems , 253-263.
  • White, Barbara (1987), ‘Coase and the Courts: Economics for the Common Man.’, 72 Iowa Law Review , 577-635.
  • Whitford, William C. (1985), ‘Ian Macneil’s Contribution to Contracts Scholarship’, Wisconsin Law Review , 545-560.
  • Wilber, Charles K. and Wisman, Jon D. (1976), ‘The Chicago School: Positivism or Ideal Type’, in Samuels, Warren J. (ed.), The Chicago School of Political Economy , East Lansing (MI), Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Michigan State University, 79-94.
  • Williams, Philip L. (1990), ‘The Attitudes of the Economics Professions in Britain and the United States to the Trust Movement, 1890 – 1914’, in Hey, John D. and Winch, Donald (eds.), A Century of Economics: 100 years of the Royal Economic Society and the Economic Journal , Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1986), ‘An Autobiographical Sketch’, in Williamson, Oliver E. (ed.), Economic Organization: Firms, Markets and Policy C , New York, New York University Press, 11-18.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1990), ‘A Comparison of Alternative Approaches to Economic Organization’, 146 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 61-71.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1991), ‘Intellectual Foundations: The Need for a Broader View’, 33 Journal of Legal Education , 210-216.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. and Ouchi, William G. (1983), ‘The Markets and Hierarchies Programme of Research: Origins, Implications, Prospects’, in Francis, Arthur, Et Al. (eds.), Power, Efficiency and Institutions , London, Heinemann, 13-34.
  • Wladimiroff, M. (1991), ‘Rechtseconomie en strafrecht: enige kritische kanttekeningen (Law-and-Economics and Criminal Law: Some Critical Remarks)’, in Hondius, E.H., Schippers, J.J. and Siegers, J. (eds.), Rechtseconomie en Recht , Zwolle, Tjeenk Willink, 181-186.
  • Wonnell, Christopher T. (1986), ‘Contract Law and the Austrian School of Economics’, 54 Fordham Law Review , 507-543.
  • X (1984), ‘Note: Efficiency and the Rule of “Free Contract”: A Critique of Two Models of Law and Economics’, 97 Harvard Law Review , 978-996.
  • X (1985), ‘Note: The Rule of Law in Residential Associati ons’, 99 Harvard Law Review , 472-490.
  • Zeisel, Hans (1973), ‘Reflections on Experimental Techniques in the Law’, 2 Journal of Legal Studies , 107-124.
Copied to clipboard