In general, a mistake can be defined as a belief that is not in accord with the facts,[1] and it has been specified that the term "mistake" refers to the party's beliefs at the time the contract is made, not the party's acts.[2] However, "mistake" in a contract has also been defined as an unintentional act or omission arising from ignorance, surprise, or misplaced confidence, which is so substantial and fundamental as to defeat the object of the parties.[3]
Reformation may be granted to correct an erroneous instrument to express the true intent of the parties to the instrument.[4]
1
Restatement Second, Contracts § 151
.
2
Associated Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Northwest Cascade, Inc., 149 Wash. App. 429, 203 P.3d 1077 (Div. 2 2009)
.
3
Belk v. Martin, 136 Idaho 652, 39 P.3d 592 (2001)
.
4
Am. Jur. 2d, Reformation of Instruments § 2
.
FindLaw’s hosted excerpts from American Jurisprudence 2d are provided courtesy of the publisher of American Jurisprudence 2d, the industry-leading legal encyclopedia offering unparalleled breadth of coverage of all fields of American law. For full access to American Jurisprudence 2d, including annotations and citations, please visit your local law library or visit Am Jur 2d on Thomson Reuters Westlaw.
FindLaw’s hosted version of American Jurisprudence 2d may not reflect the most recent law. Please verify the status of the section you are researching at your local law library or via Westlaw before relying on it for your legal needs.