Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Encyclopedia of Law & Economics – 0800 Norms and Values In Law & Economics

  • Adelstein, Richard P. (1989), ‘Islands of Conscious Power: Louis D. Brandeis and the Modern Corporation’, 63 Business History Review , 614-656.
  • Adelstein, Richard P. (1991), ‘Deciding for Bigness: Constitutional Choice and the Growth of Firms’, 2(1) Constitutional Political Economy , 7-30.
  • Armentano, Dominick T. (1987), ‘Comment: Efficiency, Liberty, and Antitrust Policy’, in Dorn, James A. and Manne, Henry G. (eds.), Economic Liberties and the Judiciary , Fairfax, George Mason University Press, 309-316.
  • Arup, Christopher (1982), ‘Accounting for the Social Costs of Technology Through the Legal Process’, in Cranston, Ross and Schick, Anne (eds.), Law and Economics , Canberra, Australian National University, 25-38.
  • Ault, David E. and Rutman, Gilbert L. (1985), ‘Comment (on Bilmes’ Paper)’, 7 Research in Law and Economics , 149-156.
  • Baker, C. Edwin (1974), ‘Utility and Rights: Two Justifications for State Action Increasing Inequality’, 84 Yale Law Journal , 39-59.
  • Baker, C. Edwin (1975), ‘The Ideology of the Economic Analysis of Law’, 5 Philosophy And Public Affairs , 3-48.
  • Baker, C. Edwin (1980), ‘Starting Points in the Economic Analysis of Law’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 939-972.
  • Bandow, Doug (1987), ‘The Conservative Judicial Agenda: A Critique’, in Dorn, James A. and Manne, Henry G. (eds.), Economic Liberties and the Judiciary , Fairfax, George Mason University Press, 257-271.
  • Bebchuk, Lucian Arye (1980), ‘The Pursuit of a Bigger Pie: Can Everyone Expect a Bigger Slice?’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 671-709.
  • Benson, Bruce L. (1988), ‘Legal Evolution in Primitive Societies’, 144 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics , 772-788.
  • Benson, Bruce L. (1989), ‘Enforcement of Private Property Rights in Primitive Societies: Law Without Government’, 9 Journal of Libertarian Studies , 1-26.
  • Benson, Bruce L. (1989), ‘The Spontaneous Evolution of Commercial Law’, 55 Southern Economic Journal , 644-661.
  • Benson, Bruce L. (1990), ‘Customary Law With Private Means of Resolving Disputes and Dispensing Justice: A Description of a Modern System of Law and Order Without State Coercion’, 9 Journal of Libertarian Studies , 25-42. Reprinted in as “Law and Order Without State Coercion”, in Veljanovski, Cento (ed.), Regulation, Regulators and the Market, 1991, London, Institute of Economic Affairs, 159-179.
  • Benson, Bruce L. (1991), ‘Reciprocal Exchange as the Basis for Recognition of Law: Examples from American History’, 10 Journal of Libertarian Studies , 53-82.
  • Benson, Bruce L. (1991), ‘An Evolutionary Contractarian View of Primitive Law: The Institutions and Incentives Arising Under Customary American Indian Law’, 5 Review of Austrian Economics , 65-89.
  • Benson, Bruce L. (1992), ‘The Evolution of Values and Institutions in a Free Society: The Under-Pinnings of a Market Economy’, 5 International Journal on the Unity of Sciences , 411-442. Reprinted in Radnitzky, Gerard and Bouillon, Hardy (eds.), Values and the Social Order Vol.I, 1995, Aldershot, Avebury, 87-125.
  • Benson, Bruce L. (1993), ‘The Impetus for Recognizing Private Property and Adopting Ethical Behavior in a Market Economy: Natural Law, Government Law, or Evolving Self-Interest’, 6 Review of Austrian Economics , 43-80.
  • Benson, Bruce L. (1994), ‘Emerging From the Hobbesian Jungle: Might Takes and Makes Rights’, 5 Constitutional Political Economy , 129-158. Reprinted inTranslated into Spanish and republished (1995) Las Instituciones y Los Derechos de Propiedad al Emerger de la Jungla Hobbesiana: La Fuerza Quita los Reprinted Derechos y los Crea Libertas, 12, 35-75.
  • Benson, Bruce L. (1994), ‘Legal Philosophy’, in Boettke, Peter J. (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics , London, Edward Elgar, 270-275.
  • Bilmes, Jack (1985), ‘Freedom and Regulation: An Anthropological Critique of Free Market Ideology’, 7 Research in Law and Economics , 123-147.
  • Bilmes, Jack (1985), ‘Rejoinder to Ault and Rutman’s Comment’, 7 Research in Law and Economics , 157-158.
  • Bloustein, E.J. (1978), ‘Privacy is Dear at any Price: A Response to Professor Posner’s Economic Theory’, 12 Georgia Law Review , 421-495.
  • Blum, Walter J. and Kalven, Harry, Jr. (1967), ‘The Empty Cabinet of Dr. Calabresi: Auto Accidents and General Deterrence’, 34 University of Chicago Law Review , 239-273. Reprinted in Rabin, Robert L. (ed.), Perspectives on Tort Law, Boston, Little Brown, 1983, 178-190.
  • Bouckaert, Boudewijn (1984), ‘Effici‘ntie of rechtvaardigheid: het onvermijdelijk dilemma? (Efficiency or Justice: the Unavoidable Dilemma?)’, 29 Tijdschrift voor Sociale Wetenschappen , 101-133.
  • Bovens, M.A.P. and Witteveen, W.J. (1987), ‘Bruce Ackerman over sociale rechtvaardigheid, de rol van de rechter en “Law and Economics” (Bruce Ackerman on Social Justice, the Role of the Judiciary and “Law and Economics”)’, Staatkundig Jaarboek, Ars Aequi Libri , 255-278.
  • Bowers, James W. (1991), ‘Whither What Hits the Fan? Murphy’s Law, Bankruptcy Theory, and the Elementary Economics of Loss Distribution’, 26 Georgia Law Review , 27 ff.
  • Brennan, Geoffrey and Buchanan, James M. (1981), ‘The Normative Purpose of Economic ‘Science’: Rediscovery of an Eighteenth Century Method’, 1 International Review of Law and Economics , 155-166.
  • Brennan, Geoffrey and Buchanan, James M. (1988), ‘Is Public Choice Immoral? the Case for the ‘Nobel’ Lie’, 74 Virginia Law Review , 179-189.
  • Breyer, Stephen G. (1987), ‘Economics and Judging: An Afterword on Cooter and Wald’, 50(4) Law and Contemporary Problems , 245-252.
  • Bromley, Daniel W. (1990), ‘The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis’, 19 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 86-107.
  • Buchanan, James M. (1962), ‘The Relevance of Pareto Optimality’, 6 Journal of Conflict Resolution , 341-354.
  • Buxbaum, Hertig and Hirsch, Hopt (eds.), European Economic and Business Law, Legal and Economic Analyses on Integration and Harmonization , Berlin, 401 p.
  • Calabresi, Guido (1980), ‘An Exchange about Law and Economics: A Letter to Ronald Dworkin’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 553-562.
  • Calsamiglia, Albert (1988), ‘Justicia, eficiencia y Derecho (Equity, Efficiency and the Law)’, 1 Revista del Centro de Estudios Constitucionales , 327 ff.
  • Campbell, David (1996), ‘The Relational Constitution of the Discrete Contract’, in Campbell, David and Vincent-Jones, Peter (eds.), Contract and Economic Organisation: Socio-legal Initiatives , Aldershot, Dartmouth, 40-66.
  • Campbell, David (1997), ‘The Relational Constitution of Contract and the Limits of Economics: Kenneth Arrow on the Social Background of Markets’, in Deakin, Simon and Michie, Jonathan (eds.), Contracts, Co-operation and Competition: Studies in Economics, Management and Law , Oxford, Oxford University Press, 529-596.
  • Campbell, David and Harris, Donald R. (1993), ‘Flexibility in Long-term Contractual Relationships: The Role of Co-operation’, 20 Journal of Law and Society , 166-191.
  • Cass, Ronald A. (1987), ‘Coping With Life, Law, and Markets: A Comment on Posner and the Law-and-Economics Debate’, 67 Boston University Law Review , 73-97.
  • Centi, Jean-Pierre (1987), ‘Quel critre d’efficience pour l’analyse Žconomique du droit (Which Efficiency Criterion for Economic Analysis o)’, 2 Revue de la Recherche Juridique .
  • Chami, Ralph and Fischer, Jeffrey (1995), ‘Community Banking, Monitoring and the Clinton Plan’, 14 Cato Journal , 493-508.
  • Chapman, Bruce (1979), ‘Law, Morality and the Lgic of Choice: An Economist’s view’, 29 University of Toronto Law Journal , 114-137.
  • Chapman, Bruce (1982), ‘Individual Rights and Collective Rationality: Some Implications for Economic Analysis of Law’, 10 Hofstra Law Review , 455-481.
  • Chapman, Bruce (1983), ‘Rights As Constraints: Nozick vs Sen’, 15 Theory and Decision , 1-10.
  • Chapman, Bruce (1987), ‘Raising Johnny To Be Good: A Prolematic Case for Economic Analysis of Law’, 34 University of Toronto Law Journal , 358-376.
  • Chapman, Bruce and Quinn, J.J. (1982), ‘Efficiency, Liberty and Equality: Three Ethical Justifications for Regulatory Reform’, 20 Osgoode Hall Law Journal , 512-535.
  • Cohen, Jane Maslow (1987), ‘Posnerism, Pluralism, Pessimism’, 67 Boston University Law Review , 105-175.
  • Coleman, James S. (1987), ‘Norms as Social Capital’, in Radnitzky, Gerard and Bernholz, Peter (eds.), Economic Imperialism: The Economic Approach Applied Outside the Field of Economics , New York, Paragon House, 133-155.
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1980), ‘Efficiency, Exchange and Auction: Philosophic Aspects of the Economic Approach to Law’, 68 California Law Review , 221-249.
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1980), ‘Efficiency, Utility, and Wealth Maximization’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 509-551.
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1982), ‘The Economic Analysis of Law’, in Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W. (eds.), Nomos XXIV: Ethics, Economics and the Law , New York, New York University Press, 83-103.
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1982), ‘Corrective Justice and Wrongful Gain’, 11 Journal of Legal Studies , 421-440.
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1984), ‘Economics and the Law: A Critical Review of the Foundations of the Economic Approach to Law’, 94 Ethics , 649-679.
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1988), Markets, Morals and the Law , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 393 p.
  • Commons, John R. (1932), ‘The Problem of Correlating Law, Economics and Ethics’, 8 Wisconsin Law Review , 3-26.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1983), ‘Justice and Mathematics: Two Simple Ideas’, in Skurski, Roger B. (ed.), New Directions in Economic Justice , Notre Dame Press.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1987), ‘Justice At the Confluence of Law and Economics’, 1 Social Justice Research , 67 ff.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1987), ‘Liberty, Efficiency, and Law’, 50 Law and Contemporary Problems , 141-163.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1987), ‘Torts As the Union of Liberty and Efficiency: An Essay on Causation’, 63 Chicago-Kent Law Review , 522-551.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1989), ‘Rawls’s Lexical Orderings Are Good Economics’, 5 Economics and Philosophy , 47 ff.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1989), ‘The Best Right Laws: Value Foundations of the Economic Analysis of Law’, 64-5 Notre Dame Law Review , 816-819.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1989), ‘The Best Right Laws: Value Foundations of the Economic Analysis of Law’, 64 Notre Dame Law Review , 817-837. Reprinted in Levit, Nancy and Hayman, Robert (Eds.), Jurisprudence: Contemporary Readings, Problems, and Narratives, West, 1994.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1990), ‘Merit Goods: Some Thoughts on the Unthinkable’, in Brennan, Geoffrey and Walsh, Cliff Walsh (eds.), Rationality, Individualism, and Public Policy , Canberra, Centre for Research in Federal Financial Relations, 186-192.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1994), ‘Structural Adjudication and the New Law Merchant: A Model of Decentralized Law’, 14 International Review of Law and Economics , 215-231. Reprinted under the title, “The Structural Approach to Decentralizing Law: A Theory of Games and Norms,” in a book edited by Gerard Hertig.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1996), ‘Punitive Damages’, in Gray, Christopher B. (ed.), Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia , New York, Garland Inc..
  • Cooter, Robert D. and Gordley, James (1994), ‘The Cultural Case for Inequality: An Economic Model of Merit Goods Based on Aristotelian Ideas of Akrasia and Distributive Justice’, in Cowan, Robin and Rizzo, Mario J. (eds.), Profits and Moralilty , Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 150-175.
  • Cooter, Robert D. and Rappoprt, Peter (1984), ‘Were the Ordinalists Wrong About Welfare Economics?’, 22 Journal of Economic Literature , 507 ff. Reprinted in Blaug, Mark (Ed.), Pioneers in Economics Section IV, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, forthcoming.
  • Cosentino, Fabrizio (1988), ‘Autonomia privata e paternalismo del legislatore nella prospettiva dell’analisi economica del diritto (Individual Autonomy and the Paternalism of the Legislator: An EAL Perspective)’, Rivista critica del diritto privato , 473-511.
  • Cotter, Thomas F. (1996), ‘Legal Pragmatism and the Law and Economics Movement’, 84 Georgetown Law Journal , 2071-2141.
  • Craswell, Richard (1993), ‘On the Uses of “Trust”‘, 36 Journal of Law and Economics , 487-500.
  • Dau-Schmidt, Kenneth G. (1984), ‘Sentencing Antitrust Offenders: Reconciling Economic Theory with Legal Theory’, 9 Wm. Mitchell Law Review , 75 ff.
  • Dau-Schmidt, Kenneth G. (1990), ‘An Economic Analysis of the Criminal Law as a Preference Shaping Policy’, Duke Law Journal , 1-38.
  • Dau-Schmidt, Kenneth G. (1995), ‘Legal Prohibitions as More Than Prices: The Economic Analysis of Preference Shaping Policies in the Law’, in Malloy, Robin P. and Braun, Christopher K. (eds.), Law and Economics: New and Critical Perspectives , New York, Peter Lang, 153 ff.
  • De Geest, Gerrit (1990), ‘Public Choice, mensbeeld en ideologie (Public Choice, Model of Man and Ideology)’, 19 Rechtsfilosofie en Rechtstheorie , 109-122.
  • De Geest, Gerrit (1994), Economische analyse van het contracten- en quasi-contractenrecht: een onderzoek naar de wetenschappelijke waarde van de rechtseconomie (Economic Analysis of Contract Law and Quasi Contract Law: A Study on the Scientic Value of Law and Economics) , Antwerpen, Maklu, 568 p.
  • De Meza, David and Gould, J.R. (1992), ‘The Social Efficiency of Private Decision to Enforce Property Rights’, 100 Journal of Political Economy , 561-580.
  • Demsetz, Harold (1979), ‘Ethics and Efficiency in Property Rights Systems’, in Rizzo, Mario J. (ed.), Time, Uncertainty and Disequilibrium , Lexington (MA), Lexington Books, 97-116.
  • Demsetz, Harold (1982), ‘Professor Michelman’s Unnecessary and Futile Search for the Philosopher’s Touchstone’, in Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W. (eds.), Nomos XXIV: Ethics, Economics and the Law , New York, New York University Press, 41-47.
  • Dion, Michel (ed.) (1992), L’Žthique ou le profit (Ethics or Profit) , MontrŽal, Fides.
  • Dobbs, I. (1981), ‘Externality, Efficiency and the Pareto Principle’, 1 International Review of Law and Economics , 167-181.
  • Donohue, John J. III (1988), ‘Law and Economics: The Road not Taken’, 22 Law and Society Review , 903-926.
  • Donohue, John J. III (1994), ‘Liberal Law and Economics (Reviewing Rethinking the Progressive Agenda by Susan-Rose Ackerman)’, 13 Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , 192 ff.
  • Dworkin, Ronald M. (1980), ‘Is Wealth a Value?’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies , 191-226. Reprinted in Dworkin, Ronald M.
  • Dworkin, Ronald M. (1980), ‘Why Efficiency?’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 563-590. Reprinted in Dworkin, Ronald M.,.
  • Egger, J.B. (1979), ‘Efficiency Is Not a Substitute for Ethics’, in Rizzo, Mario J. (ed.), Time, Uncertainty and Disequilibrium , Lexington (MA), Lexington Books, 117-125.
  • Ehrlich, Isaac (1982), ‘On Positive Methodology, Ethics, and Polemics in Deterrence Research’, 22 British Journal of Criminology , 124-139.
  • Englard, Izhak (1982), ‘The Failure of Economic Justice’, 45 Harvard Law Review , 1162-1178.
  • Eschenburg, Rolf (1978), ‘Vertragstheoretisches Denken in der …konomie (Contractual Theory in Economics)’, 23 Hamburger Jahrbuch fŸr Wirtschaft und Gesellschaftspolitik , 221-236.
  • Farber, Daniel A. (1989), ‘Review Essay: Environmentalism, Economics and the Public Interest’, 41 Stanford Law Review , 1021-1043.
  • Feinman, Jay M. (1988), ‘Practical Legal Studies and Critical Legal Studies’, 87(3) Michigan Law Review , 724-731.
  • Fletcher, George P. (1972), ‘Fairness and Utility in Tort Theory’, 85 Harvard Law Review , 537-573. Reprinted in Rabin, Robert L. (ed.), Perspectives on Tort Law, Boston, Little Brown, 1983, 239-255.
  • Fletcher, George P. (1987), ‘Why Kant’, 87 Columbia Law Review , 421-432.
  • Freeman, Donald (1981), ‘Value Maximization and Welfare Theory’, 10 Journal of Legal Studies , 409-419.
  • Friedman, Lawrence M. (1984), ‘Two Faces of Law’, Wisconsin Law Review , 13-35.
  • Goldberg, Victor P. and Olmstead, Alan L. (1975), ‘Institutional Change and American Economic Growth–A Critique of Davis and North’, 12 Explorations in Economic History , 193-210.
  • Gordon, Scott (1980), Welfare, Justice and Freedom , New York.
  • Grady, Mark F. (1994), ‘Modern Accident Law Does Not Fit Corrective Justice Theory’, 2 Annual Review of Law & Ethics , 7 ff.
  • Grant, Robin F. (1989), ‘Judge Richard Posner’s Wealth Maximization Principle: Another Form of Utilitarianism?’, 10 Cardozo Law Review , 815-845.
  • Guest, Stephen F.D. (1984), ‘Utilitarianism, Economics and the Common Law’, 5 Otago Law Review , 656-663.
  • Hammond (1982), ‘The Economics of Justice and the Criterion of Wealth Maximization’ (Book Review),’, 91 Yale Law Journal , 1493-1507.
  • Hanak, Andr‡s (1979), ‘Neoklasszicista Justitia (Neo- classicist Justitia)’, 12 Jogtudom‡nyi Kšzlšny , 855-859.
  • Harsanyi, John C. (1977), ‘Morality and the Theory of Rational Behaviour’, 44 Social Research .
  • Hasen, Richard L. (1996), ‘Voting Without Law?’, 144 University of Pennsylvania Law Review , 2135 ff.
  • Hatzis, Aristides N. (1996), Eisagoge sten Oikonomike Analyse tou Dikaiou (Introduction to the Economic Analysis of Law) , Thessaloniki, Aristotle University, Department of History, Philosophy & Sociology.
  • Hatzis, Aristides N. (1996), ‘Neofileleutherismos, Dikaio & Oikonomike Analyse ton Thesmon: Eisagoge ste Melete ton Neon Oikonomikon Theorion gia to Dikaio, ten Koinonia kai ten Politike (The so-called “Neo-Liberalism”, the Law and the Economic Analysis of Institutions: Introduction to the Study of the New Economic Theories About the Law, Society and Politics)’, 6 Aissymnetes .
  • Hayashida, Seimei (1993), ‘Jissenteki Suiron to Ho to Keizaigaku (Practical Reasoning and Law & Economics)’, XXXHotetsugaku Nempo 1992 (Annual of Legal Philosophy 1992) , 44-59.
  • Heertje, A. (1966), ‘Conflictstof voor juristen en economen (Conflict Material for Lawyers and Economists)’, 15 Ars Aequi , 14-16.
  • Heller, Thomas C. (1976), ‘The Importance of Normative Decisionmaking: The Limitations of Legal Economics As A Basis for A Liberal Jurisprudence’, Wisconsin Law Review , 385-502.
  • Hol, A.M. (1990), ‘Effici‘ntie als instrument en als norm. Enkele rechtstheoretische kanttekeningen bij de economische analyse van het recht (Efficiency as Instrument and Norm: Some Remarks fr)’, 39(10) Ars Aequi , 632-644.
  • Hol, A.M. (1991), ‘Rechten En Doeleinden. Enkele Morele Aspecten Van Juridische Aansprakelijkheid (Rights and Goals. Some Moral Aspects of Legal Liability)’, in X (ed.), Dilemma’s van Aansprakelijkheid , Zwolle, Tjeenk Willink, 127-142.
  • Horwitz, Morton J. (1980), ‘Law and Economics: Science or Politics?’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 905-912.
  • Hovenkamp, Herbert J. (1991), ‘Legal Policy and the Endowment Effect’, 20 Journal of Legal Studies , 225-247.
  • Huang, Peter H. and Wu, Ho-Mou (1994), ‘More Order without More Law: A Theory of Social Norms and Organizational Cultures’, 10 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization , 390-406.
  • Johnsen, D. Bruce (1986), ‘Wealth Is Value’, 15 Journal of Legal Studies , 263-288.
  • Katz, Avery (1996), ‘Taking Private Ordering Seriously’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review .
  • Katz, Avery (1996), ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Economics’, Michigan Law Review .
  • Keenan, Donald C. (1981), ‘Value Maximization and Welfare Theory’, 10 Journal of Legal Studies , 409-419.
  • Kelman, Mark G. (1979), ‘Consumption Theory, Production Theory and Ideology in the Coase Theorem’, 52 Southern California Law Review , 669-698.
  • Kelman, Mark G. (1979), ‘Choice and Utility’, Wisconsin Law Review , 769-797.
  • Kelman, Mark G. (1983), ‘Misunderstanding Social Life: A Critique of the Core Premises of “Law and Economics”‘, 33 Journal of Legal Education , 274-284.
  • Kelman, Mark G. (1987), ‘The Necessary Myth of Objective Causation Judgments in Liberal Political Theory’, 63 Chicago-Kent Law Review , 579-637.
  • Kennedy, Duncan (1976), ‘Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication’, 89 Harvard Law Review , 1685-1778. Reprinted in Kronman, Anthony T. and Posner, Richard A. (eds.), The Economics of Contract Law, Boston, Little Brown, 1979, 100-107.
  • Kennedy, Duncan (1981), ‘Cost-Benefit of Entitlement Problems: A Critique’, 33 Stanford Law Review , 387-445.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A., ‘Private Ordering in the Shadow of the Law’, in Garth, Levine, and Sarat (eds.), Justice and Power in the Study of Law and Society , Northwestern University Press.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1980), ‘A Guide to the Perplexed Claims of Efficiency in the Law’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 591-639.
  • Kronman, Anthony T. (1980), ‘Wealth Maximization as a Normative Principle’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies , 227-242.
  • Lee, Dwight R. (1988), ‘Politics, Ideology, and the Power of Public Choice’, 74 Virginia Law Review , 191-198.
  • Malloy, Robin Paul (1986), ‘Equating Human Rights and Property Rights – the Need for Moral Judgment in an Economic Analysis of Law and Social Policy’, 47 Ohio State Law Journal , 163-177.
  • Malloy, Robin Paul (1988), ‘The Merits of the Smithian Critique: A Final Word on Smith and Posner’, 36 University of Kansas Law Review , 266-274.
  • Malloy, Robin Paul (1988), ‘The Invisible Hand or the Sleight of Hand? Adam Smith, Richard Posner and the Philosophy of Law and Economics’, 36 University of Kansas Law Review , 209 ff.
  • Malloy, Robin Paul (1988), ‘Market Philosophy in the Legal Tension Between Children’s Autonomy and Parental Authority’, 21 Indiana Law Review , 889-900.
  • Malloy, Robin Paul (1990), ‘The Limits of Science in Legal Discourse – A Reply to Posner’, 24 Valparaiso University Law Review , 175-181.
  • Malloy, Robin Paul (1990), ‘Is Law and Economics Moral? – Humanistic Economics and a Classical Liberal Critique of Posner’s Economic Analysis’, 24 Valparaiso University Law Review , 147-161.
  • Markovits, Richard S. (1983), ‘Legal Analysis and the Economic Analysis of Allocative Efficiency: A Response to Professor Posner’s Reply’, 11 Hofstra Law Review , 667-689.
  • McGee, Robert W. (1992), Business Ethics and Common Sense , Quorum Books, 302 p.
  • McGee, Robert W. (1994), A Trade Policy for Free Societies:The Case Against Protectionism , Quorum Books, 197 p.
  • McGee, Robert W. (1996), Taxation, Ethics & Public Policy , Dumont Institute for Public Policy Research. http:/ww.hili.com~dumontin
  • McGee, Robert W. (1996), The New Prohibitionism: The movement To regulate Personal Behavior , Dumont Institute for Public Policy Research. http:/ww.hili.com~dumontin
  • McGee, Robert W. (1996), Some Thoughts on Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy , Dumont Institute for Public Policy Research. http:/ww.hili.com~dumontin
  • McGee, Robert W. (1996), Economics & Ethics , Dumont Institute for Public Policy Research. http:/ww.hili.com~dumontin
  • McGee, Robert W. (1996), Essays on accounting,Taxation & Public Finance , Dumont Institute for Public Policy Research. http:/ww.hili.com~dumontin
  • McGee, Robert W. (1996), Essays in Law & Economics from a Right Perspective , Dumont Institute for Public Policy Research. http:/ww.hili.com~dumontin
  • McGee, Robert W. and Block, Walter E. (1996), A Rights Perspective on Law,Economics & Ethics , Dumont Institute for Public Policy Research. http:/ww.hili.com~dumontin
  • Meade, James E. (1964), Efficiency, Equality, and the Ownership of Property , London, Allen and Unwin, 92 p.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1993), ‘Is There Life Beyond Efficiency? Elements of a Social Law and Economics’, 51 Review of Social Economy , 138-153.
  • Michelman, Frank I. (1967), ‘Property, Utility and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of “Just Compensation” Law’, 80 Harvard Law Review , 1165-1258. Reprinted in Ackerman, Bruce A. (ed.), Economic Foundations of Property a Law, Boston, Little Brown, 1975, 100 ff.
  • Michelman, Frank I. (1978), ‘Norms and Normativity in the Economic Theory of Law’, 62 Minnesota Law Review , 1015-1048.
  • Michelman, Frank I. (1979), ‘A Comment on Some Uses and Abuses of Economics in Law’, 46 University of Chicago Law Review , 307-315.
  • Michelman, Frank I. (1982), ‘Ethics, Economics, and the Law of Property’, in Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W. (eds.), Nomos XXIV: Ethics, Economics and the Law , New York, New York University Press, 3-40.
  • Miller, Edythe S. (1990), ‘Economic Efficiency, the Economics Discipline, and the “Affected-with-a-Public-Interest” Concept’, 24 Journal of Economic Issues , 719-732.
  • Ng, Yew Kwang (1988), ‘Economic Efficiency versus Egalitarian Rights’, 41 Kyklos , 215-237.
  • Nieuwenhuis, J.H. (1984), ‘Recht en belang (Law and Interests)’, Flores Debitorem , 65-74.
  • Nieuwenhuis, J.H. (1988), ‘Ieder het zijne (Each His Own)’, 2 RMThemis , 73-84.
  • Nutter, Warren G. (1968), ‘Economic Welfare and Welfare Economics’, 2 Journal of Economic Issues , 166-172.
  • O’Driscoll, Gerald P., Jr. (1980), ‘Justice, Efficiency, and the Economic Analysis of Law: A Comment on Fried’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies , 355-366.
  • Ogus, Anthony I. (1980), ‘Economics, Liberty and the Common Law’, 18 Journal of Society of Public Teachers of Law , 42-57.
  • Papaioannou, Thanos (1991), ‘E Oikonomike Analyse tou Dikaiou: Mia Endiaferousa alla kai Epikindyne Theoria (Economic Analysis of Law: An Interesting but also a Dangerous Theory)’, 4 Aissymnetes , 51-65.
  • Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W. (eds.) (1982), Ethics, Economics and the Law (Nomos 24) , New York, New York University Press, 323 p.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1979), ‘Utilitarianism, Economics, and Legal Theory’, 8 Journal of Legal Studies , 103-140.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1979), ‘Some Uses and Abuses of Economics in Law’, 46 University of Chicago Law Review , 281-306.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1980), ‘The Value of Wealth: A Comment on Dworkin and Kronman’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies , 243-252.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1980), ‘The Ethical and Political Basis of the Efficiency Norm in Common Law Adjudication’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 487-507.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1981), The Economics of Justice , Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 415 p.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1981), ‘The Concept of Corrective Justice in Recent Theories of Tort Law’, 10 Journal of Legal Studies , 187-206.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1984), ‘Wealth Maximization and Judicial Decision-Making’, 4 International Review of Law and Economics , 131-135.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1985), ‘Wealth Maximization Revisited’, 2 Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy , 1378-1401.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1986), ‘The Ethical Significance of Free Choice: A Reply to Professor West’, 99 Harvard Law Review , 1431-1448.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1988), ‘Comment (on Donohue)’, 22 Law and Society Review , 927-929.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1989), ‘On Theory and Practice: Reply to “Richard Posner’s Praxis’, 49 Ohio State Law Journal , 1077-1084.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1990), ‘Law and Economics’, 24 Valparaiso University Law Review , 163-173.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1990), ‘Rebuttal to Malloy’, 24 Valparaiso University Law Review , 183-184.
  • Radin, Margaret Jane (1987), ‘Market-Inalienability’, 100 Harvard Law Review , 1849-1937.
  • Rahmsdorf, Detlev W. (1987), ‘…konomische Analyse des Rechts, Utilitarismus und die klassische deutsche Philosophie (Economic Analysis of Law, Utilitarianism and the Classical German Philosophy)’, 18 Rechtstheorie , 487-501.
  • Rahmsdorf, Detlev W. and SchŠfer, Hans-Bernd (eds.) (1988), Ethische Fragen der Wirtschaftspolitik und des Rechts (Ethical Questions of Political Economics and Law) , Berlin, Dietrich-Reimer-Verlag, 219 p.
  • Raiteri, Monica (1988), ‘Giustizia distributiva e funzione giudiziaria: qualche osservazione nella prospettiva della analisi economica del diritto (Distributive Justice and the Judicial Function, So)’, Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica , 209-228.
  • Rizzo, Mario J. (1980), ‘The Mirage of Efficiency’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 641-658.
  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1989), ‘Law and Economics: Paradigm, Politics, or Philosophy’, in Mercuro, Nicholas (ed.), Law and Economics , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 233-258.
  • Rubin, Paul H. and Keenan, Donald C. (1985), ‘Limits of the Equity-Efficiency Tradeoff’, Public Choice , 425-436.
  • Sager, Lawrence G. (1980), ‘Pareto Superiority, Consent, and Justice’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 913-937.
  • Samuels, Warren J. (1981), ‘Maximization of Wealth as Justice: An Essay on Posnerian Law and Economics as Policy Analysis’, 60 Texas Law Review , 147-172.
  • Samuels, Warren J. (1992), ‘The Persuasive Proposition, “What Is, Is and Ought To Be”: A Critique’, in Millberg, William S. (ed.), The Megacorp and Macrodynamics: Essays in Memory of Alfred Eichner , New York, Armonk, M.E. Sharpe, 273-285.
  • SchŠfer, Hans-Bernd (1989), ‘Allokationseffizienz als Grundprinzip des Zivilrechts (Allocative Efficiency as Basic Principle of Civil Law)’, in Ott, Claus and SchŠfer, Hans-Bernd (eds.), Allekationseffizienz in der Rechtsordnung , Berlin, Springer, 1-24.
  • Schlag, Pierre (1986), ‘An Appreciative Comment on Coase’s the Problem of Social Cost: A View from the Left’, Wisconsin Law Review , 919-962.
  • Schmalbeck, Richard L. (1983), ‘The Justice of Economics: An Analysis of Wealth Maximization as a Normative Goal’, 83 Columbia Law Review , 488-525.
  • Schwartz, Gary T. (1979), ‘Economics, Wealth Distribution and Justice’, Wisconsin Law Review , 799-813.
  • Schwartz, Gary T. (1981), ‘The Vitality of Negligence and the Ethics of Strict Liability’, 15 Georgia Law Review , 963-1004. Reprinted in Rabin, Robert L. (ed.), Perspectives on Tort Law, Boston, Little Brown, 1983, 71-79.
  • Seita, Alex Y. (1989), ‘Common Myths in the Economic Analysis of Law’, Brigham Young University Law Review , 993-1112.
  • Spitzer, Matthew L. and Hoffman, Elizabeth (1980), ‘A Reply to Consumption Theory, Production Theory and Ideology in the Coase Theorem’, 53 Southern California Law Review , 1187-1223.
  • Steiner, J.M. (1976), ‘Economics, Morality and the Law of Torts’, 26 University of Toronto Law Journal , 227-252.
  • Strowel, Alain (1987), ‘Utilitarisme et approche Žconomique dans la thŽorie du droit. Autour de Bentham et de Posner (Utilitarianism and Economic Approach in Legal Theory. On Bentham and Posner)’, 18 Revue interdisciplinaire d’Žtudes juridiques , 1-45.
  • Symposium (1980), ‘Symposium on Efficiency As A Legal Concern’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 485-972.
  • Thurow, L. (1970), ‘Equity vs. Efficiency in Law Enforcement’, 18 Public Policy , 451-459.
  • Tribe, Laurence H. (1985), ‘Constitutional Calculus: Equal Justice or Economic Efficiency’, 98 Harvard Law Review , 592-621.
  • Trimarchi, Pietro (1970), ‘Sul Significato Economico Dei Criteri Di Responsabilitˆ Contrattuale (Economic Meaning of Contract-Liability Criteria)’, Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile , 512-531.
  • Tullock, Gordon (1980), ‘Two Kinds of Legal Efficiency’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 659 ff.
  • Tullock, Gordon (1982), ‘Welfare and the Law’, 2 International Review of Law and Economics , 151-163.
  • Varat, Jonathan D. (1986), ‘Review Essay: Economic Ideology and the Federal Judicial Task (Review of the Federal Courts: Crisis and Reform by Richard A. Posner),’, 74 California Law Review , 649-674.
  • Veljanovski, Cento G. (1981), ‘Wealth Maximization, Law and Ethics – on the Limits of Economic Efficiency’, 1 International Review of Law and Economics , 5-28.
  • Veljanovski, Cento G. (1981), ‘The Economic Theory of Tort Liability – Toward a Corrective Justice Approach’, in Burrows, Paul and Veljanovski, Cento G. (eds.), The Economic Approach to Law , London, Butterworths, 125-150.
  • Waldron, Jeremy (1990), ‘Criticizing the Economic Analysis of Law (Book Review of Jules L. Coleman, Markets, Morals, and the Law)’, 99 Yale Law Journal , 1441-1471.
  • Weinrib, Ernest J. (1980), ‘Utilitarianism, Economics and Legal Theory’, 30 University of Toronto Law Journal , 307-332.
  • White, Barbara (1987), ‘Coase and the Courts: Economics for the Common Man.’, 72 Iowa Law Review , 577-635.
  • White, James Boyd (1987), ‘Economics and Law: Two Cultures in Tension’ (Alumni Distinguished Lecture in Jurisprudence),’, 54 Tennessee Law Review , 161-202.
  • Wittman, Donald A. (1979), ‘A Diagrammatic Expositon of Justice’, Theory and Decision , 207-237.
  • Wittman, Donald A. (1982), ‘Efficient Rules in Highway Safety and Sports Activity’, 72 American Economic Review , 78-90.
  • Zwier, Paul J. (1985), ‘The Consequentialist/Nonconsequentialist Ethical Distinction: A Tool for the Formal Appraisal of Traditional Negligence and Economic Tort Analysis’, 26 Boston College Law Review , 905-944.
Copied to clipboard