Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Encyclopedia of Law & Economics – 0720 The Endowment Effect

  • Alchian, Armen A. (1953), ‘The Meaning of Utility Measurement’, 43 American Economic Review , 26 ff.
  • Armentano, Dominick T. (1987), ‘Comment: Efficiency, Liberty, and Antitrust Policy’, in Dorn, James A. and Manne, Henry G. (eds.), Economic Liberties and the Judiciary , Fairfax, George Mason University Press, 309-316.
  • Baker, C. Edwin (1978), ‘Counting Preferences in Collective Choice Situations’, 25 UCLA Law Review .
  • Beavis, Brian and Rowley, Charles K. (1983), ‘Evaluating Choice: A Note’, 3 International Review of Law and Economics , 79-83.
  • Bishop, Richard, Heberlein, Thomas and Kealy, Mary Jo (1983), ‘Contingent Valuation of Environmental Assets: Comparisons with a Simulated Market’, 23 Natural Resources Journal , 619-648.
  • Boyce, Rebecca R., Brown, Thomas C., McClelland, Gary H., Peterson, George L. and Schulze, William D. (1992), ‘An Experimental Examination of Intrinsic Values as a Source of the WTA-WTP Disparity’, 82 American Economic Review , 1366-1373.
  • Brinig, Margaret F. and Crafton, Steven M. (1994), ‘Marriage and Opportunism’, 23 Journal of Legal Studies , 869-894.
  • Bromley, Daniel W. (1990), ‘The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis’, 19 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 86-107.
  • Brookshire, David S. and Coursey, Don L. (1987), ‘Measuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures’, 77 American Economic Review , 554-566.
  • Bruce, Christopher J. (1984), ‘Testing the Hypothesis of Common Law Efficiency: The Doctrine of Informed Consent’, 6 Research in Law and Economics , 227-265.
  • Buchanan, James M. (1962), ‘The Relevance of Pareto Optimality’, 6 Journal of Conflict Resolution , 341-354.
  • Calabresi, Guido (1991), ‘The Pointlessness of Pareto: Carrying Coase Further’, 100 Yale Law Journal , 1211-1237.
  • Centi, Jean-Pierre (1987), ‘Quel critre d’efficience pour l’analyse Žconomique du droit (Which Efficiency Criterion for Economic Analysis o)’, 2 Revue de la Recherche Juridique .
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1980), ‘Efficiency, Exchange and Auction: Philosophic Aspects of the Economic Approach to Law’, 68 California Law Review , 221-249.
  • Coleman, Jules L. (1980), ‘Efficiency, Utility, and Wealth Maximization’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 509-551.
  • Coombs, C. H., Bezembinder, T. G. and Goode, F. M. (1967), ‘Testing Expectation Theories of Decision Making without Measuring Utility or Subjective Probability’, 4 Journal of Mathematical Psychology , 72-103.
  • Cooter, Robert D. (1989), ‘The Best Right Laws: Value Foundations of the Economic Analysis of Law’, 64 Notre Dame Law Review , 817-837. Reprinted in Levit, Nancy and Hayman, Robert (Eds.), Jurisprudence: Contemporary Readings, Problems, and Narratives, West, 1994.
  • Cotter, Thomas F. (1996), ‘Legal Pragmatism and the Law and Economics Movement’, 84 Georgetown Law Journal , 2071-2141.
  • Curran, Christophe and Rubin, Paul H. (1995), ‘The Endowment Effect and Income Transfers’, 17 Research in Law and Economics , 207-217.
  • Demsetz, Harold (1969), ‘Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint’, 12 Journal of Law and Economics , 1-22.
  • Dnes, Anthony W. (1984), ‘Joint Production, National Income Definitions and Pricing in Linear Environmental Models’, 18(4) Socio-Economic Planning Sciences , 247-253.
  • Dobbs, I. (1981), ‘Externality, Efficiency and the Pareto Principle’, 1 International Review of Law and Economics , 167-181.
  • Egger, J.B. (1979), ‘Efficiency Is Not a Substitute for Ethics’, in Rizzo, Mario J. (ed.), Time, Uncertainty and Disequilibrium , Lexington (MA), Lexington Books, 117-125.
  • Fischel, William A. (1991), ‘Exploring the Kozinski Paradox: Why Is More Efficient Regulation a Taking of Property?’, 67(3) Chicago-Kent Law Review , 865-912.
  • Fischel, William A. (1995), ‘The Offer/Ask Disparity and Just Compensation for Takings: A Constitutional Choice Perspective’, 15 International Review of Law and Economics , 187-203.
  • Fishel, William A. and Shapiro, Perry (1988), ‘Takings, Insurance and Michelman: Comments on Economic Interpretations of “Just Compensation” Law’, 17 Journal of Legal Studies , 269-293. Reprinted in Robert Ellickson, Carol Rose, and Bruce Ackerman (Eds.), Perspectives on Property Law, 2d ed., 514-530, Boston, Little Brown, 1995.
  • Friedman, David D. (1988), ‘Does Altruism Produce Efficient Outcomes ? Marshall versus Kaldor’, 17 Journal of Legal Studies , 1-13.
  • Frisch, R. (1959), ‘On Welfare Theory and Pareto Regions’, 9 International Economic Review , 39-92.
  • Gantner, Manfred (1993), ‘Anmerkungen zur UniversitŠtsreform aus finanzwissenschaflticher Sicht (Notes on Reforming Universities from a Public Finance Perspective)’, in Strasser, R. (ed.), BeitrŠge zum UniversitŠtsrecht , Vienna, 119-139.
  • Gilson, Ronald J. and Kraakman, Reinier H. (1984), ‘The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency’, 70 Virginia Law Review , 549-644.
  • Glasner, David (1982), ‘On the Difference Between Wealth and Liberty’, 2 International Review of Law and Economics , 227-233.
  • Goldberg, Victor P. (1984), ‘Production Functions, Transactions, Costs, and the New Institutonalism’, in Goldberg, Victor P. (ed.), Readings in the Economics of Contract Law , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 21-23. Reprinted in Feiwel, George (Ed.), Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics Macmillan Press 395-402.
  • Grant, Robin F. (1989), ‘Judge Richard Posner’s Wealth Maximization Principle: Another Form of Utilitarianism?’, 10 Cardozo Law Review , 815-845.
  • Hammond (1982), ‘The Economics of Justice and the Criterion of Wealth Maximization’ (Book Review),’, 91 Yale Law Journal , 1493-1507.
  • Hanemann, W. Michael (1991), ‘Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?’, 81 American Economic Review , 635-647.
  • Hanks, John L. (1986), ‘On a Just Measure of the Efficiency of Law and Governmental Politics’, 8 Cardozo Law Review , 1-38.
  • Harless, David W. (1989), ‘More Laboratory Evidence on the Disparity Between Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded’, 11 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 359-379.
  • Hayashida, Seimei (1991), ‘Koritsusei tai Ihosei : Minji Iho no Keizairiron (Efficiency vs. Unlawfulness : An Economic Theory of the Unlawfulness in the Civil Law in Japan)’, 41 Hokudai Hogaku Ronshu (Hokkaido Law Review) , 1364-1450.
  • Heiner, Ronald A. (1983), ‘The Origin of Predictable Behavior’, 73 American Economic Review , 560-595.
  • Hochman, Harold M. and Peterson, George E. (eds.) (1974), Redistribution through Public Choice , New York, Columbia University Press.
  • Hoffman, Elizabeth and Spitzer, Matthew L. (1993), ‘Willingness to Pay vs. Willingness to Accept: Legal and Economic Implications’, 71 Washington University Law Quarterly , 59-114.
  • Hovenkamp, Herbert (1991), ‘Legal Policy and the Endowment Effect’, 20 Journal of Legal Studies , 225-247.
  • Hovenkamp, Herbert J. (1990), ‘Legislation, Well-Being, and Public Choice’, 57 University of Chicago Law Review , 63-116.
  • Hovenkamp, Herbert J. (1990), ‘Exchange on Public Choice’, 57 University of Chicago Law Review , 840-843.
  • Hovenkamp, Herbert J. (1991), ‘Legal Policy and the Endowment Effect’, 20 Journal of Legal Studies , 225-247.
  • Johnsen, D. Bruce (1986), ‘Wealth Is Value’, 15 Journal of Legal Studies , 263-288.
  • Jones, Peter and Sugden, Robert (1982), ‘Evaluating Choice’, 2 International Review of Law and Economics , 47-65.
  • Jones, Peter and Sugden, Robert (1983), ‘Evaluating Choice: A Reply’, 3 International Review of Law and Economics , 85-87.
  • Juhnjuhnwala, Bharat (1974), ‘Kaldor-Hicks-Scitovsky Criteria: A Postmortem’, 40 Southern Economic Journal , 493-496.
  • Kahan, Marcel (1992), ‘Securities Laws and the Social Costs of ‘Inaccurate’ Stock Prices’, Duke Law Journal , 977-1044.
  • Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1979), ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk’, 47 Econometrica , 263-291.
  • Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack and Thaler, Richard H. (1990), ‘Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem’, 98 Journal of Political Economy , 1325-1348.
  • Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack and Thaler, Richard H. (1991), ‘Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias’, 5 Journal of Economic Perspectives , 193-206.
  • Kaldor, N. (1939), ‘Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility’, 49 Economic Journal , 549-552.
  • Keenan, Donald C. (1981), ‘Value Maximization and Welfare Theory’, 10 Journal of Legal Studies , 409-419.
  • Kennedy, Duncan (1981), ‘Cost-Benefit of Entitlement Problems: A Critique’, 33 Stanford Law Review , 387-445.
  • Kirchner, Christian (1991), ‘Comment (on Eger, Nagel and Weise, Effizienz und MenschenwŸrde)’, in Ott, Claus and SchŠfer, Hans-Bernd (eds.), …konomische Probleme des Zivilrechts , Berlin, Springer, 35-38.
  • Knetsch, Jack L. (1984), ‘Legal Rules and the Basis for Evaluating Economic Losses’, 4 International Review of Law and Economics , 5-13.
  • Knetsch, Jack L. (1989), ‘The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves’, 79 American Economic Review , 1277-1284.
  • Knetsch, Jack L. (1990), ‘Environmental Policy Implications of Disparities between Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded Measures of Values’, 18 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 227-237.
  • Knetsch, Jack L. and Borcherding, Thomas (1979), ‘Expropriation of Private Property and the Basis for Compensation’, 29 University of Toronto Law Journal , 237-252.
  • Knetsch, Jack L. and Sinden, J. A. (1984), ‘Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value’, 99 Quarterly Journal of Economics , 507-521.
  • Knez, Peter, Smith, Vernon L. and Williams, Arlington W. (1985), ‘Individual Rationality, Market Rationality, and Value Estimation’, 75 American Economic Review , 397-402.
  • Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1980), ‘A Guide to the Perplexed Claims of Efficiency in the Law’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 591-639.
  • Kraakman, Reinier H. (1988), ‘Taking Discounts Seriously: The Implications of “Discounted” Share Prices as an Acquisition Motive’, 88 Columbia Law Review , 891-941.
  • Kronman, Anthony T. (1980), ‘Wealth Maximization as a Normative Principle’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies , 227-242.
  • KŸbler, Friedrich (1990), ‘Effizienz als Rechtsprinzip – †berlegungen zum rechtspraktischen Gebrauch škonomischer Argumente (Efficiency as Legal Principle – Considerations for the Legal Practice Use of Economic Arguments)’, in Baur, JŸrgen F., Hopt, Klaus J. and MailŠnder (eds.), Festschrift fŸr Ernst Steindorff , Berlin, De Gruyter, 687-704.
  • Lande, Robert H. (1982), ‘Wealth Transfers as the Original and Primary Concern of Antitrust: The Efficiency Interpretation Challenged’, 34 Hastings Law Journal , 67-151.
  • Lande, Robert H. (1988), ‘The Rise and (Coming) Fall of Efficiency as the Ruler of Antitrust’, 33 Antitrust Bulletin , 429-466. Reprinted in 23 Revista de Direito Economico 39 (1996) (Brazil) ; Eleanor Fox and James Halverson, Collaborations Among Competitors: Antitrust Policy and Economics 105-130 (1992)
  • Lande, Robert H. (1989), ‘Chicago’s False Foundation: Wealth Transfers (Not Just Efficiency) Should Guide Antitrust’, 58 Antitrust Law Journal , 631 ff. F.M. Scherer, Monopoly and Competition Policy: Volume 1, 241 (1993)
  • Lee, Dwight R. and McKenzie, Richard B. (1990), ‘Second Thoughts on the Public-Good Justification for Government Poverty Programs’, 19 Journal of Legal Studies , 189-202.
  • Lemley, Mark A. (1997), ‘The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law’, 75 Texas Law Review , 989 ff.
  • Lipsey, Richard G. and Lancaster, K. (1956), ‘On the General Theory of the Second Best’, 24 Review of Economic Studies , 11-32.
  • Loewenstein, George and Adler, Daniel (1995), ‘A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes’, 105 Economic Journal , 929-937.
  • Macey, Jonathan R. and Miller, Geoffrey P. (1990), ‘Good Finance, Bad Economics: An Analysis of the Fraud-on-the-Market Theory’, 42 Stanford Law Review , 1059-1092.
  • Margolis, Stephen E. (1987), ‘Two Definitions of Efficiency in Law and Economics’, 16 Journal of Legal Studies , 471-482.
  • Markovits, Richard S. (1975), ‘A Basic Structure for Microeconomic Policy Analysis in our Worse-Than-Second-Best World: A Proposal and Related Critique of the Chicago Approach to the Study of Law and Economics’, Wisconsin Law Review , 950-1080.
  • Markovits, Richard S. (1980), ‘Legal Analysis and the Economic Analysis of Allocative Efficiency’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 811-903.
  • McClelland, Gary H. and Schulze, William D. (1991), ‘The Disparity Between Willingness to Pay Versus Willingness to Accept as a Framing Effect’, in Brown, Donald R. and Smith, J.E. Keith (ed.), Frontiers of Mathematical Psychology: Essays in Honor of Clyde Coombs , New York, Springer, 166-192.
  • Medema, Steven G. (1993), ‘Is There Life Beyond Efficiency? Elements of a Social Law and Economics’, 51 Review of Social Economy , 138-153.
  • Medema, Steven G. and Samuels, Warren J. (1997), ‘Ronald Coase and Coasean Economics: Some Questions, Conjectures, and Implications’, in Samuels, Warren J., Medema, Steven G. and Schmid, A. Allan (eds.), The Economy as a Process of Valuation , Aldershot, Edward Elgar.
  • Miller, Geoffrey P. (1987), ‘Economic Efficiency and the Lockean Proviso,’, 10 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy , 401 ff.
  • Milovanovic Milic (1994), ‘Privatizacija i ekonomska efikasnost (Privatization and Economic Efficiency)’, 1-2 Ekonomska misao , 1-20.
  • Mishan, Ezra J. (1967), ‘Pareto Optimality and the Law’, 19 Oxford Economic Papers , 255-287.
  • O’Driscoll, Gerald P., Jr. (1980), ‘Justice, Efficiency, and the Economic Analysis of Law: A Comment on Fried’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies , 355-366.
  • Olson, Mancur (1987), ‘Why Some Welfare-State Redistribution to the Poor is a Great Idea’, in Rowley, Charles K. (ed.), Democracy and Public Choice: Essays in Honor of Gordon Tullock , Oxford, Blackwell, 191-222.
  • Ortona, Guido and Scacciati, Francesco (1992), ‘New Experiments on the Endowment Effect’, 13 Journal of Economic Psychology , 277-296.
  • Paz-Ares, C‡ndido (1993), ‘Principio de Eficiencia y Derecho privado (Efficiency and Private Law)’, in AA.VV., Derecho, moral y eficiencia, III , Jornadas de Filosof’a del Derecho, Palma de Mallorca. Revisado en Estudios en homenaje a M. Brocheta Pont, Valencia 1995, III pp.
  • Posner, Richard A. (1980), ‘The Ethical and Political Basis of the Efficiency Norm in Common Law Adjudication’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 487-507.
  • Pratt, John W. and Zeckhauser, Richard J. (1996), ‘Willingness to Pay and the Distribution of Risk and Wealth’, 104 Journal of Political Economy , 747-763.
  • Quattrone, George A. and Tversky, Amos (1988), ‘Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice’, 82 American Political Science Review , 719-736.
  • Radin, Margaret J. (1982), ‘Property and Personhood’, 34 Stanford Law Review , 957-1015.
  • Rizzo, Mario J. (1980), ‘The Mirage of Efficiency’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 641-658.
  • Rothbard, Murray N. (1979), ‘Comment: The Myth of Efficiency’, in Rizzo, Mario J. (ed.), Time, Uncertainty and Disequilibrium , Lexington (MA), Lexington Books, 91-95.
  • Rowley, Charles K. and Peacock, Alan T. (1975), Welfare Economics: A Liberal Restatement , London, Martin Robertson, 198 p.
  • Rowley, Charles K. and Walker, Martin (1979), ‘Pareto-Optimality and Gains-From-Trade: A Public Choice Interpretation ,’, 34 Public Choice , 123-127.
  • Rozen, Marvin E. (1985), ‘Maximizing Behavior: Reconciling Neoclassical and X-Efficiency Approaches’, 19 Journal of Economic Issues , 661-685.
  • Ryssdal, Stray A.C. (1995), Legal Realism & Economics as Behavior – A Scandinavian Look at the Economic Analysis of Law , Oslo, Juridisk Forlag.
  • Sager, Lawrence G. (1980), ‘Pareto Superiority, Consent, and Justice’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 913-937.
  • Samuels, Warren J. and Mercuro, Nicholas (1984), ‘Posnerian Law and Economics on the Bench’, 4 International Review of Law and Economics , 107-130.
  • Samuels, Warren J. and Mercuro, Nicholas (1986), ‘Wealth Maximalization and Judicial Decision-Making: The Issues Further Clarified’, 6 International Review of Law and Economics , 133-137.
  • Samuelson, W. and Zeckhauser, R. (1988), ‘Status Quo Bias in Decision Making’, 1 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 7-60.
  • Schwarzer, Stephan (1985), ”Wirtschaftsrecht und škonomische Effizienz (Commercial Law and Economic Efficiency)’, Wirtschaftspolitische BlŠtter , 26-31.
  • Scitovski, T. (1951), ‘The State of the Welfare Economics’, 41 American Economic Review .
  • Shavell, Steven (1981), ‘A Note on Efficiency Vs. Distributional Equity in Legal Rulemaking: Should Distributional Equity Matter Given Optimal Income Taxation?’, 71 American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings , 414-418.
  • Shaviro, Daniel N. (1990), ‘Exchange on Public Choice’, 57 University of Chicago Law Review , 834-843.
  • Shogren, Jason F., Shin, Seung Y., Hayer, Dermot J. and Kleibenstein, James B. (1994), ‘Resolving Difference in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept’, 84 American Economic Review , 255-270.
  • Sileo, Patrick W. (1995), ‘Intransitivity of Indifference, Strong Monotonicity, and the Endowment Effect’, 66 Journal of Economic Theory , 198-223.
  • Slovic, P. and Lichtenstein, S. (1968), ‘Relative Importance of Probabilities and Payoffs in Risk Taking’, 78 Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1-18.
  • Smith, Vernon (1991), ‘Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology’, 99 Journal of Political Economy , 877-897.
  • Stigler, George J. (1970), ‘Director’s Law of Public Income Redistribution’, 13 Journal of Law and Economics , 1-10.
  • Stigler, George J. (1976), ‘The Xistence of X-Efficiency’, 66 American Economic Review , 213-216.
  • Stigler, George J. (1978), ‘Wealth, and Possibly Liberty’, 7 Journal of Legal Studies , 213-217.
  • Stout, Lynn A. (1996), ‘Insurance or Gambling? Derivatives Trading In A World of Risk and Uncertainty’, 39 Brookings Review .
  • Stout, Lynn A. (1997), ‘How Efficient Markets Undervalue Stocks: CAPM and ECMH in A World of Uncertainty and Disagreement’, (forthc.) Cardozo Law Review .
  • Stout, Lynn A. (1997), ‘ATechnology, Transactions Costs, and Investor Welfare: Is a Motley Fool Born Every Minute?’, 75 Washington University Law Quarterly .
  • Symposium (1980), ‘Symposium on Efficiency As A Legal Concern’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 485-972.
  • Thaler, Richard (1980), ‘Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice’, 1 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 39-60.
  • Tullock, Gordon (1971), ‘Subsidized Housing in a Competitive Market: Comment’, 61 American Economic Review , 218-219.
  • Tullock, Gordon (1980), ‘Two Kinds of Legal Efficiency’, 8 Hofstra Law Review , 659 ff.
  • Tullock, Gordon (1983), Economics of Income Redistribution , Boston, Kluwer-Nijhoff, 208 p.
  • Tullock, Gordon (1986), The Economics of Wealth and Poverty , New York, Columbia University Press, 210 p.
  • Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel (1991), ‘Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model’, 106 Quarterly Journal of Economics , 1039-1061.
  • Tversky, Amos and Wakker, Peter (1995), ‘Risk Attitudes and Decision Weights’, 63 Econometrica , 1255-1280.
  • Veljanovski, Cento G. (1981), ‘Wealth Maximization, Law and Ethics – on the Limits of Economic Efficiency’, 1 International Review of Law and Economics , 5-28.
  • Vukotic Veselin (1993), ‘Privatizacija, pravicnost i efikasnost (Privatization, Justice, and Efficiency)’, 1-2 Ekonomist , 81-88.
  • Wang, William K.S. (1986), ‘Some Arguments that the Stock Market Is Not Efficient’, 19 U.C. Davis Law Review , 341-402.
  • Wetzstein, Michael E. and Centner, Terence J. (1992), ‘Regulating Agricultural Contamination of Groundwater Through Strict Liability and Negligence Legislation’, 22 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 1-11.
  • Wieckhorst, Thomas (1994), Recht und Oekonomie des Produkthaftungsgesetzes. Eine an den recthlichen Zielvorgaben und am Effizienzkriterium orientierte Analyse (Law and Economics of the Product Liability Law. Legal Goals and Efficiency) , Baden-Baden, Nomos.
Copied to clipboard